The role of multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Jung, Nathan [1 ]
DiNatale, Renzo G. [1 ]
Frankel, Jason [2 ]
Koenig, Hannah [1 ]
Ho, On [1 ]
Flores, John Paul [3 ]
Porter, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol & Renal Transplantat Serv, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] SLU Care Urol, Urol, 6400 Clayton Rd, Clayton, MO 63177 USA
[3] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Dept Med, Hematol & Oncol Serv, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
关键词
Imaging-guided biopsy; Multiparametric MRI; Prostate cancer; Sensitivity and specificity; Ultrasonography; SHEAR-WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; TARGETED BIOPSY; LESIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-04122-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Transrectal ultrasound (US) imaging is paramount to the successful completion of prostate biopsies. Certain US features have been associated with prostate cancer (PCa), but their utility remains controversial. We explored the role of multiparametric US (mpUS) in the detection of clinically significant PCa. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study to contrast the findings of prostate MRI and mpUS. Patients who underwent MRI, US and biopsy between 2015 and 2021 were included. Biopsies were performed using a systematic approach (12 cores), as well as with MRI (4 cores/lesion) and US (1 core/lesion) targeting. The US features analyzed consisted of: calcifications, hypoechoic lesions and power or color Doppler positivity. Gleason 3 + 4 or higher was used as to define true positives. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for the different imaging modalities. Results The final cohort included 74 patients, of which 24 (32.4%) had clinically significant PCa. The concordance between MRI and US was 63.5%. Seven individuals with discordant results had clinically significant PCa. MRI alone was more sensitive (87.5% vs 75%) but less specific (28% vs 32%) than US alone. An all-inclusive approach considering any suspicious US or MRI finding had a sensitivity of 95.8%. A more restrictive approach, targeting lesions noted in both US and MRI, yielded the highest specificity (50.0%) and accuracy (55.4%). Conclusion Biopsy targeting based on US findings can provide additional diagnostic information that may increase sensitivity or specificity. Additional research into this topic could open the door to a more personalized approach to prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 671
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Nathan Jung
    Renzo G. DiNatale
    Jason Frankel
    Hannah Koenig
    On Ho
    John Paul Flores
    Christopher Porter
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 663 - 671
  • [2] Can transrectal prostate ultrasound compete with multiparametric MRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Grey, Alistair D. R.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Tam, Joseph
    Loch, Tillmann
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1492 - 1500
  • [3] Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Postema, Arnoud
    Mischi, Massimo
    de la Rosette, Jean
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (11) : 1651 - 1659
  • [4] Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04) : 597 - 606
  • [5] Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Kim, Michelle M.
    Wu, Shulin
    Lin, Sharron X.
    Crotty, Rory K.
    Cornejo, Kristine M.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    Feldman, Adam S.
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (10) : 451.e9 - 451.e14
  • [6] Multiparametric ultrasound of prostate: role in prostate cancer diagnosis
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Lenon, Maria Sarah L.
    Ramacciotti, Lorenzo Storino
    Medina, Luis G.
    Sayegh, Aref S.
    Rincon, Anibal La Riva
    Perez, Laura C.
    Ghoreifi, Alireza
    Lizana, Maria
    Jadvar, Donya S.
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2022, 14
  • [7] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Ingole, Sarang M.
    Mehta, Rajeev U.
    Kazi, Zubair N.
    Bhuyar, Rutuja, V
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (01): : 65 - 77
  • [8] Multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer: novel scoring systems
    Chen, Tong
    Wang, Fei
    Chen, Hanbing
    Wang, Meng
    Liu, Peiqing
    Liu, Songtao
    Zhou, Yibin
    Ma, Qi
    BMC UROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [9] Multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer: novel scoring systems
    Tong Chen
    Fei Wang
    Hanbing Chen
    Meng Wang
    Peiqing Liu
    Songtao Liu
    Yibin Zhou
    Qi Ma
    BMC Urology, 22
  • [10] Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Chaloupka, M.
    Bischoff, R.
    Pfitzinger, P.
    Lellig, E.
    Ledderose, S.
    Buchner, A.
    Schlenker, B.
    Stief, C.
    Clevert, D-A
    Apfelbeck, M.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2019, 73 (01) : 105 - 111