International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the US Food and Drug Administration draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials

被引:7
作者
Brady, Keri J. S. [1 ]
Peipert, John Devin [2 ]
Atkinson, Thomas M. [3 ]
Pompili, Cecilia [4 ]
Pinto, Monica [5 ]
Shaw, James W. [6 ]
Roydhouse, Jessica [7 ]
机构
[1] Sanofi, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med Social Sci, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Leeds, PCOR, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Ist Nazl Tumori IRCCS Fdn G Pascale, Rehabil Med Unit, Naples, Italy
[6] Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ USA
[7] Univ Tasmania, Menzies Inst Med Res, Hobart, Tas, Australia
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Patient-reported outcomes; Clinical outcome assessment; Guidance; Oncology; Trial;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-023-03396-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In June 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and related considerations for instrument selection and trial design in registrational cancer clinical trials, building on prior communications about the use of PROs to assess efficacy and tolerability in oncology drug development. The International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Standards and Best Practices Committee led an initiative to draft a commentary about the guidance, focusing on its positive aspects and areas that would benefit from additional clarification and consideration. For comprehensiveness, the authors reviewed existing public comments on the draft guidance, and the commentary underwent a thorough review process through three ISOQOL Special Interest Groups (Psychometrics, Clinical Practice, and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement) followed by the ISOQOL Board. The goal of this commentary is to situate this new and relevant guidance document within the context of recent regulatory efforts on PROs and highlight areas in which further work may ultimately benefit the field.
引用
收藏
页码:2155 / 2163
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Roydhouse, Jessica
    Rivera, Samantha Cruz
    Kamudoni, Paul
    Schache, Peter
    Wilson, Roger
    Stephens, Richard
    Calvert, Melanie
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [2] Perspectives on Virtual (Remote) Clinical Trials as the "New Normal" to Accelerate Drug Development
    Alemayehu, Demissie
    Hemmings, Robert
    Natarajan, Kannan
    Roychoudhury, Satrajit
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 111 (02) : 373 - 381
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Reflection paper on the use of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2021, Core Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials Guidance for Industry
  • [5] Basch E, 2018, BROADENING DEFINITIO
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcomes - Harnessing Patients' Voices to Improve Clinical Care
    Basch, Ethan
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (02) : 105 - 108
  • [7] Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
    Basch, Ethan
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Clauser, Steven B.
    Minasian, Lori M.
    Dueck, Amylou C.
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Hay, Jennifer
    Atkinson, Thomas M.
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    Bruner, Deborah W.
    Cleeland, Charles S.
    Sloan, Jeff A.
    Chilukuri, Ram
    Baumgartner, Paul
    Denicoff, Andrea
    St Germain, Diane
    O'Mara, Ann M.
    Chen, Alice
    Kelaghan, Joseph
    Bennett, Antonia V.
    Sit, Laura
    Rogak, Lauren
    Barz, Allison
    Paul, Diane B.
    Schrag, Deborah
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (09):
  • [8] Bhatnagar V., 2022, SUPPORTING PATIENT C
  • [9] Stakeholder perspectives on implementing the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
    Bruner, Deborah Watkins
    Hanisch, Laura J.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Trotti, Andy M.
    Schrag, Deborah
    Sit, Laura
    Mendoza, Tito R.
    Minasian, Lori
    O'Mara, Ann
    Denicoff, Andrea M.
    Rowland, Julia H.
    Montello, Michael
    Geoghegan, Cindy
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    Clauser, Steven B.
    Castro, Kathleen
    Mitchell, Sandra A.
    Burke, Laurie
    Trentacosti, Ann Marie
    Basch, Ethan M.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 1 (01) : 110 - 122
  • [10] Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Symptom Assessment Questionnaire: Psychometric Performance and Regulatory Qualification of a Novel Patient-Reported Symptom Measure
    Bushnell, Donald M.
    Atkinson, Thomas M.
    McCarrier, Kelly P.
    Liepa, Astra M.
    DeBusk, Kendra P.
    Coons, Stephen Joel
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2021, 95