Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implant-Supported Single Crown and ToothSupported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Turkiye

被引:1
|
作者
Tekpinar, Lfitfiye [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Yig, Vahit [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Nezahat Kelesoglu Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Econ, Konya, Turkiye
[2] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Nezahat Kelesoglu Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Management, Konya, Turkiye
[3] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Hosp Management, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Isparta, Turkiye
[4] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Hlth Management, Isparta, Turkiye
[5] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Nezahat Kelesoglu Fac Hlth Sci, Yaka Dist Beysehir Str,D Block 281,Room S17, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; dental economics; Markov model; quality-adjusted prosthesis year; Turkiye; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; TOOTH REPLACEMENT; COMPLICATION RATES; SURVIVAL; INTERVENTIONS; OVERDENTURES; DENTISTRY; TEETH; FDPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2024.01.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The most cost-effective option for replacing lost teeth is not evident because there is a dearth of evidence-based information on implant-supported single crowns versus tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses. This study conducted the analysis of cost-effectiveness of implant-supported single crown and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses from a social perspective in Turkiye. Methods: Costs were calculated in the analysis from a social perspective for 2021. Costs and quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY) values were computed over a 20-year period in the study using the Markov model. The computed values were discounted by 5%. The results are presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. To assess the impact of uncertainty on cost-effectiveness analyses, a tornado diagram and Monte Carlo simulations were created. Results: Throughout the 20-year time horizon, tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses cost $985.58 cumulatively, whereas implant-supported single crown cost $2161.64 (US $1 = 9.22 (sic) as of 15 October 2021). The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is 1.333 per QAPY. Compared with the implant-supported single crown tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses, it offers a QAPY of 0.882 over a 20-year period, while costing an additional $1176.06. Conclusions: These results suggest that the implant-supported single crown provided higher QAPY value but was costlier. When the research's findings are compared with the literature, it becomes clear that Turkiye has lower dental care expenses than most other nations.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 17
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Digitally Produced Fiber-Reinforced Composite Substructures for Three-Unit Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    Suzuki, Marcelo
    Carvalho, Ricardo M.
    Hirata, Ronaldo
    Lubelski, Will
    Bonfante, Gerson
    Pegoraro, Thiago A.
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (02) : 321 - 329
  • [42] Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis
    Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela
    Joda, Tim
    Weber, Hans-Peter
    Bragger, Urs
    PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) : 141 - 151
  • [43] Impact of Implant Angulation on Stress Distribution and Survival Rate of Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Prospective Clinical Study
    Gajbhiye, Ojas Anand
    Parmar, Vishal B.
    Begum, Fouziya
    Hussaini, Syed Mehmood
    Chandra, Sarath
    Sonikumari
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 (SUPPL 4) : S3215 - S3217
  • [44] Mechanosensation and maximum bite force in edentulous patients rehabilitated with bimaxillary implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
    Luraschi, Julien
    Schimmel, Martin
    Bernard, Jean-Pierre
    Gallucci, German O.
    Belser, Urs
    Mueller, Frauke
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (05) : 577 - 583
  • [45] Full-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: An updated systematic review
    AlTarawneh, Sandra
    Thalji, Ghadeer
    Cooper, Lyndon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [46] Occlusion for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients: a literature review and current concepts
    Yuan, Judy Chia-Chun
    Sukotjo, Cortino
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2013, 43 (02) : 51 - 57
  • [47] Prevention and Management of Cheek and/or Tongue Biting Related to Posterior Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses (ISFDPs)
    Afrashtehfar, Kelvin, I
    Balser, Urs C.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (07): : 837 - 839
  • [48] An Up-to-15-Year Comparison of the Survival and Complication Burden of Three-Unit Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses and Implant-Supported Single Crowns
    Walton, Terry R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (04) : 851 - 861
  • [49] Resistance to Fracture in Fixed Dental Prostheses Over Cemented and Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Zirconia Cantilevers in the Anterior Region: An In Vitro Study
    Rues, Stefan
    Kappel, Stefanie
    Ruckes, Dorothee
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Zenthoefer, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2020, 35 (03) : 521 - 529
  • [50] Tilted implants for implant-supported fixed hybrid prostheses: retrospective review
    Seok, Woo-Hyun
    Yun, Pil-Young
    Chang, Na-Hee
    Kim, Young-Kyun
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2023, 49 (05) : 278 - 286