Validation and evaluation of the CPFD modeling of dense particle flow velocity: Taking particle flow around an obstacle as an example

被引:13
|
作者
Liu, Xiandong [1 ]
Zhang, Hai [1 ]
Yang, Hairui [1 ]
Zhang, Yang [1 ]
Lyu, Junfu [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Energy & Power Engn, Key Lab Thermal Sci & Power Engn, Minist Educ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Dense particle flow; Flow around an obstacle; Stained -particle image velocimetry; Computational particle fluid dynamics; Particle velocity distribution; CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED-BED; GAS-SOLIDS FLOW; GRANULAR FLOW; SIMULATION; TUBES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2022.139719
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The computational particle fluid dynamic (CPFD) method is a common approach to simulating dense particle flow, but the direct validation of the CPFD model using the particle velocity distribution is lacking. Taking particle flow around an obstacle as an example, the accuracy of the CPFD method in the simulation of the dense particle velocity field was validated and evaluated in the present study. The particle flow field was experimentally visualized using a quasi-2D flow channel and the particle velocity distribution was measured by a newly-proposed stained-particle image velocimetry technique. The simulated particle velocity using the CPFD method was compared with the measured data and the results indicated that the CPFD method was capable of accurately predicting the particle flow velocity distribution as well as the overall parameters such as the apparent mass flux if the CPFD model parameters were properly adopted. The sensitivity analysis of the simulated particle velocity to the key CPFD parameters was conducted and the results showed that the simulated particle velocity distribution was quite sensitive to the particle pack volume fraction, while the particle stress model parameters and particle-to-wall restitution coefficients show less and close sensitivity in the dense particle flow situations. The recommended model parameters were given in the present study. It is also found that multiple choices of the model parameter combinations could all give accurate overall mass flow predictions but might lead to very different flow velocity distributions with a prediction error even higher than 45%. One should directly verify the CPFD simulated flow velocity using the experimental data if the flow field study was desired.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Characterizing drift velocity for two-phase flow using particle image velocimetry
    Araoye, A. A.
    Ahmed, W. H.
    Al Sarkhi, A.
    Bamidele, O.
    Badr, H. M.
    Alsurakji, I. H.
    ADVANCES IN FLUID MECHANICS XI, 2016, 105 : 87 - 97
  • [42] Particle velocity profiles and residence time distribution in mixed-flow grain dryers
    Iroba, Kingsley Lawrence
    Mellmann, Jochen
    Weigler, Fabian
    Metzger, Thomas
    Tsotsas, Evangelos
    GRANULAR MATTER, 2011, 13 (02) : 159 - 168
  • [43] Inertial particle velocity and distribution in vertical turbulent channel flow: A numerical and experimental comparison
    Wang, Guiquan
    Fong, Kee Onn
    Coletti, Filippo
    Capecelatro, Jesse
    Richter, David H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2019, 120
  • [44] Mathematical modeling and experimental analysis of coupled particle and jet flow rock breaking
    Ren F.-S.
    Cheng X.-Z.
    Li Y.
    Wang B.-J.
    Zhu A.-H.
    Zhao L.
    Ren, Fu-Shen (renfushen@126.com), 2017, Tsinghua University (34): : 249 - 256
  • [45] Smoothed particle hydrodynamics - A new approach for modeling flow in oscillatory baffled reactors
    Jimeno, Guillermo
    Lee, Yeaw Chu
    Ni, Xiong-Wei
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 124 : 14 - 27
  • [46] Smoothed particle hydrodynamics for coarse-grained modeling of rapid granular flow
    Deng, Lijuan
    Wang, Wei
    PARTICUOLOGY, 2015, 21 : 173 - 178
  • [47] Multiscale Modeling for Polymeric Flow: Particle-Fluid Bridging Scale Methods
    Murashima, Takahiro
    Yasuda, Shugo
    Taniguchi, Takashi
    Yamamoto, Ryoichi
    JOURNAL OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2013, 82 (01)
  • [48] Multiphase smoothed particle hydrodynamics modeling of diffusive flow through porous media
    Li, Xu
    Yuan, Dekui
    Zhang, Zhibo
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2021, 33 (10)
  • [49] Groundwater flow modeling and particle tracking for chemical transport in the southern Voltaian aquifers
    Yidana, Sandow Mark
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2011, 63 (04) : 709 - 721
  • [50] Experimental validation of a particle-based method for heat transfer incorporating interstitial gas conduction in dense granular flow using a rotary drum
    Hobbs, Andrew M.
    Ooi, Jin Y.
    Adepu, Manogna
    Emady, Heather
    ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 33 (02)