Sleeve gastrectomy with one anastomosis bipartition versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: A pilot study

被引:1
|
作者
Qin, Xiaoguang [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Zhongqi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lee, Wei-Jei [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Min [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Shu-Chun [3 ]
Chen, Jung-Chien [3 ]
Wu, Guoqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Wei, Tiantian [1 ]
Huang, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated BenQ Hosp, Bariatr Med Ctr, Suzhou BenQ Med Ctr,Dept Metab, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] China Med Univ, Hsinchu Hosp, Med Weight Loss Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, 899 Ping Hai Rd, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
metabolic surgery; one-anastomosis gastric bypass; SG plus one anastomosis bipartition; OBESE-PATIENTS; EXPERIENCE; PLICATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/ases.13258
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a new recognized metabolic surgery, but the problem that we cannot screen the excluded stomach is a troubling issue in China. The emergence of sleeve gastrectomy plus one anastomosis bipartition (SG + OAB) makes us see a hope to solve this problem.Objectives: By comparing the efficacy of the two surgical methods, to evaluate whether SG + OAB surgery can solve the dilemma faced by OAGB that the excluded stomach cannot be screened.Methods: A retrospective study to compare the patients who underwent OAGB and SG + OAB was conducted. The main outcome measures were (1) operation risk, (2) weight loss, and (3) diabetes remission at 6 months.Results: This study was conducted in the bariatric/metabolic surgical center. From November 2021 to February 2022, a total of 30 patients with obesity who received SG + OAB surgery were recruited. Another matched 60 patients undergoing OAGB were recruited as control group. There was no difference in preoperative age (32.15 +/- 9.02 vs. 34.47 +/- 7.22; p = .224), female ratio (83% vs. 85%; p = .837), and BMI (36.18 +/- 5.30 vs. 34.68 +/- 5.58; p = .217) between the two groups. OAGB had a shorter mean operation time (121.67 +/- 20.41 vs. 143.50 +/- 25.07 min; p < .001) and a lower intraoperative blood loss (21.92 +/- 12.35 vs. 32.43 +/- 22.01 mL; p = .005), but a longer postoperative flatus passage (2.13 +/- 0.43 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.43 days; p = .007) compared with the SG + OAB group. Two patients (6.7%) developed major surgical complication in SG + OAB group but no major complication developed in OAGB group. At 6 months after surgery, SG + OAB had a higher %total weight loss than OAGB (31.05 +/- 3.12 vs. 28.14 +/- 5.43%; p = .015), but diabetes remission rate was similarly high in both groups.Conclusions: SG + OAB operation had a non-inferior or even better weight loss than OAGB, with a similar glycemic control efficacy. However, the high complication rate of SG + OAB is the major drawback that needs attention.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nakanishi, Hayato
    Mosleh, Kamal Abi
    Al-Kordi, Mohammad
    Farsi, Soroush
    Chaudhry, Shahrukh
    Marrero, Katie
    Davis Jr, S. Scott
    Kermansaravi, Mohammad
    Parmar, Chetan
    Clapp, Benjamin
    Ghanem, Omar M.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (03) : 723 - 732
  • [32] One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dimitrios E. Magouliotis
    Vasiliki S. Tasiopoulou
    Alexis A. Svokos
    Konstantina A. Svokos
    Eleni Sioka
    Dimitrios Zacharoulis
    Obesity Surgery, 2017, 27 : 2479 - 2487
  • [33] Clinical outcomes after one anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obese patients
    Sophia M.-T. Schmitz
    Patrick H. Alizai
    Andreas Kroh
    Sandra Schipper
    Jonathan F. Brozat
    Andreas Plamper
    Ulf P. Neumann
    Karl Rheinwalt
    Tom F. Ulmer
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 4401 - 4407
  • [34] Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy with Loop Duodenojejunal Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Type 2 Diabetes: The Role of Pylorus Preservation
    Si, Yiming
    Lin, Shibo
    Guan, Wei
    Shen, Jiajia
    Liang, Hui
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (07) : 2391 - 2398
  • [35] Determinants of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism 1 Year After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Maryam Barzin
    Amir Ebadinejad
    Alireza Khalaj
    Maryam Mahdavi
    Majid Valizadeh
    Farhad Hosseinpanah
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 156 - 163
  • [36] One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass after Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure: Does a Single Procedure Fit for all?
    Francesco Pizza
    Dario D’Antonio
    Juan Antonio Carbonell Asíns
    Francesco Saverio Lucido
    Salvatore Tolone
    Ludovico Docimo
    Chiara Dell’Isola
    Claudio Gambardella
    Obesity Surgery, 2021, 31 : 1722 - 1732
  • [37] Clinical influence of conversion of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy to one anastomosis gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Shlomi Rayman
    Maor Staierman
    Dan Assaf
    Jacob Rachmuth
    Idan Carmeli
    Andrei Keidar
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [38] Long-term outcomes of revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
    Salman AlSabah
    Eliana Al Haddad
    Saud Al-Subaie
    Shehab Ekrouf
    Ahmad Almulla
    Mohannad Alhaddad
    Mais Shiekh Aljabal
    Khaled Alenezi
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [39] One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass after Sleeve Gastrectomy Failure: Does a Single Procedure Fit for all?
    Pizza, Francesco
    D'Antonio, Dario
    Carbonell Asins, Juan Antonio
    Lucido, Francesco Saverio
    Tolone, Salvatore
    Docimo, Ludovico
    Dell'Isola, Chiara
    Gambardella, Claudio
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (04) : 1722 - 1732
  • [40] Short-Term Changes on Body Composition After Sleeve Gastrectomy and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass
    Pakzad, Mohsen
    Miratashi Yazdi, Seyed Amir Miratashi Yazdi
    Talebpour, Mohammad
    Elyasinia, Fezzeh
    Abolhasani, Maryam
    Zabihi-Mahmoudabadi, Hossein
    Najjari, Khosrow
    Geranpayeh, Loabat
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 32 (08): : 884 - 889