A Cross-sectional Study of Regret in Cancer Patients After Sharing Test Results for Pathogenic Germline Variants of Hereditary Cancers With Relatives

被引:0
作者
Fukuzaki, Naomi [1 ]
Kiyozumi, Yoshimi [2 ]
Higashigawa, Satomi [2 ]
Horiuchi, Yasue [2 ,3 ]
Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki [2 ,4 ]
Nishimura, Seiichiro [2 ,5 ]
Mori, Keita [6 ]
Notsu, Akifumi [6 ]
Suishu, Izumi [1 ]
Ohnami, Sumiko [7 ]
Kusuhara, Masatoshi [7 ]
Yamaguchi, Ken [8 ]
Doorenbos, Ardith Z. [9 ]
Takeda, Yuko [10 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Nursing, Nagaizumi, Japan
[2] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Div Genet Med Promot, Nagaizumi, Japan
[3] Tokyo Metropolitan Inst Med Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Div Endoscopy, Nagaizumi, Japan
[5] Shizuoka Canc Ctr Hosp, Div Breast Surg, Nagaizumi, Japan
[6] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Clin Res Ctr, Nagaizumi, Japan
[7] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Res Inst, Nagaizumi, Japan
[8] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Nagaizumi, Japan
[9] Univ Illinois, Coll Nursing, Dept Biobehav Nursing Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[10] Keio Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Management, 45 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Decision making; Genetic testing; Germline mutation; Hereditary; Sharing results; Whole exome sequencing; QUALITATIVE CONTENT-ANALYSIS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; DECISION REGRET; FAMILY COMMUNICATION; SECONDARY FINDINGS; MEDICAL GENETICS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; CLINICAL EXOME; DISTRESS; BRCA1/2;
D O I
10.1097/NCC.0000000000001224
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Research on whole genome/exome sequencing is increasing worldwide. However, challenges are emerging in relation to receiving germline pathogenic variant results and sharing them with relatives. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of and reasoning related to regret among patients with cancer who shared single-gene testing results and whole exome sequencing with family members. Methods This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. The Decision Regret Scale was administered, and descriptive questionnaires were used with 21 patients with cancer. Results Eight patients were classified as having no regret, 9 patients were classified as having mild regret, and 4 patients were classified as having moderate to strong regret. Reasons patients felt that sharing was the right decision included the following: to allow relatives and children to take preventive measures, the need for both parties to be aware of and ready for the hereditary transmission of cancer, and the need to be able to discuss the situation with others. On the other hand, some patients did not think it was a good decision to share the information because of the associated anxiety. Conclusions Regret over sharing test results for pathogenic germline variants of hereditary cancers with relatives tended to be low. The main reason was that patients believed that they were able to benefit others by sharing. Implications for Practice Healthcare professionals need to understand the postsharing perceptions and experiences of patients and support them throughout the sharing process.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 367
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
    Graneheim, UH
    Lundman, B
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2004, 24 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [12] Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results
    Graves, Kristi D.
    Sinicrope, Pamela S.
    Esplen, Mary Jane
    Peterson, Susan K.
    Patten, Christi A.
    Lowery, Jan
    Sinicrope, Frank A.
    Nigon, Sandra K.
    Borgen, Joyce
    Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld
    Keogh, Louise A.
    Lindor, Noralane M.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 16 (04) : 294 - 301
  • [13] ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
    Green, Robert C.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Grody, Wayne W.
    Kalia, Sarah S.
    Korf, Bruce R.
    Martin, Christa L.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Nussbaum, Robert L.
    O'Daniel, Julianne M.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Rehm, Heidi L.
    Watson, Michael S.
    Williams, Marc S.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (07) : 565 - 574
  • [14] Emotional Distress Following Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Hamilton, Jada G.
    Lobel, Marci
    Moyer, Anne
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 28 (04) : 510 - 518
  • [15] Patient satisfaction in relation to nipple reconstruction: The importance of information provision
    Harcourt, D.
    Russell, C.
    Hughes, J.
    White, P.
    Nduka, C.
    Smith, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (04) : 494 - 499
  • [16] Hart MR, 2019, GENET MED, V21, P1100, DOI 10.1038/s41436-018-0308-x
  • [17] Quantifying family dissemination and identifying barriers to communication of risk information in Australian BRCA families
    Healey, Emma
    Taylor, Natalie
    Greening, Sian
    Wakefield, Claire E.
    Warwick, Linda
    Williams, Rachel
    Tucker, Kathy
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 19 (12) : 1323 - 1331
  • [18] Decisional conflict and regret: Consequences of surrogate decision making for the chronically critically ill
    Hickman, Ronald L., Jr.
    Daly, Barbara J.
    Lee, Eunsuk
    [J]. APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2012, 25 (04) : 271 - 275
  • [19] Disclosure of secondary findings in exome sequencing of 2480 Japanese cancer patients
    Horiuchi, Yasue
    Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki
    Kiyozumi, Yoshimi
    Nishimura, Seiichiro
    Higashigawa, Satomi
    Kado, Nobuhiro
    Nagashima, Takeshi
    Mizuguchi, Maki
    Ohnami, Sumiko
    Arai, Makoto
    Urakami, Kenichi
    Kusuhara, Masatoshi
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    [J]. HUMAN GENETICS, 2021, 140 (02) : 321 - 331
  • [20] Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
    Kalia, Sarah S.
    Adelman, Kathy
    Bale, Sherri J.
    Chung, Wendy K.
    Eng, Christine
    Evans, James P.
    Herman, Gail E.
    Hufnagel, Sophia B.
    Klein, Teri E.
    Korf, Bruce R.
    McKelvey, Kent D.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    Richards, C. Sue
    Vlangos, Christopher N.
    Watson, Michael
    Martin, Christa L.
    Miller, David T.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 19 (02) : 249 - 255