Patient-reported outcome measures for the evaluation of foot and ankle function-recommendations from the research committee of the AGA

被引:1
作者
Ackermann, Jakob [1 ]
Guenther, Daniel [2 ]
Laky, Brenda [3 ]
Mathis, Dominic [4 ]
Deichsel, Adrian [5 ]
Akguen, Doruk [6 ]
Schuettler, Karl Friedrich [7 ]
Wafaisade, Arasch [2 ]
Eggeling, Lena [8 ]
Kopf, Sebastian [9 ]
Herbst, Elmar [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klin Balgrist, Abt Orthopadie, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Klinikum Univ Witten Herdecke, Krankenhaus Koln Merheim, Klin Orthopadie Unfallchirurg & Sporttraumatol, Cologne, Germany
[3] Austrian Res Grp Regenerat & Orthoped Med AURROM, Vienna, Austria
[4] Kantonsspital Baselland Bruderholz, Abt Orthopad Chirurg Traumatol, Bruderholz, Switzerland
[5] Univ Klinikum Munster, Klin Unfall Hand & Wiederherstellungschirurg, Munster, Germany
[6] Charite, Cent Muskuloskeletale Chirurg, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany
[7] Orthopaedicum, Lich, Germany
[8] BG Kliniken Hamburg, Abt Unfallchirurg Orthopadie & Sporttraumatol, Hamburg, Germany
[9] Med Hsch Brandenburg Theodor Fontane Univ Klin Br, Zent Orthopadie & Unfallchirurg, Brandenburg, Germany
关键词
Foot; Ankle; Patient-reported outcome measures; FAOS; Quality of life; Clinical outcome; Trials; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; ABILITY MEASURE; FUNCTION INDEX; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ITALIAN VERSION; GERMAN VERSION; KOREAN VERSION; VALIDITY; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00142-023-00594-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The standardized collection of treatment results is increasingly utilized in modern medicine. The primary focus is on the subjective clinical outcome and patient satisfaction, which has gained importance not only in the academic world but also in current healthcare policy. There are numerous questionnaires (scores or patient-reported outcome measures, PROMs) that are both joint-specific and in some cases pathology-specific and can be used in patients undergoing orthopedic treatment. Accordingly, a variety of questionnaires are available in the field of foot and ankle surgery, yet these are often very heterogeneous and rarely pathology-specific. Considering the diversity of PROMs in the current literature, it is of great interest to evaluate the scientific quality while unifying research communication by using well-established questionnaires selected according to academic quality criteria. The overall goal is to obtain valid, reliable and representative data to get an accurate characterization of the actual treatment results. Aside from qualitative criteria, compact and easy to understand questionnaires are required to generate high response rates among patients. Lastly, the results obtained should always be assessed in light of the clinical relevance they may have. Thus, the utilization of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the respective PROM, which represents the smallest value that is perceived as clinical change by the patient, is recommended. Considering all these criteria, the research committee of the AGA recommends the following PROMs: the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) to assess general pain symptoms and function, and the EQ 5D questionnaire for assessment of the quality of life. Although no pathology-specific recommendation can be made due to a lack of data, the FAOS has been validated for numerous foot and ankle pathologies and is available in the German language.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 134
页数:7
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Evidence for validity and reliability of a french version of the FAAM [J].
Borloz, Stephane ;
Crevoisier, Xavier ;
Deriaz, Olivier ;
Ballabeni, Pierluigi ;
Martin, RobRoy L. ;
Luthi, Francois .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2011, 12
[2]   Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index [J].
Budiman-Mak, Elly ;
Conrad, Kendon ;
Stuck, Rodney ;
Matters, Michael .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 27 (07) :519-527
[3]   THE FOOT FUNCTION INDEX - A MEASURE OF FOOT PAIN AND DISABILITY [J].
BUDIMANMAK, E ;
CONRAD, KJ ;
ROACH, KE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 44 (06) :561-570
[4]   Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) [J].
Celik, Derya ;
Malkoc, Melih ;
Martin, RobRoy .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 36 (10) :1469-1476
[5]   The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years [J].
Cella, David ;
Yount, Susan ;
Rothrock, Nan ;
Gershon, Richard ;
Cook, Karon ;
Reeve, Bryce ;
Ader, Deborah ;
Fries, James F. ;
Bruce, Bonnie ;
Rose, Mattias .
MEDICAL CARE, 2007, 45 (05) :S3-S11
[6]   Validation of Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for Hallux Valgus [J].
Chen, Lan ;
Lyman, Stephen ;
Do, Huong ;
Karlsson, Jon ;
Adam, Stephanie P. ;
Young, Elizabeth ;
Deland, Jonathan T. ;
Ellis, Scott J. .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 33 (12) :1145-1155
[7]   Minimally Important Difference in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Hallux Valgus Surgery [J].
Desai, Sameer ;
Peterson, Alexander C. ;
Wing, Kevin ;
Younger, Alastair ;
Crump, Trafford ;
Liu, Guiping ;
Veljkovic, Andrea ;
Penner, Murray ;
Sutherland, Jason M. .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 40 (06) :694-701
[8]   Ankle osteoarthritis scale [J].
Domsic, RT ;
Saltzman, CL .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 19 (07) :466-471
[9]   The Patient-centered Outcomes Research Institute's Role in Advancing Methods for Patient-centered Outcomes Research [J].
Fleurence, Rachael ;
Whicher, Danielle ;
Dunham, Kelly ;
Gerson, Jason ;
Newhouse, Robin ;
Luce, Bryan .
MEDICAL CARE, 2015, 53 (01) :2-8
[10]   Patient Reported Outcomes in Orthopaedics [J].
Gagnier, Joel J. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (10) :2098-2108