Who benefits from collaborative governance? An empirical study from the energy sector

被引:16
|
作者
Ahn, Minwoo [1 ]
Baldwin, Elizabeth [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Govt & Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
Collaborative governance; participatory governance; stakeholder engagement; utility regulation; equity; distributional outcomes; PARTICIPATION; COMMUNITY; COPRODUCTION; DELIBERATION; CITIZEN; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2022.2044505
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Collaborative governance can positively affect desired policy outcomes, but questions remain about who benefits. This article asks how and to what extent collaborative governance of utility conservation programmes in the U.S. states affects industrial, commercial, and residential ratepayers' programme benefits. Panel data analysis shows that collaborative processes improve the equitable distribution of energy savings, but inequities persist, particularly for residential ratepayers. Additional qualitative analysis suggests representation in the collaborative process is not a major driver of equitable distribution of benefits, but that over time, collaboration can help participants to look beyond their individual interests and advocate for other stakeholders' interests.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 113
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] COPRODUCING "CLEAN" COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE Examples from the United States and China
    Rosenbloom, David H.
    Gong, Ting
    PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2013, 36 (04) : 544 - 561
  • [12] Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: a transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations
    Bodin, Orjan
    Robins, Garry
    McAllister, Ryan R. J.
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    Crona, Beatrice
    Tengo, Maria
    Lubell, Mark
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (01):
  • [13] Who benefits most from influenza vaccination policy: a study among the elderly in Beijing, China
    Li, Tongtong
    Lv, Min
    Lei, Trudy
    Wu, Jiang
    Pang, Xinghuo
    Deng, Ying
    Xie, Zheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2016, 15
  • [15] An evolutionary game study on the collaborative governance of environmental pollution: from the perspective of regulatory capture
    Hu, Zikun
    Wang, Yina
    Zhang, Hao
    Liao, Wenjun
    Tao, Tingyu
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 11
  • [16] Implementation of collaborative governance in cross-sector innovation and education networks: evidence from the National Health Service in England
    Ovseiko, Pavel V.
    O'Sullivan, Catherine
    Powell, Susan C.
    Davies, Stephen M.
    Buchan, Alastair M.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [17] Influences on trust during collaborative forest governance: a case study from Haida Gwaii
    Hotte, Ngaio
    Wyatt, Stephen
    Kozak, Robert
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2019, 49 (04) : 361 - 374
  • [18] Implementation of collaborative governance in cross-sector innovation and education networks: evidence from the National Health Service in England
    Pavel V Ovseiko
    Catherine O’Sullivan
    Susan C Powell
    Stephen M Davies
    Alastair M Buchan
    BMC Health Services Research, 14
  • [19] Implementation of collaborative governance in cross-sector innovation and education networks: evidence from the National Health Service in England
    Pavel Ovseiko
    Catherine O’Sullivan
    Susan Powell
    Stephen Davies
    Alastair Buchan
    BMC Health Services Research, 14 (Suppl 2)
  • [20] Benefits from and threats to European treeline ecosystem services: an exploratory study of stakeholders and governance
    Sarkki, Simo
    Ficko, Andrej
    Grunewald, Karsten
    Nijnik, Maria
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 (07) : 2019 - 2032