Integrating spatiotemporal hydrological connectivity into conservation planning to protect temporary rivers

被引:1
作者
Fernandez-Calero, Jose Maria [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Cunillera-Montcusi, David [1 ,3 ]
Hermoso, Virgilio [4 ]
Quevedo-Ortiz, Guillermo [1 ,2 ]
Fortuno, Pau [1 ,2 ]
Acosta, Raul [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Goma, Joan [1 ]
Cid, Nuria [1 ,7 ]
Vinyoles, Dolors [1 ,2 ]
Ruhi, Albert [8 ]
Canedo-Arguelles, Miguel [6 ]
Bonada, Nuria [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Biol Evolut Ecol & Ciencies Ambientals, Freshwater Ecol Hydrol & Management Grp FEHM, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona UB, Inst Recerca Biodiversitat IRBio, Barcelona, Spain
[3] HUN REN Ctr Ecol Res, Inst Aquat Ecol, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Seville, Dept Biol Vegetal & Ecol, Seville, Spain
[5] Univ Barcelona UB, Inst Recerca Aigua IdRA, Barcelona, Spain
[6] CSIC, Inst Diagnost Ambiental & Estudis Aigua IDAEA, Freshwater Ecol Hydrol & Management FEHM, Barcelona, Spain
[7] IRTA, Marine & Continental Waters Programme, La Rapita, Catalonia, Spain
[8] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA USA
[9] Univ Barcelona UB, Dept Biol Evolut Ecol & Ciencies Ambientals, Freshwater Ecol Hydrol & Management FEHM, Diagonal 643, Barcelona 08028, Spain
关键词
aquatic macroinvertebrates; conservation planning; diatoms; habitat connectivity; habitat heterogeneity; local contribution to beta diversity; Marxan; species contribution to beta diversity; temporary rivers; FRESH-WATER BIODIVERSITY; BETA-DIVERSITY; DISPERSAL; FLOW; STREAM; COMMUNITIES; CHALLENGES; COMPONENTS; RICHNESS; INSECTA;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.4139
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Temporary rivers (TRs) have been largely overlooked in conservation assessments. Because TRs are such dynamic ecosystems, spatial and temporal aspects of their hydrology and ecology need to be taken into account when designing conservation plans. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of recommendations that could be useful for managers to do this, using seasonal diatom and macroinvertebrate data from north-eastern Spain as a case study. Beta diversity was partitioned into local and species contributions to beta diversity (LCBD and SCBD). Additionally, priority conservation sites covering the spatial distribution of all species were identified using Marxan and the selection frequency (MSF) of the sites served as a measure of the relative irreplaceability of each site. Using both approaches (beta diversity and Marxan), the effects of changing spatiotemporal connectivity and habitat heterogeneity on the selection and prioritization of sites to be conserved were assessed. It was found that LCBD and MSF ranged widely both in space and time. However, LCBD and MSF were weakly related. Marxan adequately represented all taxa by selecting a few sites, while LCBD selected communities with higher differentiation but not necessarily those with rare species. In addition, SCBDs assigned low values to rare taxa, thus care must be taken when using this index for conservation planning. Spatiotemporal connectivity and local habitat heterogeneity played a critical role at the regional and local scales, driving site prioritization. Overall, we recommend: 1) monitoring multiple hydrological phases to encompass the different community types and capturing total diversity; 2) using Marxan and LCBD in combination, to benefit from their complementary insights; and 3) integrating spatiotemporal isolation and habitat heterogeneity into conservation plans, since they are the main drivers of community variation over space and time in TRs.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Operationalizing ecological connectivity in spatial conservation planning with Marxan Connect
    Daigle, Remi M.
    Metaxas, Anna
    Balbar, Arieanna C.
    McGowan, Jennifer
    Treml, Eric A.
    Kuempel, Caitlin D.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Beger, Maria
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 11 (04): : 570 - 579
  • [12] Modeling the impact of future development and public conservation orientation on landscape connectivity for conservation planning
    Lechner, Alex Mark
    Brown, Greg
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2015, 30 (04) : 699 - 713
  • [13] Integrating social science into conservation planning
    Niemiec, Rebecca M.
    Gruby, Rebecca
    Quartuch, Michael
    Cavaliere, Christina T.
    Teel, Tara L.
    Crooks, Kevin
    Salerno, Jonathan
    Solomon, Jennifer N.
    Jones, Kelly W.
    Gavin, Michael
    Lavoie, Anna
    Stronza, Amanda
    Meth, Leah
    Enrici, Ash
    Lanter, Katie
    Browne, Christine
    Proctor, Jonathan
    Manfredo, Michael
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 262
  • [14] Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in urban landscapes
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Simondson, David
    White, Matt
    Moilanen, Atte
    Bekessy, Sarah Adine
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2009, 91 (04) : 183 - 194
  • [15] Improving conservation planning for semi-natural grasslands: Integrating connectivity into agri-environment schemes
    Arponen, Anni
    Heikkinen, Risto K.
    Paloniemi, Riikka
    Poyry, Juha
    Simila, Jukka
    Kuussaari, Mikko
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 160 : 234 - 241
  • [16] Integrated planning for land-sea ecosystem connectivity to protect coral reefs
    Makino, Azusa
    Beger, Maria
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Jupiter, Stacy D.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 165 : 35 - 42
  • [17] Characterising landscape connectivity for conservation planning using a dispersal guild approach
    Alex Mark Lechner
    Daniel Sprod
    Oberon Carter
    Edward C. Lefroy
    Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32 : 99 - 113
  • [18] Characterising landscape connectivity for conservation planning using a dispersal guild approach
    Lechner, Alex Mark
    Sprod, Daniel
    Carter, Oberon
    Lefroy, Edward C.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2017, 32 (01) : 99 - 113
  • [19] A graph-theory frarmework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning
    Minor, Emily S.
    Urban, Dean L.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (02) : 297 - 307
  • [20] An eco-hydrological assessment method for temporary rivers. The Celone and Salsola rivers case study (SE, Italy)
    De Girolamo, Anna Maria
    Gallart, Francesc
    Pappagallo, Giuseppe
    Santese, Gerardina
    Lo Porto, Antonio
    ANNALES DE LIMNOLOGIE-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIMNOLOGY, 2015, 51 (01) : 1 - 10