Sleeve gastrectomy with one anastomosis bipartition versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: A pilot study

被引:1
|
作者
Qin, Xiaoguang [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Zhongqi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lee, Wei-Jei [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Min [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Shu-Chun [3 ]
Chen, Jung-Chien [3 ]
Wu, Guoqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Wei, Tiantian [1 ]
Huang, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated BenQ Hosp, Bariatr Med Ctr, Suzhou BenQ Med Ctr,Dept Metab, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] China Med Univ, Hsinchu Hosp, Med Weight Loss Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, 899 Ping Hai Rd, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
metabolic surgery; one-anastomosis gastric bypass; SG plus one anastomosis bipartition; OBESE-PATIENTS; EXPERIENCE; PLICATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/ases.13258
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a new recognized metabolic surgery, but the problem that we cannot screen the excluded stomach is a troubling issue in China. The emergence of sleeve gastrectomy plus one anastomosis bipartition (SG + OAB) makes us see a hope to solve this problem.Objectives: By comparing the efficacy of the two surgical methods, to evaluate whether SG + OAB surgery can solve the dilemma faced by OAGB that the excluded stomach cannot be screened.Methods: A retrospective study to compare the patients who underwent OAGB and SG + OAB was conducted. The main outcome measures were (1) operation risk, (2) weight loss, and (3) diabetes remission at 6 months.Results: This study was conducted in the bariatric/metabolic surgical center. From November 2021 to February 2022, a total of 30 patients with obesity who received SG + OAB surgery were recruited. Another matched 60 patients undergoing OAGB were recruited as control group. There was no difference in preoperative age (32.15 +/- 9.02 vs. 34.47 +/- 7.22; p = .224), female ratio (83% vs. 85%; p = .837), and BMI (36.18 +/- 5.30 vs. 34.68 +/- 5.58; p = .217) between the two groups. OAGB had a shorter mean operation time (121.67 +/- 20.41 vs. 143.50 +/- 25.07 min; p < .001) and a lower intraoperative blood loss (21.92 +/- 12.35 vs. 32.43 +/- 22.01 mL; p = .005), but a longer postoperative flatus passage (2.13 +/- 0.43 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.43 days; p = .007) compared with the SG + OAB group. Two patients (6.7%) developed major surgical complication in SG + OAB group but no major complication developed in OAGB group. At 6 months after surgery, SG + OAB had a higher %total weight loss than OAGB (31.05 +/- 3.12 vs. 28.14 +/- 5.43%; p = .015), but diabetes remission rate was similarly high in both groups.Conclusions: SG + OAB operation had a non-inferior or even better weight loss than OAGB, with a similar glycemic control efficacy. However, the high complication rate of SG + OAB is the major drawback that needs attention.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and Safety of Sleeve Gastrectomy or One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Conversion Following Adjustable Gastric Banding
    Nazari, Mojgan
    Jameson, Carolyn
    Ryan, Brendan
    Brancatisano, Anthony
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (02) : 426 - 433
  • [22] Robotic Reversal of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass into Sleeve Gastrectomy for Severe Malnutrition: Interest of the Manual Gastro-Gastric Anastomosis?
    Bruzzi, Matthieu
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 (09) : 2976 - 2978
  • [23] Outcomes in Super Obese Patients Undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Vitish Singla
    Sandeep Aggarwal
    Bhanu Singh
    Gattu Tharun
    Varidh Katiyar
    Amit Bhambri
    Obesity Surgery, 2019, 29 : 1242 - 1247
  • [24] Outcomes in Super Obese Patients Undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass or Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Singla, Vitish
    Aggarwal, Sandeep
    Singh, Bhanu
    Tharun, Gattu
    Katiyar, Varidh
    Bhambri, Amit
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 (04) : 1242 - 1247
  • [25] Efficacy and Safety of Sleeve Gastrectomy or One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Conversion Following Adjustable Gastric Banding
    Mojgan Nazari
    Carolyn Jameson
    Brendan Ryan
    Anthony Brancatisano
    Obesity Surgery, 2023, 33 : 426 - 433
  • [26] ReSleeve or revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass for failed primary sleeve gastrectomy with dilated gastric tube: a retrospective study
    Gerges, Wadie Boshra
    Omar, Ahmed S. M.
    Shoka, Ahmed Ain
    Hamed, Mohammed Abdalmegeed
    Abdelrahim, Hossam S.
    Makram, Fady
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (02): : 787 - 798
  • [27] Robotic Reversal of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass into Sleeve Gastrectomy for Severe Malnutrition: Interest of the Manual Gastro-Gastric Anastomosis?
    Matthieu Bruzzi
    Obesity Surgery, 2019, 29 : 2976 - 2978
  • [28] Outcome of Sleeve Gastrectomy Converted to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass
    Felsenreich, D. M.
    Steinlechner, K.
    Langer, F. B.
    Vock, N.
    Eichelter, J.
    Bichler, C.
    Jedamzik, J.
    Mairinger, M.
    Kristo, I
    Prager, G.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (03) : 643 - 651
  • [29] One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Magouliotis, Dimitrios E.
    Tasiopoulou, Vasiliki S.
    Svokos, Alexis A.
    Svokos, Konstantina A.
    Sioka, Eleni
    Zacharoulis, Dimitrios
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (09) : 2479 - 2487
  • [30] Outcome of Sleeve Gastrectomy Converted to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass
    D. M. Felsenreich
    K. Steinlechner
    F. B. Langer
    N. Vock
    J. Eichelter
    C. Bichler
    J. Jedamzik
    M. Mairinger
    I. Kristo
    G. Prager
    Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32 : 643 - 651