Quantitative analysis of heavy metals in soil by X-ray fluorescence with improved variable selection strategy and bayesian optimized support vector regression

被引:10
|
作者
Lu, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Li, Fusheng [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Wanqi [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Pengfei [2 ]
Lv, Shubin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Automat Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Yangtze Delta Reg Inst, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
X-ray fluorescence; Continuous background removal; Variational mode decomposition; Support vector regression; Bayesian optimization; Sensitivity analysis; BACKGROUND REMOVAL; PORTABLE-XRF; DECOMPOSITION; TRANSFORM; ALGORITHM; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104842
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As a sensitive analytical technique, x-ray fluorescence (XRF) has received increasing attention in elemental analysis applications. In this paper, XRF technique coupled with improved variable selection strategy and bayesian optimized support vector regression was proposed for predicting heavy metals in the soil. First of all, an iterative variational mode decomposition (VMD) framework was provided to tackle continuous background interference in the XRF spectra of soil. The corrected spectra were then utilized for quantitative analysis of heavy metals. Aiming to implement accurate heavy metal prediction, we resorted to support vector regression (SVR) to establish the non-linear model. Combined with Bayesian optimization algorithm, the bayesian optimized SVR (BO-SVR) with optimal hyperparameters was obtained. However, severe collinearity between input variables can affect the accuracy and stability of the model. Towards this, the research utilized sensitivity analysis as the variable selection approach prior to BO-SVR prediction of XRF data sets. The experimental results revealed that BO-SVR assisted with VMD and sensitivity analysis yielded the best model outcome. Moreover, considerable contributions were observed by employing sensitivity analysis. It showed R2 ������ of 0.9472 (for Cu), 0.7534 (for As), 0.9374 (for Zn), and 0.9283 (for Pb), and RMSEP of 58.0472 (for Cu), 16.5271 (for As), 63.2069 (for Zn) and 64.0662 (for Pb) without using variable selection technique. Resorting to sensitivity analysis, the R2 ������ of Cu, As, Zn and Pb achieved 0.9918, 0.9526, 0.9611 and 0.9541, respectively and the RMSEP of Cu, As, Zn and Pb achieved 22.8803, 11.6868, 38.8753 and 32.9387, respectively. The results of this study clearly illustrated that the proposed model is an effective method for the analysis of heavy metals in soil.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative analysis of heavy metals in soil by X-ray fluorescence with PCA-ANOVA and support vector regression
    Yang, Wanqi
    Li, Fusheng
    Zhao, Yanchun
    Lu, Xin
    Yang, Siyuan
    Zhu, Pengfei
    ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2022, 14 (40) : 3944 - 3952
  • [2] Quantitative analysis of metals in soil using X-ray fluorescence
    dos Anjos, MJ
    Lopes, RT
    de Jesus, EFO
    Assis, JT
    Cesareo, R
    Barradas, CAA
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART B-ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY, 2000, 55 (07) : 1189 - 1194
  • [3] Quantitative analysis of heavy metals in soil via hierarchical deep neural networks with X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy
    Yang, Wanqi
    Li, Fusheng
    Lyu, Shubin
    Zhang, Qinglun
    Zhao, Yanchun
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY, 2023, 38 (09) : 1830 - 1840
  • [4] Interlaboratory experiment on certification of a method for x-ray fluorescence analysis of heavy metals in soil
    Pukhovskii, AV
    Permyakov, YV
    INDUSTRIAL LABORATORY, 1999, 65 (12): : 817 - 818
  • [5] X-ray fluorescence analysis of micronutrients and heavy metals in soils
    Savichev, AT
    Sorokin, SE
    EURASIAN SOIL SCIENCE, 2000, 33 : S161 - S164
  • [6] Comparison of Soil Heavy Metals Determined by AAS/AFS and Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis
    Ran Jing
    Wang De-jian
    Wang Can
    Bo Lu-ji
    Zheng Ji-cheng
    Yao Li-peng
    SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (11) : 3113 - 3118
  • [7] Comparing field portable x-ray fluorescence (XRF) to laboratory analysis of heavy metals in soil
    Shefsky, S
    FIELD ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES AND TOXIC CHEMICALS, 1997, : 195 - 205
  • [8] X-ray fluorescence analysis for the detection of heavy metals in plant matter
    Rethfeld, H.
    Beitz, L.
    1600, (05):
  • [9] Analysis of Heavy Metal in Soil with Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry
    Han Ping
    Wang Ji-hua
    Lu An-xiang
    Ma Zhi-hong
    Pan Li-gang
    SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 32 (03) : 826 - 829
  • [10] Quantitative analysis of platinum group metals using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry
    H. Yoon
    C. S. Park
    C. Yoon
    J. Hong
    N. S. Kim
    K. N. Han
    Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2005, 22 : 101 - 106