Imaging features of the PI-RADS for predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Choi, Moon Hyung [1 ]
Kim, Dong Hwan [2 ]
Lee, Young Joon [1 ]
Rha, Sung Eun [2 ]
Lee, Ji Youl [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Korea, Eunpyeong St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Eunpyeong St, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul St, 222 Banpo daero, Seoul 06591, South Korea
[3] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul St, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Neoplasm staging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI; EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION; VERSION; CAPSULAR CONTACT; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; LIKERT SCALE; LENGTH; ACCURACY; QUALITY; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-023-01422-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To systematically determine the diagnostic performance of each MRI feature of the PI-RADS for predicting extraprostatic extension (EPE) in prostate cancer.Methods A literature search in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted to identify original studies reporting the accuracy of each feature on MRI for the dichotomous diagnosis of EPE. The meta-analytic pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using a bivariate random-effects model.Results After screening 1955 studies, 17 studies with a total of 3062 men were included. All six imaging features, i.e., bulging prostatic contour, irregular or spiculated margin, asymmetry or invasion of neurovascular bundle, obliteration of rectoprostatic angle, tumor-capsule interface > 10 mm, and breach of the capsule with evidence of direct tumor extension, were significantly associated with EPE. Breach of the capsule with direct tumor extension demonstrated the highest pooled DOR (15.6, 95% CI [7.7-31.5]) followed by tumor-capsule interface > 10 mm (10.5 [5.4-20.2]), asymmetry or invasion of neurovascular bundle (7.6 [3.8-15.2]), and obliteration of rectoprostatic angle (6.1 [3.8-9.8]). Irregular or spiculated margin showed the lowest pooled DOR (2.3 [1.3-4.2]). Breach of the capsule with direct tumor extension and tumor-capsule interface > 10 mm showed the highest pooled specificity (98.0% [96.2-99.0]) and sensitivity (86.3% [70.0-94.4]), respectively.Conclusions Among the six MRI features of prostate cancer, breach of the capsule with direct tumor extension and tumor-capsule interface > 10 mm were the most predictive of EPE with the highest specificity and sensitivity, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] Prediction of extraprostatic extension on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anterior prostate cancer
    Ahn, Hyungwoo
    Hwang, Sung Il
    Lee, Hak Jong
    Suh, Hyoung Sim
    Choe, Gheeyoung
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Lee, Sangchul
    Lee, Joongyub
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 26 - 37
  • [3] Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients
    Alessi, Sarah
    Pricolo, Paola
    Summers, Paul
    Femia, Marco
    Tagliabue, Elena
    Renne, Giuseppe
    Bianchi, Roberto
    Musi, Gennaro
    De Cobelli, Ottavio
    Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja
    Bellomi, Massimo
    Petralia, Giuseppe
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (10) : 5478 - 5487
  • [5] Which one is better for predicting extraprostatic extension on multiparametric MRI: ESUR score, Likert scale, tumor contact length, or EPE grade?
    Asfuroglu, Umut
    Asfuroglu, Berrak Barutcu
    Ozer, Halil
    Gonul, Ipek Isik
    Tokgoz, Nil
    Inan, Mehmet Arda
    Ucar, Murat
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 149
  • [6] Can Extraprostatic Extension Be Predicted by Tumor-Capsule Contact Length in Prostate Cancer? Relationship With International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups
    Bakir, Baris
    Onay, Aslihan
    Vural, Metin
    Armutlu, Ayse
    Yildiz, Sevda Ozel
    Esen, Tarik
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (03) : 588 - 596
  • [7] ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Clements, Richard
    Choyke, Peter
    Verma, Sadhna
    Villeirs, Geert
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Logager, Vibeke
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 746 - 757
  • [8] MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T:: Comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging
    Beyersdorff, D
    Taymoorian, K
    Knösel, T
    Schnorr, D
    Felix, R
    Hamm, B
    Bruhn, H
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (05) : 1214 - 1220
  • [9] Prostate cancer staging with extracapsular extension risk scoring using multiparametric MRI: a correlation with histopathology
    Boesen, Lars
    Chabanova, Elizaveta
    Logager, Vibeke
    Balslev, Ingegerd
    Mikines, Kari
    Thomsen, Henrik S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (06) : 1776 - 1785
  • [10] Development and comparison of a Chinese nomogram adding multi-parametric MRI information for predicting extracapsular extension of prostate cancer
    Chen, Yuke
    Yu, Wei
    Fan, Yu
    Zhou, Liqun
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Huihui
    Jiang, Yuan
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Wu, Shiliang
    Jin, Jie
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (13) : 22095 - 22103