Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a hybrid renewable energy system with hydrogen fuel cells

被引:17
作者
Qi, Xinrui [1 ]
Kochan, Orest [2 ]
Ma, Zhenjun [3 ]
Siarry, Patrick [4 ]
Krolczyk, Grzegorz [6 ]
Li, Z. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Sch Engn, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[2] Lviv Polytech Natl Univ, Dept Telecommun, UA-79013 Lvov, Ukraine
[3] Univ Wollongong, Sustainable Bldg Res Ctr, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[4] Univ Paris Est Creteil Val De Marne, Lab Images Signals & Intelligent Syst, F-94010 Creteil, France
[5] Donghai Lab, Zhoushan 316021, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[6] Opole Univ Technol, Fac Mech Engn, PL-45758 Opole, Poland
关键词
Exergoeconomic; Exergoenvironmental analysis; Renewable energy systems; Energy storage; SOLAR POWER; HEAT; CYCLE; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; MULTIGENERATION; COLLECTORS; DESIGN; CPV/T;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.163
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this study, the energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental (4E) analyses of a cogeneration system that combines photovoltaic thermal panels (PV/T), evacuated tube solar collectors, an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and energy storage systems are performed. The cogeneration model is built to meet the load demand of independent houses in remote areas and avoids excessive consumption of traditional energy and environmental pollution. Here, the exergoenvironmental analysis adopts the Eco-indicator-99 method and the all life cycle assessment method is used to calculate the environmental impact of each component. Two comparative studies are conducted to the 4E analyses. The first one compares the comprehensive performance of the battery storage and hydrogen production for energy storage. The results indicate that the cogeneration system using both batteries and hydrogen production for energy storage has the best overall performance. According the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses, its environmental impact is 23.6% lower than the cogeneration system using batteries alone and the PV/T can be fully utilized. In addition, the total cost rate is 6.2% lower than the cogeneration system using hydrogen production alone. The second case investigates the effect of adding the evacuated tube solar collectors between the PV/T and ORC on the cogeneration system. The analysis results demonstrate that the evacuated tube solar collectors can increase the heat source temperature of the ORC to increase the power generation of the ORC by 37.14%; however, the total cost rate of the cogeneration system increases by 3.7% and the environmental impact rate increases by 19.8%.(c) 2023 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 634
页数:18
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Multi-objective optimization of a novel solar-based multigeneration energy system [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2014, 108 :576-591
[2]   A combined CPV/T and ORC solar power generation system integrated with geothermal cooling and electrolyser/fuel cell storage unit [J].
Al-Nimr, Moh'd A. ;
Bukhari, Mohammad ;
Mansour, Mansour .
ENERGY, 2017, 133 :513-524
[3]   Energy and exergy analyses and electricity generation of PV-T combined with a solar collector for varying mass flow rate and ambient temperature [J].
Atiz, Ayhan ;
Erden, Mustafa ;
Karakilcik, Mehmet .
HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2022, 58 (07) :1263-1278
[4]   Assessment of electricity and hydrogen production performance of evacuated tube solar collectors [J].
Atiz, Ayhan ;
Karakilcik, Hatice ;
Erden, Mustafa ;
Karakilcik, Mehmet .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (27) :14137-14144
[5]   A conceptual process design towards CO2 emission reduction by integration of solar-based hydrogen production and injection into biomass-derived solid oxide fuel cell [J].
Cao, Yan ;
Alsharif, Sameer ;
Attia, El-Awady ;
Shamseldin, Mohamed A. ;
Ibrahim, Banar Fareed .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2022, 164 :164-176
[6]   Hydrogen production using solar energy and injection into a solid oxide fuel cell for CO2 emission reduction; Thermoeconomic assessment and tri-objective optimization [J].
Cao, Yan ;
Dhahad, Hayder A. ;
ABo-Khalil, Ahmed G. ;
Sharma, Kamal ;
Mohammed, Adil Hussein ;
Anqi, Ali E. ;
El-Shafay, A. S. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 50
[7]   Energy, exergy and exergoenvironmental (3E) analyses of power plant integrated with heliostats solar field [J].
Cavalcanti, Eduardo J. C. ;
Azevedo, Jonathan L. B. .
JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 43 (04)
[8]  
Chai Z, 2022, Electronic Components and Information Technology, V6, P16, DOI [10.19772/j.cnki.2096-4455.2022.9.005, DOI 10.19772/J.CNKI.2096-4455.2022.9.005]
[9]   Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system and the feasibility evaluation of integrating with a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer (PEME) [J].
Chitsaz, Ata ;
Haghghi, Maghsoud Abdollahi ;
Hosseinpour, Javad .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 186 :487-499
[10]  
Chong D, 2022, Heat Vent Air Cond, V52, P129, DOI [10.19991/j.hvac1971.2022.07.20, DOI 10.19991/J.HVAC1971.2022.07.20]