Driving Behavior Risk Measurement and Cluster Analysis Driven by Vehicle Trajectory Data

被引:7
作者
Chen, Shuyi [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Kun [3 ]
Yang, Junheng [2 ]
Zang, Xiaodong [2 ]
Luo, Qiang [2 ]
Li, Jiahao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Mech & Elect Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Commun Planning & Design Inst Grp Co Ltd, Guangzhou 510507, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
traffic safety; driving behavior; risk measurement; CRITIC weighting method; cluster analysis;
D O I
10.3390/app13095675
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The correct identification and timely pre-warning of driving behavior risks can remind drivers to correct their unsafe driving behaviors effectively. First of all, four risk evaluation indicators of driving behavior were defined based on lateral and longitudinal driving characteristics: the lateral stability indicator, the longitudinal stability indicator, the car-following risk indicator, and the lane-changing risk indicator. The Pearson correlation coefficient method was used to analyze the correlation of the four indicators, and the conclusion showed that the four indicators were very weakly correlated or presented an irrelevant correlation. Thus, the four indicators can describe different driving behavior risks. Secondly, the criteria importance through intercriteria correlation (CRITIC) method was used to determine the weight of each indicator, and a comprehensive measurement model of driving behavior risk was established. To test the model, this study preprocessed the trajectory data of small vehicles in Lanes 1-5 of the I-80 Expressway from the NGSIM dataset, collected statistical analysis results of vehicle speed and acceleration, and obtained the parameters data required for risk assessment. Then, based on the obtained trajectory data, the variation laws and the thresholds of the four indicators were determined by using the interquartile difference method. Finally, by using the K-means clustering algorithm, the risk types of driving behavior were divided into four categories, namely, dangerous, aggressive, safe, and conservative. The dangerous, aggressive, safe, and conservative driving behaviors accounted for 5.40%, 23.30%, 43.22%, and 28.08% of the total samples, respectively. The expert's assessment results of the driving behavior risk aligned with the results obtained from the model measurements. This indicated that the driving behavior risk measurement model here described can evaluate a driver's risk status in real time, provide safety tips for the driver, and offer theoretical support for driving safety warning systems.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Abdi H., 2010, Encyclopedia of Research Design, DOI [10.1007/BF02289823, DOI 10.4135/9781412961288.N168]
  • [2] CMetric: A Driving Behavior Measure using Centrality Functions
    Chandra, Rohan
    Bhattacharya, Uttaran
    Mittal, Trisha
    Bera, Aniket
    Manocha, Dinesh
    [J]. 2020 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2020, : 2035 - 2042
  • [3] Risky Driving Behavior Recognition Based on Vehicle Trajectory
    Chen, Shengdi
    Xue, Qingwen
    Zhao, Xiaochen
    Xing, Yingying
    Lu, Jian John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (23)
  • [4] Performance evaluation of the GIS-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naive Bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Shuai
    Li, Renwei
    Shahabi, Himan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 644 : 1006 - 1018
  • [5] Collin A, 2020, IEEE INT VEH SYM, P136, DOI 10.1109/IV47402.2020.9304588
  • [6] Curtis Alexander E, 2016, Aorta (Stamford), V4, P124, DOI 10.12945/j.aorta.2016.16.014
  • [7] Lateral Oscillation Characteristics of Vehicle Trajectories on the Straight Sections of Freeways
    Ding, Rui
    Pan, Cunshu
    Dai, Zhenhua
    Xu, Jin
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (22):
  • [8] How much can k-means be improved by using better initialization and repeats?
    Franti, Pasi
    Sieranoja, Sami
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2019, 93 : 95 - 112
  • [9] A Scenario-Adaptive Driving Behavior Prediction Approach to Urban Autonomous Driving
    Geng, Xinli
    Liang, Huawei
    Yu, Biao
    Zhao, Pan
    He, Liuwei
    Huang, Rulin
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2017, 7 (04):
  • [10] A study of freeway crash risk prediction and interpretation based on risky driving behavior and traffic flow data
    Guo, Miao
    Zhao, Xiaohua
    Yao, Ying
    Yan, Pengwei
    Su, Yuelong
    Bi, Chaofan
    Wu, Dayong
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2021, 160