Pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Lang, Yitian [1 ]
Lin, Yan [1 ]
Li, Dan [2 ]
Liu, Jiyong [2 ]
Liu, Xiaoyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 9, Sch Med, Dept Pharm,Huangpu Branch, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Pharm, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2023年 / 12卷 / 18期
关键词
advanced gastric cancer; cost-effectiveness; partitioned survival approach; pembrolizumab; the perspective of the US and China; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; NIVOLUMAB; SURVIVAL; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.6389
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The KEYNOTE-062 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for advanced gastric cancer (GC). The current study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced GC from the perspective of the United States and China. And the results will provide evidence and data support for more drug selection-related decisions and research in the future.Methods: A partitioned survival approach with three states was created for treatment of advanced GC. The survival data were derived from KEYNOTE-062 trial and the individual patient data were generated by a specific algorithm. We fitted 21 survival functions to each treatment arm and selected the most suitable distribution type for each one. Direct costs and utility values were collected from the published, available database. Cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were considered as the primary measure outcomes. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the reliability of the analyses.Results: In the base-case analysis of combined positive score (CPS) =1 patients, the ICUR of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in American and Chinese setting is $345,209/QALY and $186,802.6/QALY, respectively. And the ICUR of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy is $473,650/QALY and $377,753/QALY in the context of the US and China, respectively. For CPS=10 patients, the ICUR of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in American and Chinese setting is $483,742/QALY and $262,965/QALY, respectively. And that of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy is $96,550/QALY and $67,896/QALY in the context of the US and China.Conclusion: Compared with chemotherapy, either pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or pembrolizumab monotherapy is not regarded as a cost-effective strategy for patients with CPS=1, advanced gastric cancer in the current American and Chinese setting. But pembrolizumab monotherapy for CPS=10 patients would become a cost-effective option in the American setting.
引用
收藏
页码:18447 / 18459
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness analysis of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in China
    Chen, Xin-Zu
    Jiang, Kun
    Hu, Jian-Kun
    Zhang, Bo
    Gou, Hong-Feng
    Yang, Kun
    Chen, Zhi-Xin
    Chen, Lia-Ping
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 14 (17) : 2715 - 2722
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in China
    Zhiwei Zheng
    Ling Fang
    Hongfu Cai
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [3] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer in China
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Fang, Ling
    Cai, Hongfu
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [4] Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy versus placebo combined with chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Song, Xiaobing
    Cai, Hongfu
    Zhu, Huide
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (08) : 1017 - 1025
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-Miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Wang, Hao-Lun
    Wang, Ying-Yuan
    Chen, Ze-Chang
    Zhou, Qin
    Li, Xiang-Ping
    Zhang, Ying-Ying
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (05): : 6182 - 6189
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced endometrial cancer
    Huo, Gengwei
    Song, Ying
    Chen, Peng
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 (06)
  • [7] First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Cao, Xueqiong
    Zhang, Mingming
    Li, Na
    Zheng, Bin
    Liu, Maobai
    Song, Xiaobing
    Cai, Hongfu
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 15
  • [8] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sintilimab Combined with Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer
    Ye, Zhuo-Miao
    Xu, Zhe
    Zeng, Fan-Yuan
    Tang, Zi-Qing
    Zhou, Qin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [9] First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced esophageal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Cao, Xueqiong
    Cai, Hongfu
    Li, Na
    Zheng, Bin
    Zheng, Zhiwei
    Liu, Maobai
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 14
  • [10] Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in untreated advanced pleural mesothelioma in the Chinese healthcare system
    Lang, Wenwang
    He, Yulong
    Hou, Changchun
    Li, Hua
    Jiang, Qinling
    Mei, Liuyong
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 15