Who benefits from collaborative governance? An empirical study from the energy sector

被引:16
|
作者
Ahn, Minwoo [1 ]
Baldwin, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Collaborative governance; participatory governance; stakeholder engagement; utility regulation; equity; distributional outcomes; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNITY; COPRODUCTION; DELIBERATION; CITIZEN; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2022.2044505
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Collaborative governance can positively affect desired policy outcomes, but questions remain about who benefits. This article asks how and to what extent collaborative governance of utility conservation programmes in the U.S. states affects industrial, commercial, and residential ratepayers' programme benefits. Panel data analysis shows that collaborative processes improve the equitable distribution of energy savings, but inequities persist, particularly for residential ratepayers. Additional qualitative analysis suggests representation in the collaborative process is not a major driver of equitable distribution of benefits, but that over time, collaboration can help participants to look beyond their individual interests and advocate for other stakeholders' interests.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 113
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analyzing the costs and benefits of distributed solar energy in Virginia (USA): a case study of collaborative energy planning
    Pitt, Damian
    Michaud, Gilbert
    Duggan, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 61 (11) : 2032 - 2049
  • [42] Collaborative Governance for Integrated Care: Insights from a Policy Stakeholder Dialogue
    Gordon, Dara
    McKay, Sandra
    Marchildon, Gregory
    Bhatia, R. Sacha
    Shaw, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2020, 20 (01):
  • [43] A participatory decision making framework for artisanal fisheries collaborative governance: Insights from management committees in Chile
    Estevez, Rodrigo A.
    Veloso, Carlos
    Jerez, Gabriel
    Gelcich, Stefan
    NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2020, 44 (02) : 144 - 160
  • [44] Collaborative governance on SO2 pollution from thermal power energy consumption: Evidence from Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China
    Feng, Qiang
    Sun, Tao
    Liu, Xiaorui
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2023,
  • [45] Who benefits from cycling initiatives? An evaluation of perceived effectiveness and differences among population groups
    Jahanshahi, Danial
    Costello, Seosamh B.
    Dirks, Kim Natasha
    van Wee, Bert
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2023, 13
  • [46] Who benefits from increased service utilisation? Examining the distributional effects of payment for performance in Tanzania
    Peter Binyaruka
    Bjarne Robberstad
    Gaute Torsvik
    Josephine Borghi
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 17
  • [47] Who benefits from increased service utilisation? Examining the distributional effects of payment for performance in Tanzania
    Binyaruka, Peter
    Robberstad, Bjarne
    Torsvik, Gaute
    Borghi, Josephine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2018, 17
  • [48] Lessons from collaborative governance and sociobiology theories for reinforcing sustained cooperation: a government food security case study
    Montoya, L. A.
    Montoya, I.
    Sanchez Gonzalez, O. D.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 129 (07) : 916 - 931
  • [49] Who benefits from tuberculosis outpatient services in Enugu state, Nigeria? A benefit incidence analysis
    Ezenwaka, Uchenna
    Mao, Wenhui
    Obikeze, Eric
    Dixit, Siddharth
    Arize, Ifeyinwa
    Ogbuoji, Osondu
    Onwujekwe, Obinna
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2022, 27 (06) : 592 - 601
  • [50] Public administration with collaborative governance-from the perspective of social resource distribution
    Xu Yan-qing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (ICETMS 2013), 2013, : 223 - 226