Who benefits from collaborative governance? An empirical study from the energy sector

被引:16
|
作者
Ahn, Minwoo [1 ]
Baldwin, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Collaborative governance; participatory governance; stakeholder engagement; utility regulation; equity; distributional outcomes; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNITY; COPRODUCTION; DELIBERATION; CITIZEN; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2022.2044505
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Collaborative governance can positively affect desired policy outcomes, but questions remain about who benefits. This article asks how and to what extent collaborative governance of utility conservation programmes in the U.S. states affects industrial, commercial, and residential ratepayers' programme benefits. Panel data analysis shows that collaborative processes improve the equitable distribution of energy savings, but inequities persist, particularly for residential ratepayers. Additional qualitative analysis suggests representation in the collaborative process is not a major driver of equitable distribution of benefits, but that over time, collaboration can help participants to look beyond their individual interests and advocate for other stakeholders' interests.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 113
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Understanding collaborative governance from a communication network perspective: A case study of the Atlantic Salmon recovery framework
    Flye, Melissa E.
    Sponarski, Carly C.
    Zydlewski, Joseph D.
    McGreavy, Bridie
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2021, 115 : 79 - 90
  • [32] Improving the Effectiveness of Collaborative Governance Regimes: Lessons from Watershed Partnerships
    Biddle, Jennifer C.
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 143 (09)
  • [33] Who benefits from shifting metal-to-pedal? Equity in the health tradeoffs of cycling
    Braun, Lindsay M.
    Le, Huyen T. K.
    Voulgaris, Carole Turley
    Nethery, Rachel C.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 115
  • [34] Good governance and corruption in the health sector: lessons from the Karnataka experience
    Huss, R.
    Green, A.
    Sudarshan, H.
    Karpagam, S. S.
    Ramani, K. V.
    Tomson, G.
    Gerein, N.
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2011, 26 (06) : 471 - 484
  • [35] Collaborative governance outcomes and obstacles: Evidence from Portuguese armed forces
    Moreno, Diogo
    Goncalves, Tiago
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [36] Study on Cross-border Haze Collaborative Governance from Perspective of Prevention and Control in Risk Society
    Dong Shuai
    Liu Zhi-yong
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (12TH) & INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON WEST AFRICAN STUDIES (1ST), VOL I, 2017, : 570 - 577
  • [37] Who benefits from public health financing in Zimbabwe? Towards universal health coverage
    Shamu, Shepherd
    January, James
    Rusakaniko, Simbarashe
    GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 12 (09) : 1169 - 1182
  • [38] Who benefits from healthcare spending in Cambodia? Evidence for a universal health coverage policy
    Asante, Augustine D.
    Ir, Por
    Jacobs, Bart
    Supon, Limwattananon
    Liverani, Marco
    Hayen, Andrew
    Jan, Stephen
    Wiseman, Virginia
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2019, 34 : i4 - i13
  • [39] Who pays and who benefits from health care? An assessment of equity in health care financing and benefit distribution in Tanzania
    Mtei, Gemini
    Makawia, Suzan
    Ally, Mariam
    Kuwawenaruwa, August
    Meheus, Filip
    Borghi, Josephine
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2012, 27 : i23 - i34
  • [40] Measuring brand equity for organising brand management in the energy sector - A research proposal and first empirical hints Part 2: Concept and results of an empirical study in the German energy market
    Klaus-Peter Wiedmann
    Journal of Brand Management, 2005, 12 (3) : 207 - 219