Ophthalmologic Care of Former Preterm and Full-Term Infants during Their Childhood and Adolescence - A Retrospective View of Their Parents

被引:0
|
作者
Fiess, Achim [1 ]
Wacker, Annika [1 ]
Gissler, Sandra [1 ]
Fauer, Agnes [1 ]
Mildenberger, Eva [2 ]
Urschitz, Michael S. [3 ]
Elflein, Heike Maria [1 ]
Stoffelns, Bernhard M. [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Norbert [1 ]
Schuster, Alexander K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Main, Univ Klinikum, Klin & Poliklin Augenheilkunde, Langenbeckstr 1, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med, Klin Kinderheilkunde, Abt Neonatol, Mainz, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Univ Med, Inst Med Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Abt Padiatr Epidemiol, Mainz, Germany
关键词
gestational age; birth weight; retinopathy of prematurity; ophthalmic care; epidemiology; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; FOLLOW-UP; VISUAL-ACUITY; CHILDREN; RETINOPATHY; AMBLYOPIA; PREMATURITY; STRABISMUS; THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1890-5148
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background The aim of the present study was to evaluate the ophthalmologic care in childhood and adolescence of infants born preterm and full-term from the retrospective point of view of their parents. Methodology The Gutenberg Prematurity Eye Study (GPES) is a retrospective cohort study with a prospective ophthalmologic examination of persons born preterm and full-term between 1969 and 2002 (now aged 18 to 52 years), and asks their parents about the ophthalmologic care received by their children in childhood and adolescence from their retrospective perspective. Participants and their parents were grouped into those with normal gestational age (GA) >= 37 (control group), preterm born infants without retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and gestational age (GA) 33-36 (group 2), GA 29-32 (group 3), GA <= 28 weeks (group 4), and those with ROP without treatment (group 5) and with ROP with treatment (group 6). Parents of participants were interviewed about the ophthalmic care received by their children. Results In total, data from 57 full-term and 131 preterm infants and their parents were included in the present study. The parents of the participants reported that ophthalmologic examination had taken place until 6 years of age in the respective groups 1 to 6 in 22/57 (38.6%), 33/58 (56.9%), 22/38 (57.9%), 3/6 (50%), 19/21 (90.5%), and 7/8 (87.5%). Overall, between 83% and 100% of parents in the different groups reported that ophthalmologic care had been adequate. A change of ophthalmologist due to dissatisfaction with treatment was reported by a total of 4/57 (7%), 9/58 (15.5%), 8/38 (21.1 %), 1/6 (16.7%), 1/21 (4.8%) and 2/8 (25%) in the respective groups. Discussion The present study demonstrates adequate satisfaction and good treatment regarding ophthalmologic care of former preterm children from the parents' perspective. Especially parents of children with ROP rated the treatment positively.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 304
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Motor development evaluated by Test of Infant Motor Performance: comparison between preterm and full-term infants
    Guimaraes, Carmen L. N.
    Reinaux, Cyda M.
    Botelho, Ana C. G.
    Lima, Geisy M. S.
    Cabral Filho, Jose E.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 15 (05) : 357 - 362
  • [42] Neurobehavior in low-risk very preterm infants with low medical risk and full-term infants
    Pineda, Roberta
    Liszka, Lara
    Tran, Pido
    Kwon, Jenny
    Inder, Terrie
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (10) : 1400 - 1408
  • [43] Kinematic analysis of kicking movements in preterm infants with very low birth weight and full-term infants
    Jeng, SF
    Chen, LC
    Yau, KIT
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (02): : 148 - 159
  • [44] Anxiety, Depression, and Behavioral and/or Conduct Disorder in Adolescence Among Former Preterm and Term Infants of Different Race and Ethnicities
    ElHassan, Nahed O.
    Hall, Richard W.
    Thomas, Billy R.
    Palmer, Timothy W.
    Kaiser, Jeffrey R.
    Li, Chenghui
    JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES, 2023, 10 (03) : 1379 - 1391
  • [45] Development of neonatal high-risk preterm infants in comparison to full-term counterparts
    Rodrigues, Juliana Cunha de Lima
    Gaspardo, Claudia Maria
    Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins
    APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-CHILD, 2022, 11 (04) : 840 - 849
  • [46] Temperamental Susceptibility to Parenting among Preterm and Full-Term Infants in Early Cognitive Development
    Gueron-Sela, Noa
    Atzaba-Poria, Naama
    Meiri, Gal
    Marks, Kyla
    INFANCY, 2016, 21 (03) : 312 - 331
  • [47] Differences Between Preterm and Full-Term Infants in Electroencephalogram Power Spectral Density Slope
    Hammond, Jennifer
    Sahni, Rakesh
    Grieve, Philip
    Isler, Joseph
    Werner, Elizabeth
    Ostlund, Brendan
    Alschuler, Daniel
    Lee, Seonjoo
    Monk, Catherine
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2024, 66 (08)
  • [48] Infants born preterm and infants born full-term generate more selective leg joint movement during the scaffolded mobile task
    Kim, Jeong Ah
    Fetters, Linda
    Kubo, Masayoshi
    Havens, Kathryn L.
    Eckel, Sandrah P.
    Sargent, Barbara
    INFANCY, 2021, 26 (05) : 756 - 769
  • [49] Bone status and associated factors measured by quantitative ultrasound in preterm and full-term newborn infants
    Chen, Hsiu-Lin
    Tseng, Hsing-I
    Yang, San-Nan
    Yang, Rei-Cheng
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 88 (08) : 617 - 622
  • [50] Emotion regulation and cortisol response to the still-face procedure in preterm and full-term infants
    Ginnell, Lorna
    O'Carroll, Sinead
    Ledsham, Victoria
    Sanchez, Lorena Jimenez
    Stoye, David Q.
    Sullivan, Gemma
    Hall, Jill
    Homer, Natalie Z. M.
    Boardman, James P.
    Fletcher-Watson, Sue
    Reynolds, Rebecca M.
    PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 141