The pandemic and the politics of Australian research governance

被引:1
|
作者
McCarthy, Greg [1 ]
Jayasuriya, Kanishka [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Polit & Int Studies, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[2] Murdoch Univ, Sch Management & Governance, Murdoch, WA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Higher education; pandemic; academic research; Australia; governance; regulations;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2022.2106947
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Following the 1989 unified higher education reforms, the Australian academic research system was built upon the notion of depoliticisation (i.e., keeping the political character of decision at one remove from governance) to govern the contradiction between research credibility and governmental economic priorities. The article argues that the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the tension between independent research and governmental economic priorities. The pandemic, also, weakened university autonomy via the closure of the national border, reducing overseas student fees, a significant source of research funding. The article maintains that the conservative Morrison government used the opportunity to politicise research around commercialisation and national sovereignty. The argument being that the pandemic exposed Australia's research and development (R&D) dependence and with it the question of industrial sovereignty, prompting the government to couple academic research to industry policy. Secondly, the pandemic reinforced the conservative government's aim to concentrate research in selected commercial areas and to exert this priority on to the research funding agency, the Australian Research Council (ARC). Lastly, the article contends that the COVID pandemic, originating in Wuhan, intensified the Morrison government's geopolitical concerns over China, and this disquiet flowed into research policy, which problematised research collaboration with Chinese researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 693
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Problem of Metropolitan Governance and the Politics of Scale
    Cox, Kevin R.
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2010, 44 (02) : 215 - 227
  • [42] GENDER AND GOVERNANCE: THE POLITICS OF FEDERALISM IN MALAYSIA
    Ng, Cecilia
    KAJIAN MALAYSIA, 2012, 30 (02): : 1 - 26
  • [43] Territory, Politics, Governance and Multispatial Metagovernance
    Jessop, Bob
    TERRITORY POLITICS GOVERNANCE, 2016, 4 (01) : 8 - 32
  • [44] New horizons in the politics of water governance
    Challies, Edward
    Tadaki, Marc
    NEW ZEALAND GEOGRAPHER, 2022, 78 (01) : 3 - 8
  • [45] The politics of organising during the pandemic
    Menon, Annapurna
    CRITICAL STUDIES ON SECURITY, 2021, 9 (02) : 150 - 154
  • [46] Governance and remote work in the pandemic era: A study of SUNARP-UCAYALI workers
    Arevalo-Ramos, Liz
    Rios-Rios, Segundo
    Pena-Barrios, Angela
    Ochoa-Paredes, Filiberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 11 (05): : 151 - 155
  • [47] Measuring global pandemic governance: how countries respond to COVID-19
    Bevaola Kusumasari
    MD Enjat Munajat
    Fadhli Zul Fauzi
    Journal of Management and Governance, 2023, 27 : 603 - 629
  • [48] Measuring global pandemic governance: how countries respond to COVID-19
    Kusumasari, Bevaola
    Munajat, Md Enjat
    Fauzi, Fadhli Zul
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & GOVERNANCE, 2023, 27 (02) : 603 - 629
  • [49] Implications of COVID-19 pandemic on the governance of passenger mobility innovations in Europe
    Tsvetkova, Anastasia
    Kulkov, Ignat
    Busquet, Caroline
    Kao, Ping-Jen
    Kamargianni, Maria
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 14
  • [50] The Research on the Social Participation in Higher Education Governance in Macao
    Su Shaodan
    Zhang Hongfeng
    Lv Huan
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION, ICDTE 2021, 2021, : 156 - 162