Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Implant-Supported Single Crown and ToothSupported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Turkiye

被引:1
|
作者
Tekpinar, Lfitfiye [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Yig, Vahit [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Nezahat Kelesoglu Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Econ, Konya, Turkiye
[2] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Nezahat Kelesoglu Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Management, Konya, Turkiye
[3] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Dept Hosp Management, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Isparta, Turkiye
[4] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Hlth Management, Isparta, Turkiye
[5] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Nezahat Kelesoglu Fac Hlth Sci, Yaka Dist Beysehir Str,D Block 281,Room S17, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
cost-effectiveness analysis; dental economics; Markov model; quality-adjusted prosthesis year; Turkiye; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; TOOTH REPLACEMENT; COMPLICATION RATES; SURVIVAL; INTERVENTIONS; OVERDENTURES; DENTISTRY; TEETH; FDPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2024.01.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The most cost-effective option for replacing lost teeth is not evident because there is a dearth of evidence-based information on implant-supported single crowns versus tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses. This study conducted the analysis of cost-effectiveness of implant-supported single crown and tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses from a social perspective in Turkiye. Methods: Costs were calculated in the analysis from a social perspective for 2021. Costs and quality-adjusted prosthesis year (QAPY) values were computed over a 20-year period in the study using the Markov model. The computed values were discounted by 5%. The results are presented as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. To assess the impact of uncertainty on cost-effectiveness analyses, a tornado diagram and Monte Carlo simulations were created. Results: Throughout the 20-year time horizon, tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses cost $985.58 cumulatively, whereas implant-supported single crown cost $2161.64 (US $1 = 9.22 (sic) as of 15 October 2021). The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is 1.333 per QAPY. Compared with the implant-supported single crown tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses, it offers a QAPY of 0.882 over a 20-year period, while costing an additional $1176.06. Conclusions: These results suggest that the implant-supported single crown provided higher QAPY value but was costlier. When the research's findings are compared with the literature, it becomes clear that Turkiye has lower dental care expenses than most other nations.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 17
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Different Connector Designs for All-Ceramic Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses
    Alberto, Laura H. J.
    Kalluri, Lohitha
    Esquivel-Upshaw, Josephine F.
    Duan, Yuanyuan
    CERAMICS-SWITZERLAND, 2022, 5 (01): : 34 - 43
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of Anterior Implants versus Fixed Dental Prostheses
    Zitzmann, N. U.
    Krastl, G.
    Weiger, R.
    Kuehl, S.
    Sendi, P.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 92 (S12) : 183S - 188S
  • [23] Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions: State of the art and future perspectives
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    Fanti, Raffaele
    Mancini, Leonardo
    Imber, Jean-Claude
    Stahli, Alexandra
    Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
    Schimmel, Martin
    Sculean, Anton
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2023, 16 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [24] Oral and Periodontal Risk Factors of Prosthetic Success for 3-Unit Natural Tooth-Supported Bridges versus Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses
    Cristea, Ioana
    Agop-Forna, Doriana
    Martu, Maria-Alexandra
    Dascalu, Cristina
    Topoliceanu, Claudiu
    Torok, Roland
    Torok, Bianca
    Bardis, Dimitrios
    Bardi, Panagiota Moulavasili
    Forna, Norina
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [25] Comparative evaluation of BioHPP and titanium as a framework veneered with composite resin for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
    Jin, Hang-ying
    Teng, Min-hua
    Wang, Zhen-jun
    Li, Xin
    Liang, Jia-yue
    Wang, Wen-xue
    Jiang, Shuai
    Zhao, Bao-dong
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 122 (04) : 383 - 388
  • [26] Treatment with Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Patients with Congenital and Acquired Neurologic Disabilities: A Prospective Study
    Ekfeldt, Anders
    Zellmer, Mia
    Carlsson, Gunnar E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2013, 26 (06) : 517 - 524
  • [27] Complication and Failure Rates with Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses and Single Crowns: A 10-Year Retrospective Study
    Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela
    Buser, Daniel
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    Buergin, Walter
    Hicklin, Stefan
    Braegger, Urs
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (03) : 356 - 364
  • [28] Reliability and fatigue failure modes of implant-supported aluminum-oxide fixed dental prostheses
    Stappert, Christian F. J.
    Baldassarri, Marta
    Zhang, Yu
    Haenssler, Felix
    Rekow, Elizabeth D.
    Thompson, Van P.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (10) : 1173 - 1180
  • [29] Peri-Implant Diseases and Biologic Complications at Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses in Partially Edentulous Patients
    Tsigarida, Alexandra
    Chochlidakis, Konstantinos
    Fraser, David
    Lampraki, Evangelia
    Einarsdottir, Erna R.
    Barmak, Abdul Basir
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    Ercoli, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (05): : 429 - 435
  • [30] Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review
    Abdulmajeed, Aous A.
    Lim, Kevin G.
    Naerhi, Timo O.
    Cooper, Lyndon F.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (06) : 672 - 677