Assessing the Impact of Maxillomandibular Difference on the Success of Orthodontic Decompensation Preparation in Orthognathic Surgical Skeletal Class-III Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Laviv, Amir [1 ]
Hija, Ahmad [2 ]
Allon, Dror M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Maurice & Gabriela Goldschleger Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Fac Med, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Lab, IL-3525433 Haifa, Israel
[3] Assuta Med Ctr, Orthognath & TMJ Surg Ctr, IL-69271 Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 14期
关键词
orthognathic surgery; decompensation; cephalometric analysis; dentistry; orthodontics; MALOCCLUSION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/app13148069
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Background: Combined orthodontic-surgical treatment includes a thorough diagnosis and analysis of dental and facial deformities. Cephalometric analysis is a common tool for this, in which measurements of specific anatomical landmarks are performed. In order to achieve a successful surgery, orthodontic teeth preparation is mandatory, including dental decompensation before surgery. This should be planned and adequately executed to allow the surgeon to move the jaws to the correct ideal position. Aim: The current study aimed to check if the orthodontic decompensation amount is influenced and compromised by the maxillomandibular difference and if there is a correlation between the deformity's severity and the orthodontist's difficulty in achieving an accurate result in the orthodontic decompensation preparation. Methods: The study consisted of 50 pre-operational cephalometric radiographs of patients with Class-III (prognathic) deformity. The measurements included the angles of the upper incisor (U1) longitudinal axis to the Frankfort plane (FH) and palatal plane (PP), lower incisor (L1) longitudinal axis to the lower mandibular plane (MP), overjet (OJ), effective maxillary length, effective mandibular length, and the maxilla-mandibular difference (Diff); Pearson correlation coefficient was applied. Results: There was a significant correlation between the maxilla-mandibular difference and U1 to FH angle (r = 0.254, p = 0.037), U1 to PP angle (r = 0.447, p < 0.001), OJ (r = (-0.426), p < 0.001). There was no statistical significance for Diff and L1 to MP angle (p = 0.342). Conclusions: In Class-III patients, achieving adequate decompensation is more challenging with the maxillary incisors rather than with the mandibular incisors, especially in more severe cases.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Comparison of Different Decompensation Approaches on Facial Profile in Orthodontic-Orthognathic Treatment for Skeletal Class III Patients
    Liu, Linan
    Liu, Yan
    Han, Lichi
    Zhang, Chunjie
    Hou, Peiyu
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (05) : 1957 - 1966
  • [2] Difference in Degrees of Satisfaction with Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontic Treatment between Skeletal Class III and Cleft Patients
    Yim, Sunjin
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (04) : 985 - 991
  • [3] Dentoskeletal Stability in Conventional Orthognathic Surgery, Presurgical Orthodontic Treatment and Surgery-First Approach in Class-III Patients
    Seifi, Massoud
    Matini, Negin-Sadat
    Motabar, Amir-Reza
    Motabar, Mahtab
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 7 (03) : 283 - 293
  • [4] Influence of surgical orthodontic treatment on masticatory function in skeletal Class III patients
    Kubota, T.
    Yagi, T.
    Tomonari, H.
    Ikemori, T.
    Miyawaki, S.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 42 (10) : 733 - 741
  • [5] Impact of orthognathic surgery on the prevalence of dehiscence in Class II and Class III surgical-orthodontic patients: A cone beam computed tomographic study
    dos Santos, Monique Cimao
    Vessoni Iwaki, Lilian Cristina
    Valladares-Neto, Jose
    Inoue-Arai, Maristela Sayuri
    Ramos, Adilson Luiz
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2021, 91 (05) : 611 - 618
  • [6] Clinical predictive factors for temporomandibular disorders following combined orthodontic and orthognathic surgical treatment in patients with Class III malocclusion
    Antonarakis, Gregory S.
    Kalberer, Nicole
    Courvoisier, Delphine S.
    Scolozzi, Paolo
    CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2017, 35 (06): : 397 - 404
  • [7] The influence of pre-surgical orthodontic treatment on the dento-skeletal profile of Class III patients
    Fernandes, Natascha
    Godinho, Joana
    Jardim, Luis
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE ESTOMATOLOGIA MEDICINA DENTARIA E CIRURGIA MAXILOFACIAL, 2020, 61 (01): : 2 - 9
  • [8] Does Maxillomandibular Counterclockwise Rotation Affect Surgical Stability in Class III Skeletal Patients with High Plane Angle? A Retrospective Longitudinal Study
    Dalaie, Kazem
    Senagoo, Nazanin
    Tabrizi, Reza
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2022, 21 (04): : 1259 - 1266
  • [9] Accelerated decompensation of mandibular incisors in surgical skeletal Class III patients by using augmented corticotomy: A preliminary study
    Ahn, Hyo-Won
    Lee, Dong-Yeol
    Park, Young-Guk
    Kim, Seong-Hun
    Chung, Kyu-Rhim
    Nelson, Gerald
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [10] Treatment decision of camouflage or surgical orthodontic treatment for skeletal Class III patients based on analysis of masticatory function
    Kawai, Nobuhiko
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    Shibata, Manami
    Horiuchi, Shinya
    Fushima, Kenji
    Tanaka, Eiji
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2022, 17 (02) : 822 - 830