Are We Practicing What We Preach? Family Partnership in Therapeutic Residential Care for Children and Youth

被引:0
作者
Herbell, Kayla [1 ,7 ]
McNamara, Trish [2 ]
Cresswell, Caroline [3 ]
Price, Matt [4 ]
Sweeney, Millie [5 ]
Bellonci, Christopher [6 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Nursing, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Social Work Ctr Hlth Serv & Clin Res, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Hertfordshire, Hatfield, England
[4] Univ Kentucky, Sch Social Work, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Family Run Execut Director Leadership Assoc, Columbia, MD USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[7] Ohio State Univ, Coll Nursing, 1585 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Family engagement; residential care; family involvement; residential treatment; youth; MENTAL-HEALTH; OUTCOMES; PARENTS; CAREGIVERS; PERMANENCY; PLACEMENT; CONTINUUM; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1080/0886571X.2023.2217530
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study presents a tiered conceptualization of family partnership developed by the Family-Run Executive Director Leadership Association (FREDLA) with examples of strategies from the literature. This sub-study was part of an overarching systematic review project that aimed to review the literature on family partnership in relation to youth outcomes. The tiers of family partnership include family involvement (i.e. family's inclusion in their child's care); family engagement (i.e. collaboration between TRC and families); family-driven (i.e. families as full partners). This review included thirty studies (n = 23 family involvement, n = 7 family engagement, n = 0 family-driven). The most common family involvement methods were family therapy and family visits to the program, primarily, delivered face-to-face. The most common family engagement method was activities, therapies, and skill building occurring at the home with family present. Methods of measuring family partnership primarily included the use of administrative data. Implications for research and practice include the provision of research that evaluates the effects of family partnership on outcomes important in the TRC setting and the development of research-practice and family-research collaborations to increase the uptake of effective family partnering methods.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 23
页数:22
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Peer Models in Mental Health for Caregivers and Families
    Acri, Mary
    Hooley, Cole D.
    Richardson, Nicole
    Moaba, Lily B.
    [J]. COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2017, 53 (02) : 241 - 249
  • [2] American Association of Childrens Residential Centers, 2009, RESID TREAT CHILD YO, V26, P252, DOI [10.1080/08865710903459221, DOI 10.1080/08865710903459221]
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, RESID TREAT CHILD YO, V26, P226, DOI DOI 10.1080/08865710903256221
  • [4] BAKER BL, 1993, AM J MENT RETARD, V98, P368
  • [5] Blau GM, 2010, CHILD WELFARE, V89, P21
  • [6] Building Bridges Initiative, 2015, FIND ENG FAM YOUTH R
  • [7] Building Bridges Initiative, 2012, ENG US GUID WRITT FA
  • [8] Carey AllisonC., 2019, DISABILITY STUDIES Q, V39, DOI DOI 10.18061/DSQ.V39I1.6281
  • [9] Carlo P., 1993, J SOC SERV RES, V17, P135, DOI https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v17n01_07
  • [10] Patient And Family Engagement: A Framework For Understanding The Elements And Developing Interventions And Policies
    Carman, Kristin L.
    Dardess, Pam
    Maurer, Maureen
    Sofaer, Shoshanna
    Adams, Karen
    Bechtel, Christine
    Sweeney, Jennifer
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2013, 32 (02) : 223 - 231