Analysis of the outcomes of three different cross-linking protocols for treatment of paediatric keratoconus: A multicentre randomized controlled trial

被引:5
|
作者
Iqbal, Mohammed [1 ,4 ]
Gad, Ahmed [1 ]
Kotb, Ahmed [2 ]
Abdelhalim, Mahmoud [3 ]
机构
[1] Sohag Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Sohag, Egypt
[2] Zagazig Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Zagazig, Egypt
[3] Aswan Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Aswan, Egypt
[4] Sohag Univ, Fac Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Sohag 82425, Egypt
关键词
accelerated cross-linking; cross-linking; keratoconus progression; paediatric keratoconus; standard cross-linking; transepithelial cross-linking; vernal keratoconjunctivitis; PROGRESSIVE KERATOCONUS; FOLLOW-UP; RIBOFLAVIN; EFFICACY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/aos.15686
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyse long-term outcomes of standard cross-linking (SCXL), accelerated cross-linking (ACXL) and transepithelial cross-linking (TCXL) in the treatment of progressive paediatric keratoconus regarding stability, safety and efficacy.Methods: This prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial included 97 eyes of 97 paediatric patients with stages I-III ABCD keratoconus grading system, who were randomized into three groups; SCXL group (control group, n = 32; 3 mW/cm(2) x 30 min/5.4 J/cm(2)), ACXL (n = 33; 18 mW/cm(2) x 5 min/5.4 J/cm(2)) and TCXL (n = 32; 18 mW/cm(2) x 5 min/5.4 J/cm(2)). Subjective refraction, uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, keratometry and pachymetry measurements using corneal topography were recorded preoperatively and 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively.Results: SCXL group exhibited significant successive improvements in the mean visual, refractive and keratometric parameters throughout the entire postoperative 3 years while ACXL group exhibited significant improvements in visual and keratometric parameters in the first postoperative year that remained stable in second and third postoperative years. TCXL group exhibited significant progressive deterioration in all mean parameters compared to SCXL and ACXL (p < 0.0001). Both SCXL and ACXL revealed final 100% success rate with good stability while TCXL revealed final 22% failure rate with keratoconus progression (p < 0.0001).Conclusion: SCXL and ACXL were comparable in halting keratoconus progression and achieved good stability and safety; however, SCXL was more efficient than ACXL as it yielded greater significant postoperative mean visual, refractive and keratometric improvements achieving smoother corneal remodelling. Both SCXL and ACXL were much superior to TCXL. SCXL is the best CXL treatment option for paediatric keratoconus while ACXL is a good and effective alternative.
引用
收藏
页码:e105 / e116
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of Two Different Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking Procedure Outcomes in Patients with Keratoconus
    Ozulken, Kemal
    Aydemir, Gozde Aksoy
    Aydemir, Emre
    Kiziltoprak, Hasan
    Yuksel, Erdem
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 37 (03) : 131 - 137
  • [32] Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yeh, Cyuan Yi
    Chen, Kuan Chieh
    Chen, Yen Ju
    Cheng, Sheng Fu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, : 785 - 798
  • [33] Transepithelial High-Intensity Cross-Linking for the Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus: 2-year Outcomes
    Kir, Muhammet Bahattin
    Turkyilmaz, Kemal
    Oner, Veysi
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (01) : 28 - 31
  • [34] Prediction model for treatment outcomes 3 years after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus
    Li, Yuping
    Qiao, Chen
    Wang, Haoyu
    Liu, Yu
    Qi, Mengying
    Ke, Lan
    Zhou, Yu
    Shen, Dan
    Zeng, Qingyan
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [35] Corneal haze secondary to corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus patients: Treatment and outcomes
    Sayegh, Kevin H.
    Sammouh, Fady K.
    Ayash, Jad G.
    El Chakik, Ghina F.
    Haddam, Majd S.
    Warrak, Elias L.
    MIDDLE EAST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 186 - 189
  • [36] Clinical outcomes at one year following keratoconus treatment with accelerated transepithelial cross-linking
    Alberto Artola
    David P.Pi?ero
    Pedro Ruiz-Fortes
    Roberto Soto-Negro
    Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017, 10 (04) : 652 - 655
  • [37] A novel Q-value-based nomogram for single intracorneal ring segment implantation versus standard manufacturer's nomogram combined with accelerated cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus: a randomized controlled trial
    Iqbal, Mohammed
    Elmassry, Ahmed
    Mounir, Amr
    Ibrahim, Ola
    Soliman, Ashraf
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2021, 99 (04) : E501 - E511
  • [38] Corneal Cross-Linking in Keratoconus Using the Standard and Rapid Treatment Protocol: Differences in Demarcation Line and 12-Month Outcomes
    Brittingham, Sara
    Tappeiner, Christoph
    Frueh, Beatrice E.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (12) : 8371 - 8376
  • [39] Three-years outcomes of simultaneous photorefractive surgery and customized corneal cross-linking for keratoconus
    Alkharashi, Majed S. S.
    Al-Essa, Rakan S. S.
    Abusayf, Mohammed M. M.
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 43 (08) : 2963 - 2969
  • [40] Comparison of ocular discomfort after three different epithelial debridement techniques for corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus treatment
    Alkayid, Hosamadden
    Asena, Leyla
    Yuce, Aslihan
    Colak, Meric Yavuz
    Altinors, Dilek Dursun
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 13