Benefit-cost analysis of becoming certified pollinator friendly

被引:2
作者
Penn, Jerrod [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Wuyang [3 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[2] LSU AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Bee campus; Benefit -cost analysis; Contingent valuation; Information effect; Net present value; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; RESOURCE QUALITY INFORMATION; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; NON-RESIDENTS; PREFERENCES; DECLINE; CONSEQUENTIALITY; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116679
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite significant drop in pollinator abundance, no studies exist on the benefits and costs of pollinator con-servation in the public domain. An in-person survey was conducted at three large, public US universities to estimate benefits to become Bee Campus USA certified. We test whether different types of reminders on existing student sustainability fees affect Willingness to Pay. Costs of achieving this certification per university were obtained. Net Present Value demonstrates that the net benefits to each school are largely positive, except under the most restrictive assumption. Information reminders of existing fees lead to little change in support of pollinator conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Conscious and Nonconscious Comparisons with Price Anchors: Effects on Willingness to Pay for Related and Unrelated Products [J].
Adaval, Rashmi ;
Wyer, Robert S., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (02) :355-365
[2]  
Alberini A., 2005, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V48, P155
[3]  
Arrow K., 1993, Federal Register
[4]   Pollinator importance networks illustrate the crucial value of bees in a highly speciose plant community [J].
Ballantyne, Gavin ;
Baldock, Katherine C. R. ;
Rendell, Luke ;
Willmer, P. G. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[5]  
Bateman I.J., 2002, EC VALUATION STATED
[6]   Trading taxes vs. paying taxes to value and finance public environmental goods [J].
Bergstrom, JC ;
Boyle, KJ ;
Yabe, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2004, 28 (04) :533-549
[7]   Resource quality information and validity of willingness to pay in contingent valuation [J].
Blomquist, GC ;
Whitehead, JC .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1998, 20 (02) :179-196
[8]   Eliciting Willingness to Pay without Bias using Follow-up Certainty Statements: Comparisons between Probably/Definitely and a 10-point Certainty Scale [J].
Blomquist, Glenn C. ;
Blumenschein, Karen ;
Johannesson, Magnus .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2009, 43 (04) :473-502
[9]   A stated preference valuation of the non-market benefits of pollination services in the UK [J].
Breeze, T. D. ;
Bailey, A. P. ;
Potts, S. G. ;
Balcombe, K. G. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 111 :76-85
[10]   Decline of monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico: is the migratory phenomenon at risk? [J].
Brower, Lincoln P. ;
Taylor, Orley R. ;
Williams, Ernest H. ;
Slayback, Daniel A. ;
Zubieta, Raul R. ;
Isabel Ramirez, M. .
INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2012, 5 (02) :95-100