Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model

被引:1
作者
Lee, Yoonsub [1 ]
Lee, Jung-Tae [2 ]
Han, Hee-seung [1 ]
Oh, Seunghan [3 ]
Cho, Young -Dan [1 ]
Kim, Sungtae [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul Natl Univ Dent Hosp, Dent Res Inst, Sch Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Hosp, One Stop Specialty Ctr, Dept Periodont, Seoul 05698, South Korea
[3] Wonkwang Univ, Inst Biomat & Implant, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Biomat, Iksan, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Periodontol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Collagen; Connective tissue; Gingival recession; Periodontal biotype; VEGF; Periodontology; Biologic width; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ROOT COVERAGE; AUGMENTATION; THICKNESS; DIMENSIONS; DEGRADATION; PREDICTOR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15026
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the volumetric effect and biocompatibility of porcine tendon-derived type I collagen matrix graft (CG) in gingival biotype modification (GBM) compared with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in a beagle model. Methods: Surface analysis using scanning electron microscopy and a collagen degradation assay of CG was performed in vitro. Six adult dogs were used in in vivo experiment, and each received autologous SCTG or CG at the anterior side. Histometric and three-dimensional digital volume analyses were conducted to compare quantitative changes in CG and SCTG in GBM. Immuno-histochemical analysis was performed for the qualitative evaluation of CG compared to SCTG. Results: CG had a double-layered structure, and its degradation was slower than that of other well -reported materials. No critical problems were associated with the healing procedure. Changes in gingival thickness and volume in the CG and SCTG groups were equivalent, with no significant differences between the groups. Type I collagen and vascular endothelial growth factor expression levels were similar in both groups. Significance: CG and SCTG had equivalent potential for GBM in terms of quantity and quality. Additionally, CG could be used as a reasonable substitute for SCTG, making surgery convenient and predicting successful clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recessions With and Without Enamel Matrix Derivative: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Rasperini, Giulio
    Roccuzzo, Mario
    Francetti, Luca
    Acunzo, Raffaele
    Consonni, Dario
    Silvestri, Maurizio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2011, 31 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [12] Healing of localized gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap alone or combined with either a resorbable collagen matrix or subepithelial connective tissue graft. A preclinical study
    Sculean, Anton
    Mihatovic, Ilja
    Shirakata, Yoshinori
    Bosshardt, Dieter D.
    Schwarz, Frank
    Iglhaut, Gerhard
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 19 (04) : 903 - 909
  • [13] Collagen Matrix vs. Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vallecillo, Cristina
    Toledano-Osorio, Manuel
    Vallecillo-Rivas, Marta
    Toledano, Manuel
    Rodriguez-Archilla, Alberto
    Osorio, Raquel
    [J]. POLYMERS, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [14] Subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial
    Roman, A.
    Soanca, A.
    Kasaj, A.
    Stratul, S-I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 48 (05) : 563 - 572
  • [15] Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession
    Novaes, AB
    Grisi, DC
    Molina, GO
    Souza, SLS
    Taba, M
    Grisi, MFM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (11) : 1477 - 1484
  • [16] Comparative analysis of xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft to increase soft tissue volume around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ashurko, Igor
    Tarasenko, Svetlana
    Magdalyanova, Mary
    Bokareva, Svetlana
    Balyasin, Maxim
    Galyas, Anna
    Khamidova, Marina
    Zhornik, Mariia
    Unkovskiy, Alexey
    [J]. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [17] Tunnel technique with enamel matrix derivative in addition to subepithelial connective tissue graft compared with connective tissue graft alone for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial
    Gorski, Bartlomiej
    Gorska, Renata
    Wysokinska-Miszczuk, Joanna
    Kaczynski, Tomasz
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (12) : 4475 - 4486
  • [18] Blood flow changes using a 3D xenogeneic collagen matrix or a subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage procedures: a pilot study
    Tatarakis, Nikolaos
    Gkranias, Nikolaos
    Darbar, Ulpee
    Donos, Nikolaos
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (04) : 1697 - 1705
  • [19] Healing of localized gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap alone or combined with either a resorbable collagen matrix or subepithelial connective tissue graft. A preclinical study
    Anton Sculean
    Ilja Mihatovic
    Yoshinori Shirakata
    Dieter D. Bosshardt
    Frank Schwarz
    Gerhard Iglhaut
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2015, 19 : 903 - 909
  • [20] Treatment of Gingival Recession Defects Using Coronally Advanced Flap With a Porcine Collagen Matrix Compared to Coronally Advanced Flap With Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Cardaropoli, Daniele
    Tamagnone, Lorenzo
    Roffredo, Alessandro
    Gaveglio, Lorena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 83 (03) : 321 - 328