Data sharing policies in Brazilian Applied Social Sciences journals indexed in SciELO

被引:1
作者
Dias, Carolina Guimaraes de Souza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
ENCONTROS BIBLI-REVISTA ELETRONICA DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO | 2024年 / 29卷
关键词
Scholarly journals; Editorial policies; Open science; Data sharing; Social sciences; RESEARCH TRANSPARENCY; ACCESS; SOCIOLOGY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.5007/1518-2924.2024.e95038
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose of study: Considering the growing importance of open science and the role of journals in disseminating its practices, this study aims to investigate and characterize the data-sharing editorial policies of Brazilian social science scholarly journals listed in the SciELO collection. Methods: This quantitative research performs a descriptive cross-sectional study of the data-sharing editorial policies of a sample of 47 Brazilian journals from Applied Social Sciences included in the SciELO collection in 2022. The method consists of the thematic content analysis of the editorial policies of the publications extracted from the electronic page of each publication in the sample. Eighteen variables are analyzed, 11 referring to the characteristics of the journals and seven related to the features of the policies. Results: The results show that 34% of the titles in the sample have some data sharing policy and, among these, 62.5% have optional policies; 68.7% indicate a repository for data deposit, especially SciELO Data and Zenodo. Where existent, the observed policies are often incomplete or silent regarding the types of data and formats accepted for sharing. Conclusions: The results align with those of the international empirical literature, which point to the lower frequency of data-sharing policies and the prevalence of optional policies in social science journals. New studies are needed to investigate better the correlations between attributes of Brazilian journals and characteristics of existing policies and to monitor the dissemination and maturation of editorial policies for these publications.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 67 条
[51]  
SAYAO L. F., 2021, Informacao digital e suas diversas abordagens pela otica de um cientista da informacao, P285, DOI [10.22477/9786589167136, DOI 10.22477/9786589167136]
[52]  
SCHOPFEL J., 2021, Balisages, V3
[53]  
SCIENCE DIGITAL, 2022, The State of Open Data 2022: The longest-running longitudinal survey and analysis on open data, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.21276984.v5, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.21276984.V5]
[54]  
Shmagun Hanna, 2020, ITM Web of Conferences, V33, DOI 10.1051/itmconf/20203301001
[55]  
Stuart D., 2018, Whitepaper: Practical challenges for researchers in data sharing, DOI [10.6084/m9.figshare.5975011, DOI 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.5975011]
[56]   Research data sharing: Developing a stakeholder-driven model for journal policies [J].
Sturges, Paul ;
Bamkin, Marianne ;
Anders, Jane H. S. ;
Hubbard, Bill ;
Hussain, Azhar ;
Heeley, Melanie .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 66 (12) :2445-2455
[57]   Research Transparency Is on the Rise in Economics [J].
Swanson, Nicholas ;
Christensen, Garret ;
Littman, Rebecca ;
Birke, David ;
Miguel, Edward ;
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy ;
Wang, Zenan .
AEA PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 110 :61-65
[58]   Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines [J].
Tedersoo, Leho ;
Kungas, Rainer ;
Oras, Ester ;
Koster, Kajar ;
Eenmaa, Helen ;
Leijen, Ali ;
Pedaste, Margus ;
Raju, Marju ;
Astapova, Anastasiya ;
Lukner, Heli ;
Kogermann, Karin ;
Sepp, Tuul .
SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2021, 8 (01)
[59]  
THE ROYAL SOCIETY, 2012, The Royal Society Science Policy Centre Report 02/12
[60]   Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition [J].
Vicente-Saez, Ruben ;
Martinez-Fuentes, Clara .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 88 :428-436