Feasibility of Single-Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population

被引:8
作者
Magarinos, Jessica [1 ]
Lutzow, Lynde [1 ]
Dass, Chandra [2 ]
Ma, Grace X. X. [3 ]
Erkmen, Cherie P. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Ctr Asian Hlth, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Thorac Med & Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Temple Univ, Temple Univ Hlth Syst, Lewis Katz Sch Med, Dept Thorac Surg & Med, 3401 N Broad St,Suite 501,Parkinson Pavil, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
lung cancer; lung cancer screening; telemedicine; health care disparities; early detection; DISPARITIES; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1177/10732748221121391
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundCOVID-19 forced a delay of non-essential health services, including lung cancer screening. Our institution developed a single-encounter, telemedicine (SET) lung cancer screening whereby patients receive low-dose CT in-person, but counseling regarding results, coordination of follow-up care and smoking cessation is delivered using telemedicine. This study compares outcomes of SET lung cancer screening to our pre-COVID, single-visit, in-person (SIP) lung cancer screening.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed we recorded independent variables of gender, race/ethnicity, age, educational attainment, smoking status and dependent variables including cancer diagnosis, stage and treatment between March 2019 to July 2021. Using retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes of SIP lung cancer screening before COVID-19 and SET lung cancer screening amid COVID-19.ResultsThere was a significant difference in number of patients screened pre- and amid COVID-19.673 people were screened via SIP, while only 440 were screened via SET. SIP screening consisted of 52.5% Black/African American patients, which decreased to 37% with SET lung cancer screening. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or educational attainment. There was also no significant difference in Lung-RADS score between the 2 methods of screening or diagnostic procedures performed. Ultimately telemedicine based screening diagnosed fewer cancers, 1.6% diagnosed via telemedicine vs 3.3% screened by in person.ConclusionWe implemented SET lung cancer screening to continue lung cancer screening during a global pandemic. Our study established feasibility of telemedicine-based lung cancer screening among our predominantly African American/Black population, though fewer patients were screened. We found no difference in distribution between age, or educational attainment suggesting other factors discouraging lung cancer screening amid COVID-19.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Lung cancer: screening
[3]   Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial A Cost-effectiveness Analysis [J].
Black, William C. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2015, 30 (02) :79-87
[4]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[5]   The impact of income and education on lung cancer screening utilization, eligibility, and outcomes: a narrative review of socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening [J].
Castro, Samuel ;
Sosa, Ernesto ;
Lozano, Vanessa ;
Akhtar, Aamna ;
Love, Kyra ;
Duffels, Jeanette ;
Raz, Dan J. ;
Kim, Jae Y. ;
Sun, Virginia ;
Erhunmwunsee, Loretta .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (06) :3745-3757
[6]   Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part I: National cancer statistics [J].
Cronin, Kathleen A. ;
Lake, Andrew J. ;
Scott, Susan ;
Sherman, Recinda L. ;
Noone, Anne-Michelle ;
Howlader, Nadia ;
Henley, S. Jane ;
Anderson, Robert N. ;
Firth, Albert U. ;
Ma, Jiemin ;
Kohler, Betsy A. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin .
CANCER, 2018, 124 (13) :2785-2800
[7]   This Week in the Journal [J].
de Koning, H. J. ;
van der Aalst, C. M. ;
de Jong, P. A. ;
Scholten, E. T. ;
Nackaerts, K. ;
Heuvelmans, M. A. ;
Lammers, J. -W. J. ;
Weenink, C. ;
Yousaf-Khan, U. ;
Horeweg, N. ;
van't Westeinde, S. ;
Prokop, M. ;
Mali, W. P. ;
Hoesein, F. A. A. Mohamed ;
van Ooijen, P. M. A. ;
Aerts, J. G. J. V. ;
den Bakker, M. A. ;
Thunnissen, E. ;
Verschakelen, J. ;
Vliegenthart, R. ;
Walter, J. E. ;
ten Haaf, K. ;
Groen, H. J. M. ;
Oudkerk, M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (06) :503-513
[8]   Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: Progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities [J].
DeSantis, Carol E. ;
Siegel, Rebecca L. ;
Sauer, Ann Goding ;
Miller, Kimberly D. ;
Fedewa, Stacey A. ;
Alcaraz, Kassandra I. ;
Jemal, Ahmedin .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (04) :290-308
[9]   Adherence to annual lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scan in a diverse population [J].
Erkmen, Cherie P. ;
Dako, Farouk ;
Moore, Ryan ;
Dass, Chandra ;
Weiner, Mark G. ;
Kaiser, Larry R. ;
Ma, Grace X. .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2021, 32 (03) :291-298
[10]  
Erkmen Cherie P, 2017, Int J Cancer Oncol, V4, DOI 10.15436/2377-0902.17.1469