Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implant-Supported Single Crown and ToothSupported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Turkiye

被引:1
|
作者
Tekpinar, Lfitfiye [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Yig, Vahit [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Nezahat Kelesoglu Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Econ, Konya, Turkiye
[2] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Nezahat Kelesoglu Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Management, Konya, Turkiye
[3] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Hosp Management, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Isparta, Turkiye
[4] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Hlth Management, Isparta, Turkiye
[5] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Nezahat Kelesoglu Fac Hlth Sci, Yaka Dist Beysehir Str,D Block 281,Room S17, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; dental economics; Markov model; quality-adjusted prosthesis year; Turkiye; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; TOOTH REPLACEMENT; COMPLICATION RATES; SURVIVAL; INTERVENTIONS; OVERDENTURES; DENTISTRY; TEETH; FDPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2024.01.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The most cost-effective option for replacing lost teeth is not evident because there is a dearth of evidence-based information on implant-supported single crowns versus tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses. This study conducted the analysis of cost-effectiveness of implant-supported single crown and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses from a social perspective in Turkiye. Methods: Costs were calculated in the analysis from a social perspective for 2021. Costs and quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY) values were computed over a 20-year period in the study using the Markov model. The computed values were discounted by 5%. The results are presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. To assess the impact of uncertainty on cost-effectiveness analyses, a tornado diagram and Monte Carlo simulations were created. Results: Throughout the 20-year time horizon, tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses cost $985.58 cumulatively, whereas implant-supported single crown cost $2161.64 (US $1 = 9.22 (sic) as of 15 October 2021). The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is 1.333 per QAPY. Compared with the implant-supported single crown tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses, it offers a QAPY of 0.882 over a 20-year period, while costing an additional $1176.06. Conclusions: These results suggest that the implant-supported single crown provided higher QAPY value but was costlier. When the research's findings are compared with the literature, it becomes clear that Turkiye has lower dental care expenses than most other nations.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 17
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of technical, biological, and esthetic parameters of ceramic and metal-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Meng-Long
    Lin, Hong
    Zhang, You-Dong
    Han, Jian-Min
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (01) : 26 - +
  • [32] RESEARCH AND EDUCATION Maintenance protocols for implant-supported dental prostheses: A scoping review
    Soares, Pablo Machado
    Silveira, Gabriela do Amaral
    Goncalves, Luciano de Souza
    Bacchi, Atais
    Pereira, Gabriel Kalil Rocha
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (01) : 59 - 71
  • [33] Fit of 3Y-TZP complete-arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses before and after porcelain veneering
    Svanborg, Per
    Saarva, Veronika Norstrom
    Stenport, Victoria
    Eliasson, Alf
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 122 (02) : 137 - 141
  • [34] Satisfaction and preferences among patients with both implant-supported single crown and tooth-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a pilot study
    Thieu, Minh Khai Le
    Mauland, Erik Klepsland
    Verket, Anders
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 81 (05) : 358 - 362
  • [35] Prognosis of implants and abutment teeth under combined tooth-implant-supported and solely implant-supported double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Bernhart, Gunda
    Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo
    Schmitter, Marc
    Schwarz, Stefanie
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (07) : 813 - 818
  • [36] An International Survey among Prosthodontists of the Use of Mandibular Implant-Supported Dental Prostheses
    Kronstrom, Mats
    Carlsson, Gunnar E.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2019, 28 (02): : E622 - E626
  • [37] The prognosis of partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilevers. A 5-year retrospective cohort study
    Malo, Paulo
    Nobre, Miguel de Araujo
    Lopes, Armando
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2013, 6 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [38] Survival rates and complication behaviour of tooth implant-supported, fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Von Stein-Lausnitz, Manja
    Nickenig, Hans-Joachim
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Neumann, Konrad
    Von Stein-Lausnitz, Axel
    Spies, Benedikt Christopher
    Baler, Florian
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2019, 88
  • [39] Prospective evaluation of zirconia based tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: 3-Year results
    Konstantinidis, Ioannis K.
    Jacoby, Stephan
    Raedel, Michael
    Boening, Klaus
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2015, 43 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [40] The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review
    Le, M.
    Papia, E.
    Larsson, C.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 42 (06) : 467 - 480