Further validation of a new ADHD screening questionnaire measuring parents' explanations (time processing, cognition, and motivation) of inattention symptoms in their school-aged children

被引:0
作者
Keulers, Esther H. H. [1 ]
Resch, Christine [1 ,2 ]
Jonkman, Lisa. M. [3 ]
Hurks, Petra P. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Neuropsychol & Psychopharmacol, POB 616, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Kempenhaeghe, Dept Neurol Learning Disabil, Heeze, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Cognit Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Construct validity; inattention; parent report; neuropsychological assessment; neuropsychological heterogeneity; VERBAL FLUENCY OUTPUT; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; SEMANTIC FLUENCY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; QUALITATIVE-ANALYSIS; INHIBITORY CONTROL; NORMATIVE DATA; LANGUAGE; TASK; PRESCHOOLERS;
D O I
10.1080/09297049.2023.2226351
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The triple pathway model suggests that different neuropsychological factors underlie symptoms of inattention (i.e., time, cognition and/or motivation problems). However, screening instruments asking individuals to judge the link between these neuropsychological factors and inattention are lacking. The recently developed screening questionnaire, PASSC, aims to examine these factors possibly causing inattention by asking parents to indicate to what extent their child experiences inattention symptoms and to what extent different neuropsychological factors explain this inattention. The present study extends prior validation research of the PASSC by examining associations between PASSC inattention explained by time, cognition, and/or motivation and children's performance on tests measuring these same three constructs. Results indicated positive correlations between PASSC inattention explained by time and less accurate performance on a time discrimination test, and between PASSC inattention explained by cognition and more working memory errors as well as higher attention switching costs. Furthermore, children whose parents indicated that their inattention was best explained by cognition showed higher switching costs than children whose inattention was best explained by motivation. This support for construct validity of the PASSC is limited to two PASSC explanations (i.e., time, cognition) and a subset of tests (i.e., time discrimination, attention switching, memory span). Future research should focus on integrating PASSC and performance test results to differentiate between children with attention problems but different underlying neuropsychological problems. Concluding, the PASSC can be a promising screening tool to identify inattention in children and the underlying explanation indicated by parents.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 550
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Psychological mechanisms in hyperactivity: I response inhibition deficit, working memory impairment, delay aversion, or something else?
    Kuntsi, J
    Oosterlaan, J
    Stevenson, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (02) : 199 - 210
  • [22] Are there distinct cognitive and motivational sub-groups of children with ADHD?
    Lambek, Rikke
    Sonuga-Barke, Edmund
    Tannock, Rosemary
    Sorensen, Anne Virring
    Damm, Dorte
    Thomsen, Per Hove
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (10) : 1722 - 1730
  • [23] Can we use neuroimaging data to differentiate between subgroups of children with ADHD symptoms: A proof of concept study using latent class analysis of brain activity
    Lecei, Aleksandra
    van Hulst, Branko M.
    de Zeeuw, Patrick
    van der Pluijm, Marieke
    Rijks, Yvonne
    Durston, Sarah
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2019, 21
  • [24] Developmental Changes in Executive Functioning
    Lee, Kerry
    Bull, Rebecca
    Ho, Ringo M. H.
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 84 (06) : 1933 - 1953
  • [25] A short note on the reliability of perceptual timing tasks as commonly used in research on developmental disorders
    Marx, Ivo
    Rubia, Katya
    Reis, Olaf
    Noreika, Valdas
    [J]. EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 30 (01) : 169 - 172
  • [26] Toward a Revised Nosology for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Heterogeneity
    Nigg, Joel T.
    Karalunas, Sarah L.
    Feczko, Eric
    Fair, Damien A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY-COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING, 2020, 5 (08) : 726 - 737
  • [27] Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and adverse health outcomes
    Nigg, Joel T.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 33 (02) : 215 - 228
  • [28] Timing deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): Evidence from neurocognitive and neuroimaging studies
    Noreika, Valdas
    Falter, Christine M.
    Rubia, Katya
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2013, 51 (02) : 235 - 266
  • [29] Performance of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on a test battery of impulsiveness
    Rubia, Katya
    Smith, Anna
    Taylor, Eric
    [J]. CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 13 (03) : 276 - 304
  • [30] ADHD in children and young people: prevalence, care pathways, and service provision
    Sayal, Kapil
    Prasad, Vibhore
    Daley, David
    Ford, Tamsin
    Coghill, David
    [J]. LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 5 (02): : 175 - 186