Setting standards for SDLMI fidelity: Promoting Data-driven decision making to advance Self-determination instruction

被引:1
作者
Shogren, Karrie A. [1 ,4 ]
Pace, Jesse R. [1 ,2 ]
Hicks, Tyler A. [1 ]
Raley, Sheida K. [1 ,3 ]
Lane, Kathleen Lynne [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Lawrence, KS USA
[2] Utah Valley Univ, Orem, UT USA
[3] Univ Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Ctr Dev Disabil, 1200 Sunnyside Ave,Haworth Hall 3111, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
fidelity of implementation; inclusive education; self-determination; standards setting; LEARNING-MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/pits.23068
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study used the standard setting to establish cutscores for the fidelity of implementation of an evidence-based intervention, the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI) designed to enhance goal-directed actions in secondary students with and without disabilities. Cutscores were then applied to fidelity data from a large, randomized trial of the SDLMI with teacher implementers. Findings suggest teachers demonstrate a range of fidelity outcomes over time across three dimensions adherence, quality of delivery, and student responsiveness. Almost all teachers (93%) immediately meet cutscores for the adherence dimension after training, but smaller numbers meet cutscores for quality of delivery (64%) and student responsiveness (69%). However, the quality of delivery and student responsiveness showed growth over time with implementation experience and there was a small effect of intensifying implementation support. The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI) is implemented by teachers to support students in setting goals and implementing action plans, problem-solving, and self-regulating their learning as they revise their goals and action plans.It is important to understand how teachers implement the SDLMI in inclusive classrooms.Teachers can implement the SDLMI with their students, and their quality of delivery and student responsiveness to the SDLMI grows over time as teachers get coaching and implementation support.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 552
页数:21
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Ando T., 2007, BAYESIAN MODEL SELEC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach
[3]   Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium [J].
Bellg, AJ ;
Borrelli, B ;
Resnick, B ;
Hecht, J ;
Minicucci, DS ;
Ory, M ;
Ogedegbe, G ;
Orwig, D ;
Ernst, D ;
Czajkowski, S .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 23 (05) :443-451
[4]   A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research [J].
Borrelli, B ;
Sepinwall, D ;
Ernst, D ;
Bellg, AJ ;
Czajkowski, S ;
Breger, R ;
DeFrancesco, C ;
Levesque, C ;
Sharp, DL ;
Ogedegbe, G ;
Resnick, B ;
Orwig, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 73 (05) :852-860
[5]   Treatment Integrity of Primary (Tier 1) Prevention Efforts in Tiered Systems: Mapping the Literature [J].
Buckman, Mark Mathew ;
Lane, Kathleen Lynne ;
Common, Eric Alan ;
Royer, David James ;
Oakes, Wendy Peia ;
Allen, Grant Edmund ;
Lane, Katie Scarlett ;
Brunsting, Nelson C. .
EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN, 2021, 44 (03) :145-168
[6]  
Buckman MM, 2022, HANDBOOK OF SPECIAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, VOL. 2, P19, DOI 10.4324/9781003156888-3
[7]   A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity [J].
Carroll, Christopher ;
Patterson, Malcolm ;
Wood, Stephen ;
Booth, Andrew ;
Rick, Jo ;
Balain, Shashi .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2007, 2
[8]  
Center on IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems and Early Childhood TA Center, 2019, EV IMPL EV BAS PRACT
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[10]  
Fixsen D.L., 2010, Evidenced-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents, P435