Metacognitive Illusions: A Positivity Effect in Judgments of Learning for Older but Not Younger Adults

被引:2
|
作者
Sun, Xiaojun [1 ]
Jiang, Yingjie [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Changchun 130024, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
judgments of learning; emotional salience; metamemory; emotion; positivity; aging; IMPACT JUDGMENTS; MEMORY; BELIEFS; PREDICTIONS; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3390/jintelligence11030040
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The positivity effect for metacognitive judgments (judgments of learning, JOLs) of emotional words in recognition memory was shown in older adults, in contrast to younger adults, who typically displayed the emotional salience effect. This is compatible with the socioemotional selection theory, which suggests the presence of a positive stimulus bias in older adults' cognitive processes. This study examined whether the positivity effect and age-related differences could be extended to a picture study to determine whether the positivity effect in older adults is robust in the metacognitive domain. Younger and older adults studied negative, positive, and neutral pictures, followed by JOLs and then a recognition test that asked participants to judge whether the picture was shown in the studying stage or not. Age-related differences were found not only in recognition memory performance for emotional pictures but also in JOLs and their accuracy. Younger adults showed an emotional salience effect for both memory performance and JOLs. Older adults' JOLs showed a positivity effect, but their actual memory performance was influenced by emotion, and this inconsistency between metacognitive judgments and memory performance is a metacognitive illusion. These findings support the cross-material replicability of a positivity bias in older adults in the metacognitive domain and suggest that we should be cautioned about the detrimental effects of this metacognitive illusion in older adults. It illustrates an age difference in the effect of emotion on individual metacognitive monitoring ability.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidence for an Age-Related Positivity Effect in Metacognitive Judgments
    Sanders, Edie C.
    Berry, Jane M.
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2021, 76 (07): : 1282 - 1291
  • [2] Betting on Memory Leads to Metacognitive Improvement by Younger and Older Adults
    McGillivray, Shannon
    Castel, Alan D.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2011, 26 (01) : 137 - 142
  • [3] A Positivity Effect in Older Adults' Memorability Judgments of Pictures
    Tomaszczyk, Jennifer C.
    Fernandes, Myra A.
    EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 2013, 39 (03) : 254 - 274
  • [4] Self-Regulated Learning in Younger and Older Adults: Does Aging Affect Metacognitive Control?
    Price, Jodi
    Hertzog, Christopher
    Dunlosky, John
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2010, 17 (03) : 329 - 359
  • [5] Age-related differences in metacognitive reactivity in younger and older adults
    Murphy, Dillon H.
    Rhodes, Matthew G.
    Castel, Alan D.
    METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2024, 19 (03) : 863 - 877
  • [6] The effects of emotion on younger and older adults' monitoring of learning
    Tauber, Sarah K.
    Dunlosky, John
    Urry, Heather L.
    Opitz, Philipp C.
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2017, 24 (05) : 555 - 574
  • [7] Multiple Bases for Young and Older Adults' Judgments of Learning in Multitrial Learning
    Tauber, Sarah K.
    Rhodes, Matthew G.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2012, 27 (02) : 474 - 483
  • [8] Gaze Bias in Preference Judgments by Younger and Older Adults
    Saito, Toshiki
    Nouchi, Rui
    Kinjo, Hikari
    Kawashima, Ryuta
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 9
  • [9] Younger and older adults weigh multiple cues in a similar manner to generate judgments of learning
    Hines, Jarrod C.
    Hertzog, Christopher
    Touron, Dayna R.
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2015, 22 (06) : 693 - 711
  • [10] Do Judgments of Learning Modify Older Adults' Actual Learning?
    Tauber, Sarah K.
    Witherby, Amber E.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2019, 34 (06) : 836 - 847