Gingival biotype modification with collagen matrix or autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft: Histologic and volumetric analyses in a beagle model

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Yoonsub [1 ]
Lee, Jung-Tae [2 ]
Han, Hee-seung [1 ]
Oh, Seunghan [3 ]
Cho, Young -Dan [1 ]
Kim, Sungtae [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul Natl Univ Dent Hosp, Dent Res Inst, Sch Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Hosp, One Stop Specialty Ctr, Dept Periodont, Seoul 05698, South Korea
[3] Wonkwang Univ, Inst Biomat & Implant, Sch Dent, Dept Dent Biomat, Iksan, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Periodontol, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[5] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 03080, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Collagen; Connective tissue; Gingival recession; Periodontal biotype; VEGF; Periodontology; Biologic width; CORONALLY ADVANCED FLAP; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ROOT COVERAGE; AUGMENTATION; THICKNESS; DIMENSIONS; DEGRADATION; PREDICTOR; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15026
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the volumetric effect and biocompatibility of porcine tendon-derived type I collagen matrix graft (CG) in gingival biotype modification (GBM) compared with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in a beagle model. Methods: Surface analysis using scanning electron microscopy and a collagen degradation assay of CG was performed in vitro. Six adult dogs were used in in vivo experiment, and each received autologous SCTG or CG at the anterior side. Histometric and three-dimensional digital volume analyses were conducted to compare quantitative changes in CG and SCTG in GBM. Immuno-histochemical analysis was performed for the qualitative evaluation of CG compared to SCTG. Results: CG had a double-layered structure, and its degradation was slower than that of other well -reported materials. No critical problems were associated with the healing procedure. Changes in gingival thickness and volume in the CG and SCTG groups were equivalent, with no significant differences between the groups. Type I collagen and vascular endothelial growth factor expression levels were similar in both groups. Significance: CG and SCTG had equivalent potential for GBM in terms of quantity and quality. Additionally, CG could be used as a reasonable substitute for SCTG, making surgery convenient and predicting successful clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Periodontal biotype modification using a volume-stable collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a case series
    Kim, Hyun Ju
    Chang, Hyeyoon
    Kim, Sungtae
    Seol, Yang-Jo
    Kim, Hyeong-Il
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 48 (06) : 395 - 404
  • [2] Clinical comparison of a xenogeneic collagen matrix versus subepithelial autogenous connective tissue graft for augmentation of soft tissue around implants
    De Angelis, P.
    De Angelis, S.
    Passarelli, P. C.
    Liguori, M. G.
    Pompa, G.
    Papi, P.
    Manicone, P. F.
    D'Addona, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (07) : 956 - 963
  • [3] Soft tissue volume alterations after connective tissue grafting at teeth: the subepithelial autologous connective tissue graft versus a porcine collagen matrix - a pre-clinical volumetric analysis
    Schmitt, Christian M.
    Matta, Ragai E.
    Moest, Tobias
    Humann, Julia
    Gammel, Lisa
    Neukam, Friedrich W.
    Schlegel, Karl A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 43 (07) : 609 - 617
  • [4] Enamel Matrix Derivative (Emdogain) or Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Adjacent Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Pilot Study
    Alkan, Eylem Ayhan
    Parlar, Ates
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 33 (05) : 619 - U75
  • [5] Bony Exostosis After Treatment of Gingival Recession With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft and Enamel Matrix Derivative
    Lang, Melissa S.
    Barritt, Laura C.
    CLINICAL ADVANCES IN PERIODONTICS, 2016, 6 (01): : 27 - 32
  • [6] Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    AlSarhan, Mohammed A.
    Al Jasser, Reham
    Tarish, Mohammad Abdullah
    AlHuzaimi, Anas, I
    Alzoman, Hamad
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 5 (05): : 566 - 579
  • [7] Labial piercing complications Case report of gingival recession treated with subepithelial connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivatives
    Kapferer, Ines
    Beier, Ulrike S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY & OCCLUSION MEDICINE, 2013, 6 (03) : 110 - 113
  • [8] Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix Versus Connective Tissue Graft: Case Series of Various Gingival Recession Treatments
    Chevalier, Gregoire
    Cherkaoui, Selma
    Kruk, Hanna
    Bensaid, Xavier
    Danan, Marc
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 37 (01) : 117 - 123
  • [9] Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of gingival recessions: a 5-year randomized clinical study
    Moslemi, Neda
    Jazi, Mahvash Mousavi
    Haghighati, Farideh
    Morovati, Seyyedeh Pouya
    Jamali, Raika
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2011, 38 (12) : 1122 - 1129
  • [10] Dynamics of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and -8 Secretion in Gingival Crevicular Fluid after Gingival Recession Therapy via MCAT with Either Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft or Collagen Matrix
    Skurska, Anna
    Dymicka-Piekarska, Violetta
    Milewski, Robert
    Pietruska, Malgorzata
    BIOMOLECULES, 2021, 11 (05)