Influence of landscape and connectivity on anuran conservation: population viability analyses to designate protected areas

被引:4
|
作者
Andersen, D. [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Borzee, A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ, Dept Life Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Ewha Womans Univ, Div EcoSci, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Interdisciplinary Program EcoCreat, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Biol & Environm, Lab Anim Behav & Conservat, 159 Longpan Rd, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
endangered species; Dryophytes; population viability analysis; landscape connectivity; ecological modeling; treefrog; Hylidae; conservation management; EUROPEAN TREE FROG; HYLA-ARBOREA; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; HABITAT; AMPHIBIANS; OCCUPANCY; DISTRIBUTIONS; MODELS; TERRESTRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/acv.12829
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Threatened species with restricted ranges are at risk from habitat fragmentation and loss, which amplifies genetic bottleneck and impacts of small changes to their environments. Ecological models including population viability analyses (PVAs) can predict the trajectory of populations in a way that is not invasive or detrimental to the study species. They can therefore be a vital tool in modeling populations for conservation purposes. Although habitat suitability models have been used in studies to suggest areas for protected area designation, PVAs are generally not used in this regard. Dryophytes suweonensis and Dryophytes flaviventris are two threatened treefrog species endemic to the Korean Peninsula. The two species face threats of habitat loss and degradation and predation by invasive species among others. We used an integrated modeling approach combining ecological niche, connectivity, and PVAs in Vortex to determine the likelihood of extinction of each species under baseline and protected area designation scenarios. Designation scenarios were simulated in Vortex through halting future reduction in carrying capacity (halting future degradation to sites through protected area status), reducing effects of catastrophes (mitigating the effects of drought), and reducing mortality rates (controlling invasive predator populations and ex situ raising of tadpoles to maturity). We classified the combination of these management efforts as "active management" as opposed to "no management," which is currently being practiced. We additionally used a stepwise approach to determine designation priority of individual patches. Under current conditions (no management), the resulting effective metapopulations after 100 years were 167 +/- 325 individuals with an 86.5% extinction probability for D. suweonensis and 165 +/- 200 individuals with a 90.3% extinction probability for D. flaviventris. Under active management of all sites (93 sites covering 426.9 km(2)), the extinction probability was 0% for both species with significantly increased metapopulation sizes, 15 910 +/- 2855 for D. suweonensis, and 4400 +/- 874 for D. flaviventris. Determining designation priority can inform the regulatory bodies on which habitat to designate and whether active or passive management should be applied. Without intervention, these species will be likely to face imminent extinction. In addition to being useful for government-imposed conservation management, our study can be followed by future studies as a methodology for prioritizing sites for protected area designation.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 397
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Estimation of metademographic rates and landscape connectivity for a conservation-reliant anuran
    Duarte, Adam
    Peterson, James T.
    Pearl, Christopher A.
    Rowe, Jennifer C.
    McCreary, Brome
    Galvan, Stephanie K.
    Adams, Michael J.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2020, 35 (06) : 1459 - 1479
  • [2] Forecasting the influence of conservation strategies on landscape connectivity
    Mozelewski, Tina G.
    Robbins, Zachary J.
    Scheller, Robert M.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2022, 36 (05)
  • [3] Estimation of metademographic rates and landscape connectivity for a conservation-reliant anuran
    Adam Duarte
    James T. Peterson
    Christopher A. Pearl
    Jennifer C. Rowe
    Brome McCreary
    Stephanie K. Galvan
    Michael J. Adams
    Landscape Ecology, 2020, 35 : 1459 - 1479
  • [4] A multi-species approach for protected areas ecological network construction based on landscape connectivity
    Liang, Guofu
    Niu, Hanbo
    Li, Yan
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2023, 46
  • [5] Connectivity conservation a the crossroads: protected areas versus payments for ecosystem services in conserving connectivity for Colombian carnivores
    Zarrate Charry, Diego A.
    Gonzalez-Maya, Jose F.
    Arias-Alzate, Andres
    Sebastian Jimenez-Alvarado, J.
    Reyes Arias, Jessica Dayanh
    Armenteras, Dolors
    Betts, Matthew G.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [6] Extending networks of protected areas to optimize connectivity and population growth rate
    Andrello, Marco
    Jacobi, Martin Nilsson
    Manel, Stephanie
    Thuiller, Wilfried
    Mouillot, David
    ECOGRAPHY, 2015, 38 (03) : 273 - 282
  • [7] How can forest fragments support protected areas connectivity in an urban landscape in Brazil?
    Ribeiro, Marina Pannunzio
    de Mello, Kaline
    Valente, Roberta Averna
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2022, 74
  • [8] Marine spatial planning for connectivity and conservation through ecological corridors between marine protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures
    Podda, Cinzia
    Porporato, Erika M. D.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [9] Potential Distribution and Connectivity for Two Plethodontid Salamanders: Conservation Areas and Landscape Corridors for Two Endemic Species of Mexico and Guatemala
    Bolom-Huet, Rene
    Pacheco, Xareni P.
    Munoz-Alonso, Antonio
    Sunny, Armando
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 70 (06) : 965 - 977
  • [10] Conservation Significance of America's Newest System of Protected Areas: National Landscape Conservation System
    Darst, Catherine R.
    Huffman, Katelyn A.
    Jarvis, Jeff
    NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2009, 29 (03) : 224 - 254