A Cross-sectional Study of Regret in Cancer Patients After Sharing Test Results for Pathogenic Germline Variants of Hereditary Cancers With Relatives

被引:0
作者
Fukuzaki, Naomi [1 ]
Kiyozumi, Yoshimi [2 ]
Higashigawa, Satomi [2 ]
Horiuchi, Yasue [2 ,3 ]
Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki [2 ,4 ]
Nishimura, Seiichiro [2 ,5 ]
Mori, Keita [6 ]
Notsu, Akifumi [6 ]
Suishu, Izumi [1 ]
Ohnami, Sumiko [7 ]
Kusuhara, Masatoshi [7 ]
Yamaguchi, Ken [8 ]
Doorenbos, Ardith Z. [9 ]
Takeda, Yuko [10 ]
机构
[1] Shizuoka Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Nursing, Nagaizumi, Japan
[2] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Div Genet Med Promot, Nagaizumi, Japan
[3] Tokyo Metropolitan Inst Med Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Div Endoscopy, Nagaizumi, Japan
[5] Shizuoka Canc Ctr Hosp, Div Breast Surg, Nagaizumi, Japan
[6] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Clin Res Ctr, Nagaizumi, Japan
[7] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Res Inst, Nagaizumi, Japan
[8] Shizuoka Canc Ctr, Nagaizumi, Japan
[9] Univ Illinois, Coll Nursing, Dept Biobehav Nursing Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[10] Keio Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Management, 45 Shinanomachi,Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Decision making; Genetic testing; Germline mutation; Hereditary; Sharing results; Whole exome sequencing; QUALITATIVE CONTENT-ANALYSIS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; DECISION REGRET; FAMILY COMMUNICATION; SECONDARY FINDINGS; MEDICAL GENETICS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; CLINICAL EXOME; DISTRESS; BRCA1/2;
D O I
10.1097/NCC.0000000000001224
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Research on whole genome/exome sequencing is increasing worldwide. However, challenges are emerging in relation to receiving germline pathogenic variant results and sharing them with relatives. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of and reasoning related to regret among patients with cancer who shared single-gene testing results and whole exome sequencing with family members. Methods This was a single-center, cross-sectional study. The Decision Regret Scale was administered, and descriptive questionnaires were used with 21 patients with cancer. Results Eight patients were classified as having no regret, 9 patients were classified as having mild regret, and 4 patients were classified as having moderate to strong regret. Reasons patients felt that sharing was the right decision included the following: to allow relatives and children to take preventive measures, the need for both parties to be aware of and ready for the hereditary transmission of cancer, and the need to be able to discuss the situation with others. On the other hand, some patients did not think it was a good decision to share the information because of the associated anxiety. Conclusions Regret over sharing test results for pathogenic germline variants of hereditary cancers with relatives tended to be low. The main reason was that patients believed that they were able to benefit others by sharing. Implications for Practice Healthcare professionals need to understand the postsharing perceptions and experiences of patients and support them throughout the sharing process.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 367
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Ashida S, 2012, J COMMUN GENET, V3, P285, DOI 10.1007/s12687-012-0097-x
  • [2] Validation of a decision regret scale
    Brehaut, JC
    O'Connor, AM
    Wood, TJ
    Hack, TF
    Siminoff, L
    Gordon, E
    Feldman-Stewart, D
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) : 281 - 292
  • [3] Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
    Burke, Wylie
    Antommaria, Armand H. Matheny
    Bennett, Robin
    Botkin, Jeffrey
    Clayton, Ellen Wright
    Henderson, Gail E.
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Khoury, Muin J.
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Press, Nancy A.
    Ross, Lainie Friedman
    Rothstein, Mark A.
    Saal, Howard
    Uhlmann, Wendy R.
    Wilfond, Benjamin
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Zimmern, Ron
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (11) : 854 - 859
  • [4] Communication of BRCA Results and Family Testing in 1,103 High-Risk Women
    Cheung, Eleanor L.
    Olson, Ashley D.
    Yu, Tina M.
    Han, Pamela Z.
    Beattie, Mary S.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (09) : 2211 - 2219
  • [5] Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research
    Clayton, EW
    Ross, LF
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (01): : 37 - 37
  • [6] Communicating BRCA1/2 genetic test results within the family: A qualitative analysis
    Dancyger, Caroline
    Wiseman, Mel
    Jacobs, Chris
    Smith, Jonathan A.
    Wallace, Melissa
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2011, 26 (08) : 1018 - 1035
  • [7] The qualitative content analysis process
    Elo, Satu
    Kyngaes, Helvi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2008, 62 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [8] Psychosocial and Clinical Factors Associated with Family Communication of Cancer Genetic Test Results among Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer at a Young Age
    Elrick, Ashley
    Ashida, Sato
    Ivanovich, Jennifer
    Lyons, Sarah
    Biesecker, Barbara B.
    Goodman, Melody S.
    Kaphingst, Kimberly A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2017, 26 (01) : 173 - 181
  • [9] Erlingsson C, 2017, AFR J EMERG MED, V7, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
  • [10] Sharing genetic test results of germline pathogenic variants of hereditary cancer with relatives: A single-center cross-sectional study
    Fukuzaki, Naomi
    Kiyozumi, Yoshimi
    Higashigawa, Satomi
    Horiuchi, Yasue
    Mizuguchi, Maki
    Matsubayashi, Hiroyuki
    Nishimura, Seiichiro
    Mori, Keita
    Notsu, Akifumi
    Suishu, Izumi
    Ohnami, Sumiko
    Kusuhara, Masatoshi
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
    Takeda, Yuko
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 51 (10) : 1547 - 1553