The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology

被引:20
|
作者
Pitman, Martha B. [1 ]
Centeno, Barbara A. [2 ]
Reid, Michelle D. [3 ]
Siddiqui, Momin T. [4 ]
Layfield, Lester J. [5 ]
Perez-Machado, Miguel [6 ]
Weynand, Birgit [7 ]
Stelow, Edward B. [8 ]
Lozano, Maria D. [9 ]
Fukushima, Noriyoshi [10 ]
Cree, Ian A. [11 ]
Mehrotra, Ravi [12 ]
Schmitt, Fernando C. [13 ]
Field, Andrew S. [14 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Pathol, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Emory Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Pathol, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Missouri, Pathol & Anat Sci Dept, Columbia, MO USA
[6] Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, Dept Cellular Pathol, London, England
[7] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Pathol, Leuven, Belgium
[8] Univ Virginia Hosp, Dept Pathol, Charlottesville, VA USA
[9] Clin Univ Navarra, Dept Pathol, Pamplona, Pamplona, Spain
[10] Jichi Med Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Pathol, Shimotsuke, NSW, Japan
[11] Int Agcy Res Canc IARC, WHO, Lyon, France
[12] Ctr Hlth Innovat & Policy Fdn, Indian Canc Genom Atlas, Noida, India
[13] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Porto, Portugal
[14] Univ New South Wales, St Vincents Hosp, Dept Anat Pathol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Pancreas; Cytology; WHO; Reporting; Terminology; Standardized; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION; PAPILLARY-MUCINOUS NEOPLASMS; BILE-DUCT BRUSHINGS; ATYPICAL EPITHELIAL-CELLS; FOLLOW-UP ANALYSIS; EUS-GUIDED FNA; PAPANICOLAOU SOCIETY; CYSTIC NEOPLASMS; CYTOLOGIC FEATURES;
D O I
10.1159/000527912
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with expert contributors from around the world, present an international approach to standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. This reporting system is one of the first in a series from various body sites that mirror the WHO Classification of Tumours series and provides an evidence-based terminology system with associated risk of malignancy and diagnostic management recommendation per diagnostic category. The WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHO system) revises the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) system for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology published in 2015 and replaces the six-tiered system with a seven-tiered system: "insufficient/inadequate/nondiagnostic"; "benign (negative for malignancy)," "atypical," "pancreaticobiliary neoplasm of low risk/low grade," "pancreatic neoplasm of high risk/high grade," "suspicious for malignancy," and "malignant." The principal differences between the WHO and the PSC systems revolve around the classification of neoplasia. In the PSC system, there was a single category for "neoplastic" lesions that includes two groups, one for "benign neoplasms" [primarily serous cystadenoma] and one named "other," dominated by premalignant intraductal neoplasms (primarily intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms) and low-grade malignant neoplasms [pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs)]. In the WHO system, benign neoplasms with virtually no risk of malignancy are included in the "benign" category and low-grade malignancies (PanNET and SPN) are included in the "malignant" category, as per the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours, thus leaving in the "neoplasm" category primarily those noninvasive premalignant lesions of the ductal system. These neoplasms are divided by the cytomorphological grade of the epithelium into low risk/low-grade and high risk/high-grade, with distinctly different risks of malignancy. As with the PSC system, the WHO system advocates close correlation with imaging and encourages incorporation of ancillary testing into the final diagnosis, such as biochemical (CEA and amylase) and molecular testing of cyst fluid and bile duct brushings. Key diagnostic cytopathological features of specific lesions or neoplasms, ancillary studies for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, and implications of diagnosis for patient care and management are discussed. In addition, the WHO system includes reporting and diagnostic management options that recognize the variations in the availability of diagnostic and prognostic ancillary testing modalities in low- and middle-income countries, where cytopathology is particularly useful and is increasingly available in the absence of histopathological services.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 320
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Welcoming the new, revisiting the old: a brief glance at cytopathology reporting systems for lung, pancreas, and thyroid
    Luis, Rita
    Thirunavukkarasu, Balamurugan
    Jain, Deepali
    Canberk, Sule
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2024, 58 (04) : 165 - 173
  • [32] Announcement: The International System for Reporting Lymph Node Cytopathology
    Zeppa, Pio
    Cozzolino, Immacolata
    Caraway, Nancy P.
    Al-Abbadi, Mousa A.
    Barroca, Helena
    Bode-Lesniewska, Beata
    Calaminici, Maria
    Chhieng, David F.
    Ehinger, Mats
    Geddie, William R.
    Katz, Ruth L.
    Lin, Oscar
    Medeiros, L. Jeffrey
    Monaco, Sara E.
    Rajwanshi, Arvind
    Schmitt, Fernando C.
    Vielh, Philippe
    Field, Andrew S.
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2020, 64 (04) : 299 - 305
  • [33] Diagnostic performance of fine-needle aspiration in soft tissue tumors: Application of the World Health Organization System for Reporting Soft Tissue Cytopathology and risk of malignancy assessment
    Gajdzis, Pawel
    Brisse, Herve J.
    Klijanienko, Jerzy
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2024, 132 (12) : 768 - 778
  • [34] Update on risk stratification in the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology categories: 3-year, prospective, single-institution experience
    Sung, Simon
    Del Portillo, Armando
    Gonda, Tamas A.
    Kluger, Michael D.
    Tiscornia-Wasserman, Patricia G.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 128 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [35] Standardized Categorical Reporting of Cytopathology Results: The Strengths and Weaknesses of a Constantly Evolving and Expanding System
    Grapsa, Dimitra
    Politi, Ekaterini
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 41 (10) : 917 - 921
  • [36] The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Meta-Analysis
    Bongiovanni, Massimo
    Spitale, Alessandra
    Faquin, William C.
    Mazzucchelli, Luca
    Baloch, Zubair W.
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2012, 56 (04) : 333 - 339
  • [37] The diversities in thyroid cytopathology practices among Asian countries using the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology
    Truong Phan Xuan Nguyen
    Vien Thanh Truong
    Kakudo, Kennichi
    Huy Gia Vuong
    GLAND SURGERY, 2020, 9 (05) : 1735 - +
  • [38] The benefits of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for reporting pancreatobiliary cytology: A 2-year review from a single academic institution
    Ozretic, Luka
    Simonovic, Alexandra V.
    Rathbone, Michael L.
    Young, Martin P. A.
    Perez-Machado, Miguel A.
    CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 32 (02) : 227 - 232
  • [39] Malignancy Risk Associated With Diagnostic Categories Defined by the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Pancreaticobiliary Guidelines
    Layfield, Lester J.
    Dodd, Leslie
    Factor, Rachel
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 122 (06) : 420 - 427
  • [40] A Call for Universal Acceptance of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology
    Barbarite, Eric
    Puram, Sidharth V.
    Derakhshan, Adeeb
    Rossi, Esther D.
    Faquin, William C.
    Varvares, Mark A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (01) : 80 - 85