Investigating the energy efficiency determinants in EU countries by using multi-criteria decision analysis and the Tobit regression model

被引:1
|
作者
Cam, Salih [1 ]
Kagizman, Muhammed Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Dept Econometr, Adana, Turkiye
关键词
SBM-DEA; TOPSIS; energy efficiency; Tobit panel regression; energy in EU; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CARBON EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; SAVING TARGETS; CO2; EMISSION; REGIONS; DEA; EUROPE; CHINA;
D O I
10.1080/15567249.2023.2233968
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effects of several contextual variables, including renewable energy intensity, capital stock per labor, natural resource rent, the share of imported energy in total energy consumption, the ratio of carbon emissions to GDP, population, and energy production on energy efficiency in EU countries. While Tobit regression is used to examine the effects of contextual variables on energy efficiency, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Slack-Based Data Envelopment Analysis (SBM-DEA), and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are used to calculate energy efficiency values of countries. Four different Tobit regression models are estimated as a function of the censored value for the energy efficiency series. The results show that renewable energy intensity, the ratio of carbon emissions to GDP, and population size have negative effects on energy efficiency. In contrast, regardless of the efficiency level, the share of imported energy in total energy consumption, total energy production, capital stock per labor, and technological progress have positive effects on energy efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selection of a Photovoltaic Panel Cooling Technique Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
    Kaneesamkandi, Zakariya
    Rehman, Ateekh Ur
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [42] Drivers and barriers to the adoption of decentralised renewable energy technologies: A multi-criteria decision analysis
    Aparisi-Cerda, I.
    Ribo-Perez, D.
    Garcia-Melon, M.
    D'Este, P.
    Poveda-Bautista, R.
    ENERGY, 2024, 305
  • [43] Trust Blog Ranking Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis AHP and TOPSIS
    Zulkefli, Nurul Akhmal Binti Mohd
    Bin Baharudin, Baharum
    Said, Abas Bin Md
    IT CONVERGENCE AND SECURITY 2017, VOL 2, 2018, 450 : 68 - 76
  • [44] Chemical storage of wind energy by renewable methanol production: Feasibility analysis using a multi-criteria decision matrix
    Matzen, Michael
    Alhajji, Mahdi
    Demirel, Yasar
    ENERGY, 2015, 93 : 343 - 353
  • [45] A Scenario-Based Analysis of Forest Product Transportation Using a Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method
    Akay, Anil Orhan
    Demir, Murat
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (05):
  • [46] Life Cycle Analysis with Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A review of approaches for the sustainability evaluation of renewable energy technologies
    Campos-Guzman, Veronica
    Socorro Garcia-Cascales, M.
    Espinosa, Nieves
    Urbina, Antonio
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 104 : 343 - 366
  • [47] Multi-criteria analysis of renewable energy alternatives in southwest Sumba using TOPSIS method with 5C framework
    Hamzah
    Lestari, Retno Martanti Endah
    Sasongko, Hendro
    Heirunissa
    Bekak, Daud Obed
    DECISION SCIENCE LETTERS, 2025, 14 (02) : 251 - 264
  • [48] A hybrid multi-criteria decision model for supporting customer-focused profitability analysis
    Lau, Henry
    Nakandala, Dilupa
    Samaranayake, Premaratne
    Shum, Paul
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2016, 116 (06) : 1105 - 1130
  • [49] SMART CITY EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT MODEL: MULTI-CRITERIA ANALYSIS OF 127 CROATIAN CITIES
    Babic, Ana
    Blecich, Andrea Arbula
    Samarzija, Nikolina Dukic
    EKONOMSKI VJESNIK, 2024, 37 (02):
  • [50] Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis
    Maxim, Alexandru
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 65 : 284 - 297