How can computable general equilibrium models serve low-carbon policy? A systematic review

被引:21
作者
An, Kangxin [1 ]
Zhang, Shihui [2 ]
Zhou, Jiaxin [1 ]
Wang, Can [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Earth Syst Sci, Key Lab Earth Syst Modeling, Minist Educ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Rio Tinto Joint Res Ctr Resources Energy, Beijing 1000084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
computable general equilibrium; low-carbon policy; impact; systematic review; INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELS; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; HEALTH CO-BENEFITS; EMISSION REDUCTION; CGE ASSESSMENT; AIR-QUALITY; IMPACT; CHINA; ECONOMY; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/acbbe2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Computable general equilibrium (CGE) models have been widely employed in economic, social, and environmental impact assessments for low-carbon policies. As net-zero transition has become a global trend, it is crucial to conduct a systematic review of how CGE models serve low-carbon policies. This review examined 1002 studies published between 2001 and 2021, revealing the application of CGE models in low-carbon policy analysis by researchers in 51 countries, including the United States, China, Western Europe, Japan, and Australia, while studies in Latin America, Central Asia and Eastern Europe are limited. Climate targets, carbon pricing, and energy policy are the main policy focuses of CGE analysis, while land policy, demand-side actions, and several other policies are less studied. In addition, CGE analysis generally focuses on the economic impacts of carbon reduction, with a growing amount of attention on social and environmental consequences. The structure, database, and model coupling techniques of CGE models are becoming more complex in order to serve the increasingly multifaceted and diverse policy study purposes. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the research trends of CGE studies on low-carbon policies, thus improving our understanding on low-carbon policies, multiple impacts, and CGE models. We also identify the gaps and potential cutting-edge techniques of current low-carbon policy research. Future work should improve the capacity of CGE models to simulate actual 'second-best' policies, provide feedback of complex impacts on policy optimization, and enhance dynamic mechanisms on structural change.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland: A computable general equilibrium analysis
    Allan, Grant
    Lecca, Patrizio
    McGregor, Peter
    Swales, Kim
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 100 : 40 - 50
  • [2] Implications of CO2 reduction policies for a high carbon emitting economy
    Asafu-Adjaye, John
    Mahadevan, Renuka
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 38 : 32 - 41
  • [3] Evaluating the effects of policy innovations: Lessons from a systematic review of policies promoting low-carbon technology
    Auld, Graeme
    Mallett, Alexandra
    Burlica, Bozica
    Nolan-Poupart, Francis
    Slater, Robert
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 29 : 444 - 458
  • [4] Application of computable general equilibrium (CGE) to climate change mitigation policy: A systematic review
    Babatunde, Kazeem Alasinrin
    Begum, Rawshan Ara
    Said, Fathin Faizah
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 61 - 71
  • [5] The CO2 abatement game:: Costs, incentives, and the enforceability of a sub-global coalition
    Babiker, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2001, 25 (1-2) : 1 - 34
  • [6] Babiker MH, 2005, ENERG J, V26, P99
  • [7] Meta-Modeling to Assess the Possible Future of Paris Agreement
    Babonneau, Frederic
    Bernard, Alain
    Haurie, Alain
    Vielle, Marc
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (06) : 611 - 626
  • [8] POLICY INSIGHTS FROM THE EMF 32 STUDY ON U.S. CARBON TAX SCENARIOS
    Barron, Alexander R.
    Fawcett, Allen A.
    Hafstead, Marc A. C.
    McFarland, James R.
    Morris, Adele C.
    [J]. CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2018, 9 (01)
  • [9] Operationalizing the net-negative carbon economy
    Bednar, Johannes
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Baklanov, Artem
    Thomson, Marcus
    Wagner, Fabian
    Geden, Oliver
    Allen, Myles
    Hall, Jim W.
    [J]. NATURE, 2021, 596 (7872) : 377 - 383
  • [10] Exploring Low-Carbon Futures: A Web Service Approach to Linking Diverse Climate-Energy-Economy Models
    Belete, Getachew F.
    Voinov, Alexey
    Arto, Inaki
    Dhavala, Kishore
    Bulavskaya, Tatyana
    Niamir, Leila
    Moghayer, Saeed
    Filatova, Tatiana
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (15)