A Systematic Review of the Effects of Advance Care Planning Interventions in Nursing Homes

被引:1
|
作者
Burks, Collin E. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Salaami, Omid [1 ,2 ]
Cantrell, Sarah E. [3 ]
Sharda, Neema K. [1 ]
Mbbs, Mamata Yanamadala [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Div Geriatr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Durham Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Geriatr Res Educ & Clin Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Duke Univ Med Ctr Lib & Arch, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Box 3003, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
Advance care planning; nursing homes; systematic review; RESIDENTS; DEMENTIA; IMPLEMENTATION; DEFINITION; FAMILY; VIDEO; GOALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2023.09.018
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) interventions are implemented to achieve outcomes such as improving end-of-life care and increasing goal-concordant care. ACP has been studied across various settings, but it is important to study the impacts of ACP in nursing homes.Objective: To review and evaluate the outcomes of ACP interventions in nursing homes.Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Methods: A search was last performed on March 27, 2023, using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that studied the impact of ACP interventions in nursing homes with residents over the age of 18. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 was used to determine the studies' risk of bias. The ACP Outcomes Framework was utilized to organize the results into 5 domains: Process, Action, Quality of Care, Health Status, and Health Care Utilization. No meta-analysis was possible because of heterogeneity in study interventions and outcomes.Results: Twenty-three studies met criteria for inclusion in this review. Most studies were at low or medium risk of bias. The study interventions included resident and family education, staff education, structured discussions, communication with primary medical teams, and use of specialists. A slight majority of Action and Process outcomes were positive, whereas Quality of Care outcomes were mixed. A minority of Health Care Utilization and Health Status outcomes were positive. Multi-component interventions and interventions featuring staff education were often successful. Conclusions: ACP interventions in nursing homes yield beneficial outcomes in some domains. Limitations to this review include the presence of heterogeneity in types of study interventions and outcomes, as well as underpowering of many study outcomes. Further work is needed to improve ACP implementation, identify which interventions are most beneficial, and ensure sustainability of beneficial interventions.(c) 2023 AMDA The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1809 / 1819.e4
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Shared decision-making in advance care planning for persons with dementia in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study
    Goossens, Bart
    Sevenants, Aline
    Declercq, Anja
    Van Audenhove, Chantal
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [32] Advance care planning, palliative care, and end-of-life care interventions for homeless people: A systematic review
    Sumalinog, Rafael
    Harrington, Katy
    Dosani, Naheed
    Hwang, Stephen W.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (02) : 109 - 119
  • [33] Exploring the Role of Nurses in Advance Care Planning Within Long-Term Care Homes: A Qualitative Study
    Punia, Harveer
    Kaasalainen, Sharon
    Ploeg, Jenny
    Strachan, Patricia
    Sussman, Tamara
    SAGE OPEN NURSING, 2024, 10
  • [34] Interventions to Improve Transitional Care Between Nursing Homes and Hospitals: A Systematic Review
    LaMantia, Michael A.
    Scheunemann, Leslie P.
    Viera, Anthony J.
    Busby-Whitehead, Jan
    Hanson, Laura C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2010, 58 (04) : 777 - 782
  • [35] Effectiveness of advance care planning programmes in improving end-of-life outcomes for individuals with dementia and their caregivers in nursing homes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lo, Yu-Tai
    Chen, Yi-Jhen
    Wu, Jheng-Yan
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [36] Exploration of the acceptability and usability of advance care planning tools in long term care homes
    Sussman, Tamara
    Kaasalainen, Sharon
    Bimman, Rennie
    Punia, Harveer
    Edsell, Nathaniel
    Sussman, Jess
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [37] Components of the Advance Care Planning Process in the Nursing Home Setting
    Mayahara, Masako
    Miller, Arlene Michaels
    O'Mahony, Sean
    JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2018, 20 (01) : 95 - 102
  • [38] BABEL (Better tArgeting, Better outcomes for frail Elderly patients) advance care planning: a comprehensive approach to advance care planning in nursing homes: a cluster randomised trial
    Garland, Allan
    Keller, Heather
    Quail, Patrick
    Boscart, Veronique
    Heyer, Michelle
    Ramsey, Clare
    Vucea, Vanessa
    Choi, Nora
    Bains, Ikdip
    King, Seema
    Oshchepkova, Tatiana
    Kalashnikova, Tatiana
    Kroetsch, Brittany
    Steer, Jessica
    Heckman, George
    AGE AND AGEING, 2022, 51 (03)
  • [39] Advance care planning and hospital in the nursing home
    Caplan, Gideon A.
    Meller, Anne
    Squires, Barbara
    Chan, Stella
    Willett, Wendy
    AGE AND AGEING, 2006, 35 (06) : 581 - 585
  • [40] Advance care planning in Norwegian nursing homes - limited awareness of the residents' preferences and values? A qualitative study
    Thoresen, Lisbeth
    Pedersen, Reidar
    Lillemoen, Lillian
    Gjerberg, Elisabeth
    Forde, Reidun
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2019, 19 (01)