Sleeve gastrectomy with one anastomosis bipartition versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: A pilot study

被引:1
|
作者
Qin, Xiaoguang [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Zhongqi [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lee, Wei-Jei [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Min [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Shu-Chun [3 ]
Chen, Jung-Chien [3 ]
Wu, Guoqiang [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Wei, Tiantian [1 ]
Huang, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated BenQ Hosp, Bariatr Med Ctr, Suzhou BenQ Med Ctr,Dept Metab, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] China Med Univ, Hsinchu Hosp, Med Weight Loss Ctr, Dept Gen Surg, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, 899 Ping Hai Rd, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
metabolic surgery; one-anastomosis gastric bypass; SG plus one anastomosis bipartition; OBESE-PATIENTS; EXPERIENCE; PLICATION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1111/ases.13258
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a new recognized metabolic surgery, but the problem that we cannot screen the excluded stomach is a troubling issue in China. The emergence of sleeve gastrectomy plus one anastomosis bipartition (SG + OAB) makes us see a hope to solve this problem.Objectives: By comparing the efficacy of the two surgical methods, to evaluate whether SG + OAB surgery can solve the dilemma faced by OAGB that the excluded stomach cannot be screened.Methods: A retrospective study to compare the patients who underwent OAGB and SG + OAB was conducted. The main outcome measures were (1) operation risk, (2) weight loss, and (3) diabetes remission at 6 months.Results: This study was conducted in the bariatric/metabolic surgical center. From November 2021 to February 2022, a total of 30 patients with obesity who received SG + OAB surgery were recruited. Another matched 60 patients undergoing OAGB were recruited as control group. There was no difference in preoperative age (32.15 +/- 9.02 vs. 34.47 +/- 7.22; p = .224), female ratio (83% vs. 85%; p = .837), and BMI (36.18 +/- 5.30 vs. 34.68 +/- 5.58; p = .217) between the two groups. OAGB had a shorter mean operation time (121.67 +/- 20.41 vs. 143.50 +/- 25.07 min; p < .001) and a lower intraoperative blood loss (21.92 +/- 12.35 vs. 32.43 +/- 22.01 mL; p = .005), but a longer postoperative flatus passage (2.13 +/- 0.43 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.43 days; p = .007) compared with the SG + OAB group. Two patients (6.7%) developed major surgical complication in SG + OAB group but no major complication developed in OAGB group. At 6 months after surgery, SG + OAB had a higher %total weight loss than OAGB (31.05 +/- 3.12 vs. 28.14 +/- 5.43%; p = .015), but diabetes remission rate was similarly high in both groups.Conclusions: SG + OAB operation had a non-inferior or even better weight loss than OAGB, with a similar glycemic control efficacy. However, the high complication rate of SG + OAB is the major drawback that needs attention.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Laparoscopic Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in a Hostile Abdomen
    Kapoulas, Spyridon
    Sahloul, Mohamed
    Singhal, Rishi
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (06) : 2845 - 2846
  • [12] Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Weight Loss Failure
    Tigran Poghosyan
    Ali Alameh
    Matthieu Bruzzi
    Adrien Faul
    Claire Rives-Lange
    Franck Zinzindohoue
    Richard Douard
    Jean-Marc Chevallier
    Obesity Surgery, 2019, 29 : 2436 - 2441
  • [13] Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Weight Loss Failure
    Poghosyan, Tigran
    Alameh, Ali
    Bruzzi, Matthieu
    Faul, Adrien
    Rives-Lange, Claire
    Zinzindohoue, Franck
    Douard, Richard
    Chevallier, Jean-Marc
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 (08) : 2436 - 2441
  • [14] Laparoscopic Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in a Hostile Abdomen
    Spyridon Kapoulas
    Mohamed Sahloul
    Rishi Singhal
    Obesity Surgery, 2021, 31 : 2845 - 2846
  • [15] Nutritional Outcomes One Year after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Compared to Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Shirazi, Naama
    Beglaibter, Nahum
    Grinbaum, Ronit
    Abu Ahmad, Wiessam
    Aronis, Anna
    NUTRIENTS, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [16] Comparison of the ABCD Score's Accuracy in Predicting Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus One Year After Sleeve Gastrectomy, One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, and Sleeve Gastrectomy with Transit Bipartition
    Kirkil, Cuneyt
    Aydin, Ilayda
    Yur, Mesut
    Ag, Onur
    Bozcan, Muhammed Yusuf
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (01) : 133 - 140
  • [17] A Long-Term Comparative Study Between One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Andreas Plamper
    Philipp Lingohr
    Jennifer Nadal
    Jonel Trebicka
    Maximilian J. Brol
    Anna Woestemeier
    Sophia M.-T. Schmitz
    Patrick H. Alizai
    Ulf P. Neumann
    Tom F. Ulmer
    Karl P. Rheinwalt
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2023, 27 : 47 - 55
  • [18] Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with Braun Anastomosis: What's Better?
    Olmi, Stefano
    Oldani, Alberto
    Cesana, Giovanni
    Ciccarese, Francesca
    Uccelli, Matteo
    De Carli, Stefano Maria
    Villa, Roberta
    David, Giulia
    Giorgi, Riccardo
    Zanoni, Adelinda Angela Giulia
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (11): : 1469 - 1474
  • [19] Clinical outcomes after one anastomosis gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obese patients
    Schmitz, Sophia M-T
    Alizai, Patrick H.
    Kroh, Andreas
    Schipper, Sandra
    Brozat, Jonathan F.
    Plamper, Andreas
    Neumann, Ulf P.
    Rheinwalt, Karl
    Ulmer, Tom F.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (06): : 4401 - 4407
  • [20] Sleeve Gastrectomy, One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), and Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass in Treatment of Morbid Obesity: a Retrospective Cohort Study
    Tarek Mahdy
    Waleed Gado
    Abdulwahid Alwahidi
    Carl Schou
    Sameh Hany Emile
    Obesity Surgery, 2021, 31 : 1579 - 1589