The Dignity of Legal Subjects

被引:0
作者
Huq, Aziz Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Sociol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
rule of law; dignity; due process; standards;
D O I
10.1093/ojls/gqae004
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The dignitary account of the rule of law proposes that values of human dignity and agency are appropriately recognised through legal rules and institutions that create opportunities for legal subjects to engage in deliberation and the exercise of practical reason. In a collection of essays published over a period of almost two decades, Thoughtfulness and the Rule of Law, Jeremy Waldron offers a comprehensive account of the grounds and institutional implications of taking dignity so understood as a core rule-of-law desideratum. The ensuing account is novel, stimulating and distinct. There is, however, a chasm between the platforms identified by Waldron and his ambition of advancing dignity. Further, a dignity norm cannot supply a plausible evaluative benchmark under all (or most) plausible circumstances. Its domain might in consequence be more circumscribed than Waldron intimates.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 481
页数:21
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Natural Law and Natural Rights
[2]  
Arendt Hannah, 1968, ORIGINS TOTALITARIAN, P286
[3]  
Barro Robert J., 2013, 2013 Index of Economic Freedom, P41
[4]  
Berlin I., 1969, 4 ESSAYS LIBERTY, P118
[5]  
Bingham Lord, 2007, RULE LAW
[7]  
Endicott Timothy AO, 1999, OXFORD J LEGAL STUD, V1, P16
[8]  
Feeley MalcolmM., 1979, PROCESS IS PUNISHMEN
[9]  
Huq AZ, 2017, U PENN LAW REV, V165, P499
[10]  
Huq Aziz Z, 2017, U PENN LAW REV, V165, P531