Mesorectal reconstruction with pedicled greater omental transplantation to relieve low anterior resection syndrome following total intersphincteric resection in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer

被引:2
作者
Liao, Jiankun [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Haiquan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zheng [3 ]
Meng, Linghou [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wentao [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jungang [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Xianwei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Div Colorectal & Anal, Canc Hosp, 71, Hedi Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Guangxi Clin Res Ctr Colorectal Canc, Div Colorectal & Anal, Canc Hosp, 71, Hedi Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Med Univ, Med Imaging Ctr, Canc Hosp, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Ultra-low rectal cancer; Total intersphincteric resection; Pedicled greater omental transplantation; Low anterior resection syndrome; Anorectal function; SPHINCTER-SAVING SURGERY; COLOANAL ANASTOMOSIS; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CM; QUALITY; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; COLOPLASTY; DISORDER; EXCISION; MARGIN;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-023-02140-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundTotal intersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate anus-preserving surgery for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer (ULRC), which can result in various degrees of anorectal dysfunction. Known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), it seriously affects the postoperative quality of life of patients. The aim of this study was to discuss the value of mesorectal reconstruction with pedicled greater omental transplantation (PGOT) to relieve LARS following total ISR in patients with ULRC, hoping to provide new ideas and strategies for the prevention and improvement of LARS.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed hospitalization data and postoperative anorectal function of 26 ULRC patients, who were met inclusion and exclusion criteria in our center from January 2015 to February 2022. And combined with the results of anorectal manometry and rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) defecography of some patients, we assessed comprehensively anorectal physiological and morphological changes of the patients after surgery, and their correlation with LARS.ResultsIn this study, 26 patients with ULRC were enrolled and divided into observation group (n = 15) and control group (n = 11) according to whether PGOT was performed. There were no significant differences in surgical results such as operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative follow-up showed that patients in both groups showed severe LARS within 3 months after surgery, but from the 3(rd) month after surgery, LARS in both groups gradually began to decrease, especially in the observation group, which showed faster recovery and better recovery, with statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). Through anorectal manometry, the mean rectal resting pressure in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P = 0.010). In addition, the postoperative thickness of the posterior rectal mesenterium in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P = 0.001), and also higher than the preoperative level (P = 0.018). Moreover, rectal MRI defecography showed that the neo-rectum had good compliance under the matting of greater omentum, and its intestinal peristalsis was coordinated.ConclusionsULRC patients, with the help of greater omentum, coordinated their neo-rectum peristalsis after total ISR and recovery of LARS was faster and better. PGOT is expected to be an effective strategy for LARS prevention and treatment of ULRC patients after surgery and is worthy of clinical promotion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] ABBES MJL, 1974, INT SURG, V59, P81
  • [2] St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision
    Adamina, Michel
    Buchs, Nicolas C.
    Penna, Marta
    Hompes, Roel
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (03): : 1091 - 1103
  • [3] Circumferential Resection Margin is Associated With Distant Metastasis After Rectal Cancer Surgery A Nation-wide Population-based Study Cohort
    Agger, Erik
    Joergren, Fredrik
    Lydrup, Marie-Louise
    Buchwald, Pamela
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 277 (02) : E346 - E352
  • [4] Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review
    Akagi, Yoshito
    Kinugasa, Tetsushi
    Shirouzu, Kazuo
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2013, 43 (08) : 838 - 847
  • [5] Prospective comparison of short- and long-term effects of pelvic floor exercise/biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence after surgery plus irradiation versus surgery alone for colorectal cancer: Clinical, functional and endoscopic/endosonographic findings
    Allgayer, H
    Dietrich, CF
    Rohde, W
    Koch, GF
    Tuschhoff, T
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 40 (10) : 1168 - 1175
  • [6] The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Greene, Frederick L.
    Edge, Stephen B.
    Compton, Carolyn C.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    Brookland, Robert K.
    Meyer, Laura
    Gress, Donna M.
    Byrd, David R.
    Winchester, David P.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [7] Rectal Cancer, Version 6.2020 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
    Benson, Al B., III
    Venook, Alan P.
    Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M.
    Arain, Mustafa A.
    Chen, Yi-Jen
    Ciombor, Kristen K.
    Cohen, Stacey
    Cooper, Harry S.
    Deming, Dustin
    Garrido-Laguna, Ignacio
    Grem, Jean L.
    Gunn, Andrew
    Hoffe, Sarah
    Hubbard, Joleen
    Hunt, Steven
    Kirilcuk, Natalie
    Krishnamurthi, Smitha
    Messersmith, Wells A.
    Meyerhardt, Jeffrey
    Miller, Eric D.
    Mulcahy, Mary F.
    Nurkin, Steven
    Overman, Michael J.
    Parikh, Aparna
    Patel, Hitendra
    Pedersen, Katrina
    Saltz, Leonard
    Schneider, Charles
    Shibata, David
    Skibber, John M.
    Sofocleous, Constantinos T.
    Stoffel, Elena M.
    Stotsky-Himelfarb, Eden
    Willett, Christopher G.
    Johnson-Chilla, Alyse
    Gurski, Lisa A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2020, 18 (07): : 807 - 815
  • [8] Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
    Benson, Al B., III
    Venook, Alan P.
    Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M.
    Cederquist, Lynette
    Chen, Yi-Jen
    Ciombor, Kristen K.
    Cohen, Stacey
    Cooper, Harry S.
    Deming, Dustin
    Engstrom, Paul F.
    Grem, Jean L.
    Grothey, Axel
    Hochster, Howard S.
    Hoffe, Sarah
    Hunt, Steven
    Kamel, Ahmed
    Kirilcuk, Natalie
    Krishnamurthi, Smitha
    Messersmith, Wells A.
    Meyerhardt, Jeffrey
    Mulcahy, Mary F.
    Murphy, James D.
    Nurkin, Steven
    Saltz, Leonard
    Sharma, Sunil
    Shibata, David
    Skibber, John M.
    Sofocleous, Constantinos T.
    Stoffel, Elena M.
    Stotsky-Himelfarb, Eden
    Willett, Christopher G.
    Wuthrick, Evan
    Gregory, Kristina M.
    Gurski, Lisa
    Freedman-Cass, Deborah A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2018, 16 (07): : 874 - 901
  • [9] Anterior resection syndrome
    Bryant, Catherine L. C.
    Lunniss, Peter J.
    Knowles, Charles H.
    Thaha, Mohamed A.
    Chan, Christopher L. H.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (09) : E403 - E408
  • [10] Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review
    Bujko, Krzysztof
    Rutkowski, Andrzej
    Chang, George J.
    Michalski, Wojciech
    Chmielik, Ewa
    Kusnierz, Jerzy
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (03) : 801 - 808