MAGNETIC SPHINCTER AUGMENTATION DEVICE FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE: EFFECTIVE, BUT POSTOPERATIVE DYSPHAGIA AND RISK OF EROSION SHOULD NOT BE UNDERESTIMATED. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

被引:2
作者
Valinoti, Agustin Cesar [1 ]
Angeramo, Cristian Agustin [1 ]
Dreifuss, Nicolas [1 ]
Herbella, Fernando Augusto Mardiros [2 ]
Schlottmann, Francisco [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Aleman Buenos Aires, Esophagus & Stomach Surg Unit, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Med, Surg, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
来源
ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY | 2023年 / 36卷
关键词
Gastroesophageal Reflux; Esophagus; Laparoscopy; LAPAROSCOPIC NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; EXPERIENCE; EFFICACY; SYMPTOMS; SAFETY; LINX;
D O I
10.1590/0102-672020230063e1781
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Magnetic ring (MSA) implantation in the esophagus is an alternative surgical procedure to fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. AIMS:The aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: A systematic literature review of articles on MSA was performed using the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline) database between 2008 and 2021, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A random-effect model was used to generate a pooled proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI) across all studies. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies comprising 4,663 patients with MSA were analysed. Mean follow-up was 27.3 (7-108) months. The weighted pooled proportion of symptom improvement and patient satisfaction were 93% (95%CI 83-98%) and 85% (95%CI 78-90%), respectively. The mean DeMeester score (pre-MSA: 34.6 vs. post-MSA: 8.9, p=0.03) and GERD-HRQL score (pre-MSA: 25.8 vs. post-MSA: 4.4, p<0.0001) improved significantly after MSA. The proportion of patients taking proton pump inhibitor (PPIs) decreased from 92.8 to 12.4% (p<0.0001). The weighted pooled proportions of dysphagia, endoscopic dilatation and gas-related symptoms were 18, 13, and 3%, respectively. Esophageal erosion occurred in 1% of patients, but its risk significantly increased for every year of MSA use (odds ratio - OR 1.40, 95%CI 1.11-1.77, p=0.004). Device removal was needed in 4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although MSA is a very effective treatment modality for GERD, postoperative dysphagia is common and the risk of esophageal erosion increases over time. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term safety of MSA placement in patients with GERD
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Worldwide Experience with Erosion of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device
    Alicuben, Evan T.
    Bell, Reginald C. W.
    Jobe, Blair A.
    Buckley, F. P., III
    Smith, C. Daniel
    Graybeal, Casey J.
    Lipham, John C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (08) : 1442 - 1447
  • [2] LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: WERE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? PARTIAL OR TOTAL FUNDOPLICATION?
    Allaix, Marco Ettore
    Rebecchi, Fabrizio
    Bellocchia, Alex
    Morino, Mario
    Patti, Marco Giuseppe
    [J]. ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 36 (01):
  • [3] Fundic gastropexy for high risk of recurrence laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and esophageal sphincter augmentation (LINX) improves outcomes without altering perioperative course
    Allman, Robert
    Speicher, James
    Rogers, Austin
    Ledbetter, Ethan
    Oliver, Aundrea
    Iannettoni, Mark
    Anciano, Carlos
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (07): : 3998 - 4002
  • [4] Short-Term Outcomes Predict Long-Term Satisfaction in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation
    Antiporda, Michael
    Jackson, Chloe
    Smith, C. Daniel
    Bowers, Steven P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (02): : 198 - 202
  • [5] Removal of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device Surgical Technique and Results of a Single-center Cohort Study
    Asti, Emanuele
    Siboni, Stefano
    Lazzari, Veronica
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Sironi, Andrea
    Bonavina, Luigi
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 265 (05) : 941 - 945
  • [6] Ayazi S, 2020, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V230, P733, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.01.026
  • [7] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Postoperative Dysphagia: Characterization, Clinical Risk Factors, and Management
    Ayazi, Shahin
    Zheng, Ping
    Zaidi, Ali H.
    Chovanec, Kristy
    Chowdhury, Nobel
    Salvitti, Madison
    Komatsu, Yoshihiro
    Omstead, Ashten N.
    Hoppo, Toshitaka
    Jobe, Blair A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2020, 24 (01) : 39 - 49
  • [8] Severe Dysphagia is Rare After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation
    Bologheanu, Milena
    Matic, Aleksa
    Feka, Joy
    Asari, Reza
    Bologheanu, Razvan
    Riegler, Franz M.
    Gensthaler, Lisa
    Osmokrovic, Bogdan
    Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 46 (09) : 2243 - 2250
  • [9] Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up
    Bona, Davide
    Saino, Greta
    Mini, Emanuele
    Lombardo, Francesca
    Panizzo, Valerio
    Cavalli, Marta
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Campanelli, Giampiero
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2021, 406 (07) : 2545 - 2551
  • [10] Three-year clinical experience with magnetic sphincter augmentation and laparoscopic fundoplication
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Horbach, Thomas
    Schoppmann, Sebastian F.
    DeMarchi, Janet
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (07): : 3449 - 3458