Who benefits from collaborative governance? An empirical study from the energy sector

被引:16
|
作者
Ahn, Minwoo [1 ]
Baldwin, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Collaborative governance; participatory governance; stakeholder engagement; utility regulation; equity; distributional outcomes; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNITY; COPRODUCTION; DELIBERATION; CITIZEN; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2022.2044505
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Collaborative governance can positively affect desired policy outcomes, but questions remain about who benefits. This article asks how and to what extent collaborative governance of utility conservation programmes in the U.S. states affects industrial, commercial, and residential ratepayers' programme benefits. Panel data analysis shows that collaborative processes improve the equitable distribution of energy savings, but inequities persist, particularly for residential ratepayers. Additional qualitative analysis suggests representation in the collaborative process is not a major driver of equitable distribution of benefits, but that over time, collaboration can help participants to look beyond their individual interests and advocate for other stakeholders' interests.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 113
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Urban flood risk and green infrastructure: Who is exposed to risk and who benefits from investment? A case study of three US Cities
    Pallathadka, Arun
    Sauer, Jason
    Chang, Heejun
    Grimm, Nancy B.
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2022, 223
  • [22] Generating Inclusive Health Benefits from Urban Green Spaces: An Empirical Study of Beijing Olympic Forest Park
    He, Jialin
    Li, Li
    Li, Jiaming
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [23] Who benefits from bus rapid transit? Evidence from the Metro Bus System (MBS) in Lahore
    Zolnik, Edmund J.
    Malik, Ammar
    Irvin-Erickson, Yasemin
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 71 : 139 - 149
  • [24] A Case Study of the Interaction between NSOs and Practical NPOs: From the Perspective of Collaborative Governance Theory
    Xiang Xunyu
    Xu Yushan
    CHINA NONPROFIT REVIEW, 2019, 11 (01) : 139 - 152
  • [25] Collaborative approaches to governance for water and Indigenous peoples: A case study from British Columbia, Canada
    von der Porten, Suzanne
    de Loe, Robert C.
    GEOFORUM, 2013, 50 : 149 - 160
  • [26] When Policy Hits the Ground. An Empirical Study of the Communication Practices of Project Managers of a Water Board in Conversations for Collaborative Governance
    Lems, P.
    Aarts, N.
    van Woerkum, C. M. J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2013, 23 (04) : 234 - 246
  • [27] Who benefits from taxation of forest products in Nepal's community forests?
    Lund, Jens Friis
    Baral, Keshab
    Bhandari, Nirmala Singh
    Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal
    Larsen, Helle Overgaard
    Nielsen, Oystein Juul
    Puri, Lila
    Rutt, Rebecca Leigh
    Treue, Thorsten
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 38 : 119 - 125
  • [28] Who Benefits from Recreational Use of Protected Areas?
    Booth, Josephine E.
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2010, 15 (03):
  • [29] Social innovation for urban liveability. Empirical evidence from the Italian third sector
    Garrone, Paola
    Groppi, Angelamaria
    Nardi, Paolo
    INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2018, 25 (06) : 612 - 631
  • [30] Participatory governance in decentralized energy transition: long-term findings from a municipal case study in Germany
    Baasch, Stefanie
    Maschke, Judith
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2025,