Sustainability, productivity, profitability and nutritional diversity of six cropping systems under conservation agriculture: A long term study in eastern India

被引:6
|
作者
Dutta, S. K. [1 ]
Laing, Alison [2 ]
Kumar, Sanjay [1 ]
Shambhavi, Shweta [1 ]
Kumar, Sunil [1 ]
Kumar, Birender [1 ]
Verma, D. K. [3 ]
Kumar, Arun [1 ]
Singh, Ravi Gopal [4 ]
Gathala, Mahesh [5 ]
机构
[1] Bihar Agr Univ, Sabour, Bihar, India
[2] CSIRO Agr & Food, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Dr Kalam Agr Coll, Kishanganj, Bihar, India
[4] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr, Texcoco, Mexico
[5] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Conservation agriculture; Maize equivalent yield; Sustainable yield index; Protein yield; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; YIELD TRENDS; SOIL; DIVERSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103641
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: Intensive cropping and elevated input use to achieve high crop yields have resulted in the injudicious use of resources and a consequent reduction in profit margins for farmers in the Eastern Gangetic Plains (EGP) region of South Asia. In this region rice-wheat (RW) under conventional tillage (CT) management is the most widely cultivated cropping system. While conservation agriculture (CA)-based management practices have been demonstrated to improve cropping system performance, they are considered by many farmers to be risky, and adoption of CA in rice-based cropping systems is low. There has been little agronomic research into alternative cropping systems to develop diversification options appropriate for the EGP. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that shifting from a conventional RW system to crop establishment practices which incorporate CA principles, combined with alternative crops could improve the whole cropping system in terms of productivity, profitability, and nutritional security (as crop protein).METHODS: A long-term experiment evaluated the performance of five maize-based cropping systems under CA -based management relative to CT RW. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: CA-based practices improved the maize equivalent yield (MEY) by 4-15%, protein yield by 21%, input water productivity by 14-29% and the sustainable yield index by 10-11%, relative to the CT RW baseline. Cropping system labour requirements under CT were 12% higher than those under CA. The average cost of production under CT (USD $933) was 13-14% higher than in systems under CA; cropping systems under CA achieved net returns which were 31-34% higher. Diversifying from the traditional RW system to maize-based systems improved performance in all systems except maize-mustard. SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate that while cropping system performance can be improved by applying CA-based management in RW systems, diversifying to maize-based systems in combination with CA may sus-tainably improve smallholder productivity and profitability while reducing some of the constraints to intro-ducing CA in rice-based systems. These findings are important for the millions of smallholder farmers across the EGP to sustainably improve food and nutrition security for South Asia.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Sustainable Intensification of Cropping Systems under Conservation Agriculture Practices: Impact on Yield, Productivity and Profitability of Wheat
    Kumar, Arun
    Saini, Kulvir Singh
    Dasila, Hemant
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Devi, Kavita
    Bisht, Yashpal Singh
    Yadav, Manish
    Kothiyal, Shivani
    Chilwal, Aaradhana
    Maithani, Damini
    Kaushik, Prashant
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [2] Productivity and profitability of maize-legume cropping systems under conservation agriculture among smallholder farmers in Malawi
    Ngwira, Amos Robert
    Kabambe, Vernon
    Simwaka, Pacsu
    Makoko, Kondwani
    Kamoyo, Kefasi
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2020, 70 (03) : 241 - 251
  • [3] Conservation agriculture practices in Indian mustard ( Brassica juncea )-based cropping systems for enhanced productivity and profitability
    Jat, R. S.
    Singh, H., V
    Choudhary, R. L.
    Meena, M. K.
    Rai, P. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2024, 94 (06): : 678 - 683
  • [4] Conservation agriculture and resource management under jute (Corchorus spp.) based cropping systems in eastern India
    Datta, Debarati
    Saha, R.
    Ghorai, A. K.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2020, 119 (06): : 926 - 933
  • [5] Enhancing Energetics, System Productivity, Profitability and Soil Fertility in Maize Based Cropping System by Conservation vis a vis Conventional Agriculture in North-West India
    Tripathi, S. C.
    Kumar, Nitesh
    Venkatesh, Karnam
    Meena, R. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2025, 19 (01) : 117 - 130
  • [6] Conservation agriculture systems for Malawian smallholder farmers: long-term effects on crop productivity, profitability and soil quality
    Ngwira, Amos Robert
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (04) : 350 - 363
  • [7] Effects of weed control strategy on weed dynamics, soybean productivity and profitability under conservation agriculture in India
    Sepat, Seema
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Sharma, Ajit Ram
    Pavuluri, Kiran
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Iquebal, Mir Asif
    Verma, Ajay
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2017, 210 : 61 - 70
  • [8] Effectiveness of conservation agriculture in increasing crop productivity in low-input rainfed rice cropping systems under humid subtropical climate
    Ranaivoson, Lalaina
    Naudin, Krishna
    Ripoche, Aude
    Rabeharisoa, Lilia
    Corbeels, Marc
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2019, 239 : 104 - 113
  • [9] Impact of long term conservation agriculture on soil quality under cereal based systems of North West India
    Roy, Dibakar
    Datta, Ashim
    Jat, H. S.
    Choudhary, Madhu
    Sharma, P. C.
    Singh, P. K.
    Jat, M. L.
    GEODERMA, 2022, 405
  • [10] Phosphorus skipping effect on productivity, profitability and sustainability of rice-wheat cropping systems in Indo-Gangetic plains of India
    Tripathi, Subhash Chandra
    Chander, Subhash
    Meena, Raj Pal
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (08) : 1134 - 1146