Evaluating age-based eligibility thresholds for heart re-transplantation-an analysis of the united network for organ sharing database

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Qiudong [1 ]
Malas, Jad [1 ]
Chan, Joshua [1 ]
Esmailian, Gabriel [3 ]
Emerson, Dominic [1 ]
Megna, Dominick [1 ]
Catarino, Pedro [1 ]
Bowdish, Michael E. [1 ]
Kittleson, Michelle [2 ]
Patel, Jignesh [2 ]
Chikwe, Joanna [1 ]
Kobashigawa, Jon [2 ]
Esmailian, Fardad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Smidt Heart Inst, Dept Cardiac Surg, 127 South San Vicente Blvd A-3103, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Smidt Heart Inst, Dept Cardiol, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] George Washington, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Washington, DC USA
来源
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
heart retransplantation; patient selection; recipient age; United Network for Organ Sharing Registry; outcomes; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; CARDIAC RETRANSPLANTATION; LISTING CRITERIA; OUTCOMES; REGISTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.healun.2022.11.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Risk-adjusted survival after late heart re-transplantation may be comparable to primary transplant, but the efficacy of re-transplantation in older candidates is not established. We evaluated outcomes after heart re-transplantation in recipients > 60 years.METHODS: We identified 1026 adult patients undergoing isolated heart re-transplantation between 2003 and 2020 from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Older recipients (> 60 years, n=177) were compared to younger recipients (& LE; 60 years, n=849). Five and ten-year post-transplant survival was estimated using the Kalpan-Meier method and adjusted with multivariable Cox models. RESULTS: Older recipients were more likely to be male and have diabetes or previous malignancies with higher baseline creatinine. They also more frequently required pre-transplant ECMO (11.9% vs. 6.8%, p=0.02) and received re-transplantation due to primary graft failure (13.6% vs. 8.5%, p=0.03). After the transplant, older recipients had a higher incidence of stroke (6.8% vs. 2.6%, p=0.01) and dialysis requirements (20.3% vs. 13.2%) before discharge (both p<0.05), and more frequently died from malignancy-related causes (16.3% vs. 3.9%, p<0.001). After adjustment, recipient age >60 was associated with an increased risk of both 5-year (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.02-2.01, p=0.04) and 10-year mortality (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.20-2.45, p=0.003). Restricted cubic spline showed a non-linear relationship between recipient age and 10-year mortality.CONCLUSIONS: Heart re-transplantation in recipients > 60 years has inferior outcomes compared to younger recipients. Strict patient selection and close follow-up are warranted to ensure the appropriate utilization of donor hearts and to improve long-term outcomes.& COPY; 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 602
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Should Age-Based Eligibility Thresholds Differ for Repeat Heart Transplantation? Analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing Database
    Chen, Q.
    Roach, A.
    Chan, J.
    Gill, G.
    Rowe, G.
    Alhossan, A.
    Thomas, J.
    Peiris, A.
    Megna, D.
    Esmailian, F.
    Catarino, P.
    Chikwe, J.
    Emerson, D.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (04): : S79 - S80
  • [2] Evaluating Matching by Predicted Heart Mass in Adolescent Heart Transplantation: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database
    Lee, J.
    Kidambi, S.
    Rosenthal, D.
    Nasirov, T.
    Dykes, J.
    Ma, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S221 - S221
  • [3] Repeat pediatric heart transplantation: A united network for organ sharing database analysis
    Rowe, Georgina
    Gill, George
    Zubair, M. Mujeeb
    Chen, Qiudong
    Thomas, Jason
    Timbalia, Shrishiv A. A.
    Osho, Asishana A. A.
    Emerson, Dominic
    Kim, Richard
    Bowdish, Michael E. E.
    Chikwe, Joanna
    Turek, Joseph W. W.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 37 (11)
  • [4] Repeat Pediatric Heart Transplantation in the United States: United Network for Organ Sharing Database Analysis
    Rowe, G.
    Gill, G.
    Chen, Q.
    Zubair, M.
    Roach, A.
    Alhossan, A.
    Peiris, A.
    Thomas, J.
    Emerson, D.
    Kim, R.
    Chikwe, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 41 (04): : S171 - S171
  • [5] Heart Transplantation for Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database
    Patel, Nishant D.
    Weiss, Eric S.
    Allen, Jeremiah G.
    Russell, Stuart D.
    Shah, Ashish S.
    Vricella, Luca A.
    Conte, John V.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2009, 88 (03): : 814 - 822
  • [6] Weight Matching in Infant Heart Transplantation: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database
    Lee, J.
    Kidambi, S.
    Rosenthal, D.
    Nasirov, T.
    Dykes, J.
    Ma, M.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S220 - S220
  • [7] Simultaneous Heart and Kidney Transplantation in Children: Analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing Database
    Zafar, F.
    Adachi, I.
    Heinle, J. S.
    Cabrera, A. G.
    Dreyer, W. J.
    Rossano, J. W.
    Morales, D. L. S.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (04): : S112 - S112
  • [8] Heart Transplantation With and Without Prior Sternotomy: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database
    Kansara, P.
    Czer, L.
    Awad, M.
    Arabia, F.
    Mirocha, J.
    De Robertis, M.
    Moriguchi, J.
    Ramzy, D.
    Kass, R. M.
    Esmailian, F.
    Trento, A.
    Kobashigawa, J.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 46 (01) : 249 - 255
  • [9] Outcomes of Heart Re-Transplantation: Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)
    Briasoulis, A.
    Akintoye, E.
    Alvarez, P.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 39 (04): : S286 - S287
  • [10] ABO-incompatible heart transplantation in infants: Analysis of the united network for organ sharing database
    Patel, Nishant D.
    Weiss, Eric S.
    Nwakanma, Lois U.
    Scheel, Janet
    Cameron, Duke E.
    Vricella, Luca A.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 412 - 412