Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the Hispanic adult population of South Carolina: a complex mixed-method design evaluation study

被引:6
作者
Rossi, Maria Mercedes [1 ]
Parisi, Michelle A. [2 ]
Cartmell, Kathleen B. [3 ]
Mcfall, Danielle [4 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Food Nutr & Packaging Sci, Pool Agr Ctr C228, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Nutr Sci, 206 Hoke Smith Annex, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Clemson Univ, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 534 Edwards Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[4] Clemson Univ, Rural Hlth & Nutr Program Team, 120 Lehotsky Hall, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
Vaccine hesitancy; COVID-19; Attitudes; Barriers; Participants' perceptions; Focus groups; Mixed method;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-16771-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn August 2021, only 47.6% of all eligible residents in South Carolina (SC) had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with only 41% having completed their vaccination series. Additionally, only 27% of all Hispanics in SC had completed their vaccination series compared to 34.1% of non-Hispanics. Vaccine hesitancy is a complex phenomenon that is context and vaccine-specific. Focusing on unvaccinated Hispanics living in rural areas of SC, this study aimed to identify barriers to vaccination and provide an educational intervention designed to address vaccine hesitancy.MethodsA complex mixed-methods evaluation design was used to conduct this study. First, in-person vaccine educational sessions were implemented, along with a pre-post-test survey, to assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, motivations, barriers, and intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccination. Second, in-person follow-up focus groups were held with the same participants to gather in-depth insight about participants' knowledge and attitudes about the COVID-19 vaccination. Third, an online follow-up survey was conducted to assess the effect of the training and discussion session on COVID-19 vaccination. Study outcomes were assessed among the 17 individuals who participated in the educational sessions and focus group discussions.ResultsFindings revealed that for unvaccinated Hispanics living in South Carolina; vaccine hesitancy was primarily driven by: 1) misinformation and information coming from unverified sources and 2) negative perceptions of the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. Specifically, participants were fearful that the vaccine development was rushed and that the vaccines might contain questionable ingredients that could cause strong side effects or even death. Participants were also concerned that vaccination might cause them to get sick and be hospitalized, which would have financial implications since they could not afford healthcare or take time off work.ConclusionsProgram implementation and mass communication campaigns should focus on COVID-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness, including side effects, what to expect after being vaccinated, and how to look for information from reputable sources. The educational session implemented proved to be effective and helped reduce vaccine hesitancy since most participants (80%) self-reported receiving a COVID-19 vaccine after program participation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Akturk Z., 2021, Eur J Med Health Sci, V3, P95, DOI [10.24018/ejmed.2021.3.4.974, DOI 10.24018/EJMED.2021.3.4.974]
  • [2] Bamberg M, 2023, Impact evaluation notes: introduction to mixed methods in impact evaluation
  • [3] Bender D E, 1994, Health Transit Rev, V4, P63
  • [4] COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-making Factors in Racial and Ethnic Minority Communities in Los Angeles, California
    Carson, Savanna L.
    Casillas, Alejandra
    Castellon-Lopez, Yelba
    Mansfield, Lisa N.
    Morris, D'Ann
    Barron, Juan
    Ntekume, Ejiro
    Landovitz, Raphael
    Vassar, Stefanie D.
    Norris, Keith C.
    Dubinett, Steven M.
    Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
    Brown, Arleen F.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (09)
  • [5] Animated, video entertainment-education to improve vaccine confidence globally during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online randomized controlled experiment with 24,000 participants
    Chen, Simiao
    Forster, Sebastian
    Yang, Juntao
    Yu, Fengyun
    Jiao, Lirui
    Gates, Jennifer
    Wang, Zhuoran
    Liu, Haitao
    Chen, Qiushi
    Geldsetzer, Pascal
    Wu, Peixin
    Wang, Chen
    McMahon, Shannon
    Barnighausen, Till
    Adam, Maya
    [J]. TRIALS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [6] Dillman D.A., 2014, INTERNET PHONE MAIL
  • [7] Engaging Latino Families About COVID-19 Vaccines: A Qualitative Study Conducted in Oregon, USA
    Garcia, Jonathan
    Vargas, Nancy
    de la Torre, Cynthia
    Alvarez, Mario Magana
    Clark, Jesse Lawton
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2021, 48 (06) : 747 - 757
  • [8] How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes
    Guest, Greg
    Namey, Emily
    McKenna, Kevin
    [J]. FIELD METHODS, 2017, 29 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [9] HealthData.gov, 2022, South Carolina state synopsis: state profile report COVID-19
  • [10] Herrman AR., 2022, The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods, P579