Quantitative analysis of heavy metals in soil by X-ray fluorescence with improved variable selection strategy and bayesian optimized support vector regression

被引:10
|
作者
Lu, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Li, Fusheng [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Wanqi [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Pengfei [2 ]
Lv, Shubin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Automat Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Yangtze Delta Reg Inst, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
X-ray fluorescence; Continuous background removal; Variational mode decomposition; Support vector regression; Bayesian optimization; Sensitivity analysis; BACKGROUND REMOVAL; PORTABLE-XRF; DECOMPOSITION; TRANSFORM; ALGORITHM; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104842
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As a sensitive analytical technique, x-ray fluorescence (XRF) has received increasing attention in elemental analysis applications. In this paper, XRF technique coupled with improved variable selection strategy and bayesian optimized support vector regression was proposed for predicting heavy metals in the soil. First of all, an iterative variational mode decomposition (VMD) framework was provided to tackle continuous background interference in the XRF spectra of soil. The corrected spectra were then utilized for quantitative analysis of heavy metals. Aiming to implement accurate heavy metal prediction, we resorted to support vector regression (SVR) to establish the non-linear model. Combined with Bayesian optimization algorithm, the bayesian optimized SVR (BO-SVR) with optimal hyperparameters was obtained. However, severe collinearity between input variables can affect the accuracy and stability of the model. Towards this, the research utilized sensitivity analysis as the variable selection approach prior to BO-SVR prediction of XRF data sets. The experimental results revealed that BO-SVR assisted with VMD and sensitivity analysis yielded the best model outcome. Moreover, considerable contributions were observed by employing sensitivity analysis. It showed R2 ������ of 0.9472 (for Cu), 0.7534 (for As), 0.9374 (for Zn), and 0.9283 (for Pb), and RMSEP of 58.0472 (for Cu), 16.5271 (for As), 63.2069 (for Zn) and 64.0662 (for Pb) without using variable selection technique. Resorting to sensitivity analysis, the R2 ������ of Cu, As, Zn and Pb achieved 0.9918, 0.9526, 0.9611 and 0.9541, respectively and the RMSEP of Cu, As, Zn and Pb achieved 22.8803, 11.6868, 38.8753 and 32.9387, respectively. The results of this study clearly illustrated that the proposed model is an effective method for the analysis of heavy metals in soil.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative study of X-ray fluorescence and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry of heavy metals in the analysis of soil samples
    Krishna, A. Keshav
    Mohan, K. Rama
    Murthy, N. N.
    Govil, P. K.
    ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2008, 29 (03) : 83 - 89
  • [22] Soil characterization by energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence:: Sampling strategy for in situ analysis
    Custo, G
    Boeykens, S
    Dawidowski, L
    Fox, L
    Gómez, D
    Luna, F
    Vázquez, C
    ANALYTICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 21 (07) : 751 - 756
  • [23] Soil Characterization by Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence: Sampling Strategy for in situ Analysis
    Graciela Custo
    Susana Boeykens
    L. Dawidowski
    L. Fox
    D. G. Ómez
    F. L. Una
    Cristina Vázquez
    Analytical Sciences, 2005, 21 : 751 - 756
  • [24] Preparation of Samples for X-ray Fluorescence Analysis for Determining Traces of Heavy Metals in Foodstuffs.
    Scheubeck, Egmont
    Joerrens, Charlotte
    Siemens Forschungs- und Entwicklungsberichte/Siemens Research and Development Reports, 1981, 10 (01): : 29 - 33
  • [25] Online X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Analysis of Heavy Metals in Pulverized Coal on a Conveyor Belt
    Zhang Yan
    Zhang XinLei
    Jia WenBao
    Shan Qing
    Ling YongSheng
    Hei DaQian
    Chen Da
    APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 2016, 70 (02) : 272 - 278
  • [26] Application of Improved Variable Learning Rate Back Propagation Neural Network in Energy Dispersion X-Ray Fluorescence Quantitative Analysis
    Li, Fei
    Ge, Liangquan
    Dan, Wenxuan
    Gu, Yi
    He, Qingju
    Sun, Kun
    2019 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING AND BIG DATA ANALYSIS (ICCCBDA), 2019, : 428 - 432
  • [27] Parameters selection for different metals in coating thickness measurement using X-ray fluorescence analysis
    Rong, Jie
    Zhu, Xiaoping
    Wang, Kai
    Du, Hua
    9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED OPTICAL MANUFACTURING AND TESTING TECHNOLOGIES: SUBDIFFRACTION-LIMITED PLASMONIC LITHOGRAPHY AND INNOVATIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 10842
  • [28] Subsurface measurement of soil heavy-metal concentrations with the SCAPS X-ray fluorescence (XRF) metals sensor
    Elam, WT
    Adams, JW
    Hudson, KR
    McDonald, B
    Gilfrich, JV
    FIELD ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 2 (02): : 97 - 102
  • [29] Development of an online X-ray fluorescence analysis system for heavy metals measurement in cement raw meal
    Shan Qing
    Zhang XinLei
    Zhang Yan
    Jia WenBao
    Ling YongSheng
    Hei DaQian
    Chu ShengNan
    SPECTROSCOPY LETTERS, 2016, 49 (03) : 188 - 193
  • [30] Comparison of linear regression models for quantitative geochemical analysis:: An example using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry
    Guevara, M
    Verma, SP
    Velasco-Tapia, F
    Cruz, RLS
    Girón, P
    GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYTICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 29 (03) : 271 - 284