Insights on the Spatial Area Influencing Seismic Site Response from 2D and 1D Ground Response Analyses at Treasure Island

被引:0
|
作者
Hallal, Mohamad M. [1 ]
Cox, Brady R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT USA
关键词
H/V GEOSTATISTICAL APPROACH; BUILDING PSEUDO-3D; ACCOUNT; MODELS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
When modeling seismic site effects, many studies have focused on the importance of vertically characterizing the shear wave velocity (Vs) profile. However, the importance of laterally characterizing the Vs variability has generally been either overlooked or oversimplified. As such, little is known about the spatial area that influences seismic site effects, and the state-of-the-practice continues to quantify these effects by combining results from multiple onedimensional (1D) analyses, such as Vs randomization. In this study, we investigate the spatial area influencing site response at the Treasure Island Downhole Array (TIDA) by (1) performing numerical two-dimensional (2D) ground response analyses (GRAs) and (2) combining multiple 1D GRAs using all 1D Vs profiles sampled from the 2D models. We use a site-specific, largescale, Vs model that has been developed to a depth of 150 m over the entirety of Treasure Island. By comparing 2D and combined 1D GRA predictions from different lateral extents to recorded earthquake ground motions at TIDA, we systematically highlight the large spatial area that influences site response, which extends to distances as much as 1 km from the TIDA sensors.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 59
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparative study on time domain 1D/2D seismic ground response analysis of Norcia basin during the M6.5 2016 October 30 earthquake
    Plata, R. Rodriguez
    Smerzini, C.
    Ozcebe, A. G.
    Lai, C. G.
    Zuccolo, E.
    Bozzoni, F.
    EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 4736 - 4743
  • [42] 1D versus 2D site effects from numerical analyses on a cross section at Barberino di Mugello (Tuscany, Italy)
    Madiai, Claudia
    Facciorusso, Johann
    Gargini, Elisa
    Baglione, Massimo
    VI ITALIAN CONFERENCE OF RESEARCHERS IN GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, CNRIG2016 - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH: FROM MICROSCALE TO REGIONAL SCALE, 2016, 158 : 499 - 504
  • [43] Correction to: The possible use of equivalent homogeneous subsoil models for 1D seismic response analyses in seismic microzonation studies
    Stefania Fabozzi
    Dario Albarello
    Alessandro Pagliaroli
    Massimiliano Moscatelli
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 20 : 2283 - 2283
  • [44] Effect of surface wave inversion non-uniqueness on 1D seismic ground response analysis
    Roy, Narayan
    SankarJakka, Ravi
    Wason, H. R.
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 68 (02) : 1141 - 1153
  • [45] SPATIAL STRUCTURE BY 1D AND 2D NUCLEAR-RELAXATION METHODS
    NICCOLAI, N
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS, 1989, 7 (02): : 95 - 95
  • [46] Simplified Model for Small-Strain Nonlinearity and Strength in 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis
    Groholski, David R.
    Hashash, Youssef M. A.
    Kim, Byungmin
    Musgrove, Michael
    Harmon, Joseph
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 142 (09)
  • [47] Combining observed linear basin amplification factors with 1D nonlinear site-response analyses to predict site response for strong ground motions: Application to Wellington, New Zealand
    de la Torre, Christopher A.
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Kuncar, Felipe
    Lee, Robin L.
    Wotherspoon, Liam M.
    Kaiser, Anna E.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (01) : 143 - 173
  • [48] Optical response to stress in pyrene labelled polydimethylsiloxane elastomers: Monitoring strain in 1D and 2D
    Roberts, David R. T.
    Patel, Mogon
    Murphy, Julian J.
    Holder, Simon J.
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2012, 162 (01) : 43 - 56
  • [49] A simple constitutive model for taking into account soil nonlinearity and strength in 1D site response analyses
    Conti, R.
    Licata, V
    Angelini, M.
    EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 1861 - 1869
  • [50] A frequency domain approach to evaluate 2D seismic site response: application to the real case
    Navid Soltani
    Mohammad Hossein Bagheripour
    Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 2023, 58 : 197 - 216