Reshaping National Organ Allocation Policy

被引:1
|
作者
Papalexopoulos, Theodore [1 ]
Alcorn, James [2 ]
Bertsimas, Dimitris [1 ]
Goff, Rebecca [2 ]
Stewart, Darren [3 ]
Trichakis, Nikolaos [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Operat Res Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] United Network Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
[3] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
fairness; policy design; multi-objective optimization; resource allocation; fairness and efficiency tradeoff; organ allocation; LIVER ALLOCATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1287/opre.2022.0035
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The Organ Procurement & Transplantation Network (OPTN) initiated in 2018 a major overhaul of all U.S. deceased-donor organ allocation policies, aiming to gradually migrate them to a so-called continuous distribution model, with the goal of creating an allocation system that is more efficient, more equitable, and more inclusive. Development of policies within this model, however, represents a major challenge because multiple efficiency and fairness objectives need to be delicately balanced. We introduce a novel analytical framework that leverages machine learning, simulation, and optimization to illuminate policy tradeoffs and enable dynamic exploration of the efficient frontier of policy options. In collaboration with the OPTN, we applied the framework to design a new national allocation policy for lungs. Since March 9, 2023, all deceased-donor lungs in the United States have been allocated according to this policy that we helped design, projected to reduce waitlist mortality by approximately 20% compared with current policy based on simulations. We discuss how we extended our collaboration with the OPTN to the redesign of kidney, pancreas, heart, and liver allocation and how our framework can be applied to other application domains, such as school choice or public housing allocation systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1475 / 1486
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Policy Challenges for Organ Allocation in an Era of "Precision Medicine"
    Caulfield, Timothy
    Murdoch, Blake
    Sapir-Pichhadze, Ruth
    Keown, Paul
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2020, 7
  • [2] MELD-based organ allocation policy: Time for change
    Thomas, Philip G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 18 (11) : 2833 - 2833
  • [3] Unintended Consequences of the New National Kidney Allocation Policy in the United States
    Tambur, A. R.
    Haarberg, K. M. K.
    Friedewald, J. J.
    Leventhal, J. R.
    Cusick, M. F.
    Jaramillo, A.
    Abecassis, M. M.
    Kaplan, B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15 (09) : 2465 - 2469
  • [4] Perceived transparency and fairness of the organ allocation system and willingness to donate organs: A national study
    Boulware, L. E.
    Troll, M. U.
    Wang, N.-Y.
    Powe, N. R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (07) : 1778 - 1787
  • [5] Prioritized organ allocation rules under compatibility constraints
    Li, Mengling
    Riyanto, Yohanes E.
    Xu, Menghan
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2023, 141 : 403 - 427
  • [6] Perioperative mortality in liver transplantation before and after the implementation of the organ allocation policy Share 35
    Holm, Zacharias D.
    Kolodzie, Kerstin
    Galli, Alessandro M.
    Meyhoff, Christian S.
    Niemann, Claus U.
    Adelmann, Dieter
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 37 (01)
  • [7] Incentivizing Organ Donor Registrations with Organ Allocation Priority
    Stoler, Avraham
    Kessler, Judd B.
    Ashkenazi, Tamar
    Roth, Alvin E.
    Lavee, Jacob
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (04) : 500 - 510
  • [8] Organ allocation in lung transplant
    Davis, Steven Q.
    Garrity, Edward R., Jr.
    CHEST, 2007, 132 (05) : 1646 - 1651
  • [9] Continuously Balancing the Ethics of Organ Allocation
    James Alcorn
    Current Transplantation Reports, 2024, 11 : 7 - 14
  • [10] Continuously Balancing the Ethics of Organ Allocation
    Alcorn, James
    CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS, 2024, 11 (01) : 7 - 14