International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the US Food and Drug Administration draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials

被引:8
作者
Brady, Keri J. S. [1 ]
Peipert, John Devin [2 ]
Atkinson, Thomas M. [3 ]
Pompili, Cecilia [4 ]
Pinto, Monica [5 ]
Shaw, James W. [6 ]
Roydhouse, Jessica [7 ]
机构
[1] Sanofi, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med Social Sci, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Leeds, PCOR, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Ist Nazl Tumori IRCCS Fdn G Pascale, Rehabil Med Unit, Naples, Italy
[6] Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ USA
[7] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Clinical outcome assessment; Guidance; Oncology; Trial;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-023-03396-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In June 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and related considerations for instrument selection and trial design in registrational cancer clinical trials, building on prior communications about the use of PROs to assess efficacy and tolerability in oncology drug development. The International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Standards and Best Practices Committee led an initiative to draft a commentary about the guidance, focusing on its positive aspects and areas that would benefit from additional clarification and consideration. For comprehensiveness, the authors reviewed existing public comments on the draft guidance, and the commentary underwent a thorough review process through three ISOQOL Special Interest Groups (Psychometrics, Clinical Practice, and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement) followed by the ISOQOL Board. The goal of this commentary is to situate this new and relevant guidance document within the context of recent regulatory efforts on PROs and highlight areas in which further work may ultimately benefit the field.
引用
收藏
页码:2155 / 2163
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection [J].
Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee ;
Roydhouse, Jessica ;
Rivera, Samantha Cruz ;
Kamudoni, Paul ;
Schache, Peter ;
Wilson, Roger ;
Stephens, Richard ;
Calvert, Melanie .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
[2]   Perspectives on Virtual (Remote) Clinical Trials as the "New Normal" to Accelerate Drug Development [J].
Alemayehu, Demissie ;
Hemmings, Robert ;
Natarajan, Kannan ;
Roychoudhury, Satrajit .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 111 (02) :373-381
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Reflection Paper on the use of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: guidance for industry
[5]  
Basch E, 2018, Friends of Cancer Research
[6]   Patient-Reported Outcomes - Harnessing Patients' Voices to Improve Clinical Care [J].
Basch, Ethan .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (02) :105-108
[7]   Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Mitchell, Sandra A. ;
Clauser, Steven B. ;
Minasian, Lori M. ;
Dueck, Amylou C. ;
Mendoza, Tito R. ;
Hay, Jennifer ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Bruner, Deborah W. ;
Cleeland, Charles S. ;
Sloan, Jeff A. ;
Chilukuri, Ram ;
Baumgartner, Paul ;
Denicoff, Andrea ;
St Germain, Diane ;
O'Mara, Ann M. ;
Chen, Alice ;
Kelaghan, Joseph ;
Bennett, Antonia V. ;
Sit, Laura ;
Rogak, Lauren ;
Barz, Allison ;
Paul, Diane B. ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (09)
[8]  
Bhatnagar V, 2022, Supporting a patient-centric approach to dose optimization in oncology: the essential role of patient-reported outcomes (PROs)
[9]   Stakeholder perspectives on implementing the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) [J].
Bruner, Deborah Watkins ;
Hanisch, Laura J. ;
Reeve, Bryce B. ;
Trotti, Andy M. ;
Schrag, Deborah ;
Sit, Laura ;
Mendoza, Tito R. ;
Minasian, Lori ;
O'Mara, Ann ;
Denicoff, Andrea M. ;
Rowland, Julia H. ;
Montello, Michael ;
Geoghegan, Cindy ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Clauser, Steven B. ;
Castro, Kathleen ;
Mitchell, Sandra A. ;
Burke, Laurie ;
Trentacosti, Ann Marie ;
Basch, Ethan M. .
TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 1 (01) :110-122
[10]   Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire: Psychometric Performance and Regulatory Qualification of a Novel Patient-Reported Symptom Measure [J].
Bushnell, Donald M. ;
Atkinson, Thomas M. ;
McCarrier, Kelly P. ;
Liepa, Astra M. ;
DeBusk, Kendra P. ;
Coons, Stephen Joel .
CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2021, 95