The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology

被引:20
|
作者
Pitman, Martha B. [1 ]
Centeno, Barbara A. [2 ]
Reid, Michelle D. [3 ]
Siddiqui, Momin T. [4 ]
Layfield, Lester J. [5 ]
Perez-Machado, Miguel [6 ]
Weynand, Birgit [7 ]
Stelow, Edward B. [8 ]
Lozano, Maria D. [9 ]
Fukushima, Noriyoshi [10 ]
Cree, Ian A. [11 ]
Mehrotra, Ravi [12 ]
Schmitt, Fernando C. [13 ]
Field, Andrew S. [14 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Pathol, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Emory Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Pathol, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Missouri, Pathol & Anat Sci Dept, Columbia, MO USA
[6] Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, Dept Cellular Pathol, London, England
[7] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Pathol, Leuven, Belgium
[8] Univ Virginia Hosp, Dept Pathol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[9] Clin Univ Navarra, Dept Pathol, Pamplona, Pamplona, Spain
[10] Jichi Med Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Shimotsuke, NSW, Japan
[11] Int Agcy Res Canc IARC, WHO, Lyon, France
[12] Ctr Hlth Innovat & Policy Fdn, Indian Canc Genom Atlas, Noida, India
[13] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Porto, Portugal
[14] Univ New South Wales, St Vincents Hosp, Dept Anat Pathol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Pancreas; Cytology; WHO; Reporting; Terminology; Standardized; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; PAPILLARY-MUCINOUS NEOPLASMS; BILE-DUCT BRUSHINGS; ATYPICAL EPITHELIAL-CELLS; FOLLOW-UP ANALYSIS; EUS-GUIDED FNA; PAPANICOLAOU SOCIETY; CYSTIC NEOPLASMS; CYTOLOGIC FEATURES;
D O I
10.1159/000527912
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with expert contributors from around the world, present an international approach to standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. This reporting system is one of the first in a series from various body sites that mirror the WHO Classification of Tumours series and provides an evidence-based terminology system with associated risk of malignancy and diagnostic management recommendation per diagnostic category. The WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHO system) revises the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology published in 2015 and replaces the six-tiered system with a seven-tiered system: "insufficient/inadequate/nondiagnostic"; "benign (negative for malignancy)," "atypical," "pancreaticobiliary neoplasm of low risk/low grade," "pancreatic neoplasm of high risk/high grade," "suspicious for malignancy," and "malignant." The principal differences between the WHO and the PSC systems revolve around the classification of neoplasia. In the PSC system, there was a single category for "neoplastic" lesions that includes two groups, one for "benign neoplasms" [primarily serous cystadenoma] and one named "other," dominated by premalignant intraductal neoplasms (primarily intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms) and low-grade malignant neoplasms [pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs)]. In the WHO system, benign neoplasms with virtually no risk of malignancy are included in the "benign" category and low-grade malignancies (PanNET and SPN) are included in the "malignant" category, as per the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours, thus leaving in the "neoplasm" category primarily those noninvasive premalignant lesions of the ductal system. These neoplasms are divided by the cytomorphological grade of the epithelium into low risk/low-grade and high risk/high-grade, with distinctly different risks of malignancy. As with the PSC system, the WHO system advocates close correlation with imaging and encourages incorporation of ancillary testing into the final diagnosis, such as biochemical (CEA and amylase) and molecular testing of cyst fluid and bile duct brushings. Key diagnostic cytopathological features of specific lesions or neoplasms, ancillary studies for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, and implications of diagnosis for patient care and management are discussed. In addition, the WHO system includes reporting and diagnostic management options that recognize the variations in the availability of diagnostic and prognostic ancillary testing modalities in low- and middle-income countries, where cytopathology is particularly useful and is increasingly available in the absence of histopathological services.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 320
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A multi-institutional study of salivary gland cytopathology: Application of the milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology in Japan
    Higuchi, Kayoko
    Urano, Makoto
    Akiba, Jun
    Nogami, Miwako
    Hirata, Yukiya
    Zukeran, Yoko
    Moriyoshi, Koki
    Tada, Yuichiro
    Fukushima, Mana
    Obayashi, Mariko
    Sakamoto, Shinnichi
    Kuraoka, Kazuya
    Kira, Kana
    Kawahara, Akihiko
    Kato, Taku
    Tanigawa, Maki
    Nakaguro, Masato
    Yamamoto, Hidetaka
    Nagao, Toshitaka
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2022, 130 (01) : 30 - 40
  • [42] The Impact of the New Proposed Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Terminology for Pancreaticobiliary Cytology in Endoscopic US-FNA: A Single-Institutional Experience
    Saieg, Mauro Ajaj
    Munson, Valerie
    Colletti, Shanna
    Nassar, Aziza
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 123 (08) : 488 - 494
  • [43] The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Cytohistological Study
    Anand, Bakiarathana
    Ramdas, Anita
    Ambroise, Marie Moses
    Kumar, Nirmal P.
    JOURNAL OF THYROID RESEARCH, 2020, 2020
  • [44] Application of the Milan System for Risk Stratification and Its Comparison with a Previous Reporting System of Parotid Gland Cytopathology in a Tertiary Care Centre
    Vallonthaiel, Archana George
    Kaushal, Seema
    Jangir, Hemlata
    Rajendran, Hemanth Kumar
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2018, 62 (5-6) : 352 - 359
  • [45] The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology Explained for Practitioners: Frequently Asked Questions
    Bongiovanni, Massimo
    Papadakis, Georgios E.
    Rouiller, Nathalie
    Marino, Laura
    Lamine, Faiza
    Bisig, Bettina
    Ziadi, Sonia
    Sykiotis, Gerasimos P.
    THYROID, 2018, 28 (05) : 556 - 565
  • [46] Reply to Application of the Milan system for reporting risk stratification in salivary gland cytopathology
    Rohilla, Manish
    Gupta, Nalini
    Singh, Priya
    Rajwanshi, Arvind
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 126 (01) : 71 - 71
  • [47] Outcomes of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: Real-life experience
    Avior, Galit
    Dagan, Or
    Shochat, Isaac
    Frenkel, Yulia
    Tessler, Idit
    Meir, Alona
    Jaffe, Anat
    Cohen, Oded
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 94 (03) : 521 - 527
  • [48] A histological assessment of the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (2010) abnormal categories: a series of 219 consecutive cases
    Tepeoglu, M.
    Bilezikci, B.
    Bayraktar, S. G.
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 25 (01) : 39 - 44
  • [49] The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology: How to Incorporate Molecular Data in Cytopathology Reports
    Pinto, Daniel
    Chandra, Ashish
    Schmitt, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2021, 2 (02): : 66 - 76
  • [50] A correlative study of solitary thyroid nodules using the bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology
    Arul, P.
    Masilamani, Suresh
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 11 (03) : 617 - 622